These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

123 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19429223)

  • 1. A comparison of responses and stimuli as time markers.
    Caetano MS; Church RM
    Behav Processes; 2009 Jun; 81(2):298-302. PubMed ID: 19429223
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Do rats time filled and empty intervals of equal duration differently?
    Macinnis ML
    Behav Processes; 2007 Jun; 75(2):182-7. PubMed ID: 17343993
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. DRL responding under uncertain reinforcement in rats after medial frontal cortical lesions.
    Nalwa V; Rao PS
    Behav Brain Res; 1985 Sep; 17(1):73-6. PubMed ID: 4041223
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Response suppression on DRL by rats with septal damage.
    Ellen P; Mokohon L; Richardson WK
    J Comp Physiol Psychol; 1978 Jun; 92(3):511-21. PubMed ID: 681566
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The hippocampus, collateral behavior, and timing.
    Rawlins JN; Winocur G; Gray JA
    Behav Neurosci; 1983 Dec; 97(6):857-72. PubMed ID: 6651961
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Serial conditional discrimination and temporal bisection in rats selectively lesioned in the dentate gyrus.
    Bueno JL; Bueno Júnior LS
    Behav Processes; 2011 Mar; 86(3):345-58. PubMed ID: 21335071
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Effects of combined or separate 5,7-dihydroxytryptamine lesions of the dorsal and median raphe nuclei on responding maintained by a DRL 20s schedule of food reinforcement.
    Fletcher PJ
    Brain Res; 1995 Mar; 675(1-2):45-54. PubMed ID: 7540930
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Averaging of temporal memories by rats.
    Swanton DN; Gooch CM; Matell MS
    J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process; 2009 Jul; 35(3):434-9. PubMed ID: 19594288
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Rats can learn a temporal task in a single session.
    Reyes MB; de Miranda DH; Tunes GC; Cravo AM; Caetano MS
    Behav Processes; 2020 Jan; 170():103986. PubMed ID: 31783298
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Fewer peak trials per session facilitate acquisition of peak responding despite elimination of response rate differences.
    Kaiser DH
    Behav Processes; 2009 Jan; 80(1):12-9. PubMed ID: 18793706
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Brief stimuli as context.
    Kalafut KL; Church RM
    Behav Processes; 2014 May; 104():65-71. PubMed ID: 24583101
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Do rats represent time logarithmically or linearly?
    Yi L
    Behav Processes; 2009 Jun; 81(2):274-9. PubMed ID: 19007867
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Shifts in the psychophysical function in rats.
    Guilhardi P; Macinnis ML; Church RM; Machado A
    Behav Processes; 2007 Jun; 75(2):167-75. PubMed ID: 17360131
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Dopamine receptor antagonists reverse amphetamine-induced behavioral alteration on a differential reinforcement for low-rate (DRL) operant task in the rat.
    Cheng RK; Liao RM
    Chin J Physiol; 2007 Apr; 50(2):77-88. PubMed ID: 17608145
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Timing and space usage are disrupted by amphetamine in rats maintained on DRL 24-s and DRL 72-s schedules of reinforcement.
    Fowler SC; Pinkston J; Vorontsova E
    Psychopharmacology (Berl); 2009 Jun; 204(2):213-25. PubMed ID: 19142629
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Control of the rat's sniffing behavior by response-independent and dependent schedules of reinforcing brain stimulation.
    Waranch HR; Terman M
    Physiol Behav; 1975 Sep; 15(3):365-72. PubMed ID: 1082145
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Effects of paleocerebellar lesions on DRL performance in the albino rat.
    Kirk WT; Berntson GG; Hothersall D
    J Comp Physiol Psychol; 1982 Jun; 96(3):348-60. PubMed ID: 7096677
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Magazine approach during a signal for food depends on Pavlovian, not instrumental, conditioning.
    Harris JA; Andrew BJ; Kwok DW
    J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process; 2013 Apr; 39(2):107-16. PubMed ID: 23421397
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Comparison of timing and classical conditioning.
    Holder MD; Roberts S
    J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process; 1985 Apr; 11(2):172-93. PubMed ID: 4009120
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Stimulus compounding in interval timing: the modality-duration relationship of the anchor durations results in qualitatively different response patterns to the compound cue.
    Swanton DN; Matell MS
    J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process; 2011 Jan; 37(1):94-107. PubMed ID: 20718546
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.