265 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19429220)
1. Effects of d-amphetamine on behavior maintained by signaled and unsignaled delays to reinforcement.
Thomas LD; Hughes CE; Pitts RC
Behav Processes; 2009 Jun; 81(2):264-9. PubMed ID: 19429220
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Effects of variable training, signaled and unsignaled delays, and d-amphetamine on delay-discounting functions.
Slezak JM; Anderson KG
Behav Pharmacol; 2009 Sep; 20(5-6):424-36. PubMed ID: 19730365
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Rapid acquisition of preference in concurrent schedules: effects of d-amphetamine on sensitivity to reinforcement amount.
Maguire DR; Rodewald AM; Hughes CE; Pitts RC
Behav Processes; 2009 Jun; 81(2):238-43. PubMed ID: 19429218
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Choice in a variable environment: effects of d-amphetamine on sensitivity to reinforcement.
Rodewald AM; Hughes CE; Pitts RC
Behav Processes; 2010 May; 84(1):460-4. PubMed ID: 20188157
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Briefly delayed reinforcement effects on variable-ratio and yoked-interval schedule performance.
Holtyn AF; Lattal KA
J Exp Anal Behav; 2013 Sep; 100(2):198-210. PubMed ID: 23900853
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Quantitative analyses of methamphetamine's effects on self-control choices: implications for elucidating behavioral mechanisms of drug action.
Pitts RC; Febbo SM
Behav Processes; 2004 Jun; 66(3):213-33. PubMed ID: 15157974
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Effects of amphetamine on differential reinforcement of low rates of responding.
Saulsgiver KA; McClure EA; Wynne CD
Behav Pharmacol; 2007 Mar; 18(2):119-33. PubMed ID: 17351419
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Signals, resistance to change, and conditioned reinforcement in a multiple schedule.
Bell MC; Gomez BE; Kessler K
Behav Processes; 2008 Jun; 78(2):158-64. PubMed ID: 18355988
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Effect of unsignaled delays between stimuli in a chain schedule on responding and resistance to change.
Bell MC; Gomez BE
Behav Processes; 2008 Mar; 77(3):343-50. PubMed ID: 17933472
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Separating the effects of response rate and reinforcement frequency in the rate-dependent effects of amphetamine and scopolamine on the schedule-controlled performance of rats and pigeons.
MacPhail RC; Gollub LR
J Pharmacol Exp Ther; 1975 Aug; 194(2):332-42. PubMed ID: 1151762
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Effects of unsignaled delays of reinforcement on fixed-interval schedule performance.
Elcoro M; Lattal KA
Behav Processes; 2011 Sep; 88(1):47-52. PubMed ID: 21801816
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. An examination of d-amphetamine self-administration in pedunculopontine tegmental nucleus-lesioned rats.
Alderson HL; Latimer MP; Blaha CD; Phillips AG; Winn P
Neuroscience; 2004; 125(2):349-58. PubMed ID: 15062978
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Effects of drugs of abuse and signal predictability in two models of sustained attention in pigeons.
Lemmonds CA; Wenger GR
Behav Pharmacol; 2003 Jul; 14(4):279-94. PubMed ID: 12838034
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Contingency tracking during unsignaled delayed reinforcement: Effects of delay duration and d-amphetamine.
Nighbor TD; Ozga-Hess JE; Anderson KG; Lattal KA
J Exp Anal Behav; 2019 May; 111(3):479-492. PubMed ID: 31038206
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Effect of signaling reinforcement on resistance to change in a multiple schedule.
Bell MC; Seip KM; Fitzsimmons KS
Behav Processes; 2007 Jan; 74(1):33-48. PubMed ID: 17071019
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Delayed reinforcement and fixed-ratio performance.
Jarmolowicz DP; Lattal KA
J Exp Anal Behav; 2013 Nov; 100(3):370-95. PubMed ID: 24037852
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Effects of d-amphetamine on the behavior of pigeons maintained by a second-order schedule of reinforcement.
Bond NW; Sanger DJ; Blackman DE
J Pharmacol Exp Ther; 1975 Aug; 194(2):327-31. PubMed ID: 1151761
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Disruption of performance under a titrating matching-to-sample schedule of reinforcement by drugs of abuse.
Wenger GR; Wright DW
J Pharmacol Exp Ther; 1990 Jul; 254(1):258-69. PubMed ID: 2366183
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Unsignaled delay of reinforcement, relative time, and resistance to change.
Shahan TA; Lattal KA
J Exp Anal Behav; 2005 May; 83(3):201-19. PubMed ID: 16047606
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Responding of pigeons under variable-interval schedules of unsignaled, briefly signaled, and completely signaled delays to reinforcement.
Schaal DW; Branch MN
J Exp Anal Behav; 1988 Jul; 50(1):33-54. PubMed ID: 16812548
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
