BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

426 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19429218)

  • 1. Rapid acquisition of preference in concurrent schedules: effects of d-amphetamine on sensitivity to reinforcement amount.
    Maguire DR; Rodewald AM; Hughes CE; Pitts RC
    Behav Processes; 2009 Jun; 81(2):238-43. PubMed ID: 19429218
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Choice in a variable environment: effects of d-amphetamine on sensitivity to reinforcement.
    Rodewald AM; Hughes CE; Pitts RC
    Behav Processes; 2010 May; 84(1):460-4. PubMed ID: 20188157
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Quantitative analyses of methamphetamine's effects on self-control choices: implications for elucidating behavioral mechanisms of drug action.
    Pitts RC; Febbo SM
    Behav Processes; 2004 Jun; 66(3):213-33. PubMed ID: 15157974
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Effects of d-amphetamine on behavior maintained by signaled and unsignaled delays to reinforcement.
    Thomas LD; Hughes CE; Pitts RC
    Behav Processes; 2009 Jun; 81(2):264-9. PubMed ID: 19429220
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Pentobarbital and d-amphetamine effects on concurrent performances.
    Bacotti AV
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1979 Jan; 31(1):141-58. PubMed ID: 429957
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Drug effects on responding maintained by stimulus-reinforcer and response-reinforcer contingencies.
    Spealman RD; Katz JL; Witkin JM
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1978 Sep; 30(2):187-96. PubMed ID: 702026
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Effects of amphetamine on differential reinforcement of low rates of responding.
    Saulsgiver KA; McClure EA; Wynne CD
    Behav Pharmacol; 2007 Mar; 18(2):119-33. PubMed ID: 17351419
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. An examination of d-amphetamine self-administration in pedunculopontine tegmental nucleus-lesioned rats.
    Alderson HL; Latimer MP; Blaha CD; Phillips AG; Winn P
    Neuroscience; 2004; 125(2):349-58. PubMed ID: 15062978
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Effects of unpredictable changes in initial-link duration on choice and timing.
    Kyonka EG; Grace RC
    Behav Processes; 2009 Jun; 81(2):227-32. PubMed ID: 19429216
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Gestational exposure to methylmercury retards choice in transition in aging rats.
    Newland MC; Reile PA; Langston JL
    Neurotoxicol Teratol; 2004; 26(2):179-94. PubMed ID: 15019952
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Effects of cocaine and d-amphetamine on the repeated acquisition and performance of conditional discriminations.
    Moerschbaecher JM; Boren JJ; Schrot J; Fontes JC
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1979 Jan; 31(1):127-40. PubMed ID: 429956
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Drug effects on multiple and alternating mixed-schedule performance.
    Leander JD
    J Pharmacol Exp Ther; 1981 Sep; 218(3):728-33. PubMed ID: 7264956
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Effects of d-amphetamine on responding of squirrel monkeys maintained under second-order schedules of food presentation, electric shock presentation or stimulus-shock termination.
    Barrett JE; Katz JL; Glowa JR
    J Pharmacol Exp Ther; 1981 Sep; 218(3):692-700. PubMed ID: 7264953
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Response allocation in a rapid-acquisition concurrent-chains procedure: effects of overall terminal-link duration.
    Christensen DR; Grace RC
    Behav Processes; 2009 Jun; 81(2):233-7. PubMed ID: 19429217
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Effects of drugs of abuse and signal predictability in two models of sustained attention in pigeons.
    Lemmonds CA; Wenger GR
    Behav Pharmacol; 2003 Jul; 14(4):279-94. PubMed ID: 12838034
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Effects of chlordiazepoxide and d-amphetamine on responding of squirrel monkeys maintained under concurrent or second-order schedules of response-produced food or electric shock presentation.
    Barrett JE; Valentine JO; Katz JL
    J Pharmacol Exp Ther; 1981 Oct; 219(1):199-206. PubMed ID: 7288608
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Effects of d-amphetamine on the behavior of pigeons exposed to the peak procedure.
    Saulsgiver KA; McClure EA; Wynne CD
    Behav Processes; 2006 Feb; 71(2-3):268-85. PubMed ID: 16413140
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Tolerance to d-amphetamine and lack of cross-tolerance to other drugs in rats under a multiple schedule of food presentation.
    Brocco MJ; McMillan DE
    J Pharmacol Exp Ther; 1983 Jan; 224(1):34-9. PubMed ID: 6848748
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Effects of variable training, signaled and unsignaled delays, and d-amphetamine on delay-discounting functions.
    Slezak JM; Anderson KG
    Behav Pharmacol; 2009 Sep; 20(5-6):424-36. PubMed ID: 19730365
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Rapid acquisition of preference in concurrent chains: effects of d-amphetamine on sensitivity to reinforcement delay.
    Ta WM; Pitts RC; Hughes CE; McLean AP; Grace RC
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2008 Jan; 89(1):71-91. PubMed ID: 18338676
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 22.