These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

173 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19429961)

  • 1. Infants' listening in multitalker environments: effect of the number of background talkers.
    Newman RS
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2009 May; 71(4):822-36. PubMed ID: 19429961
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The cocktail party effect in infants revisited: listening to one's name in noise.
    Newman RS
    Dev Psychol; 2005 Mar; 41(2):352-62. PubMed ID: 15769191
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Development and evaluation of the listening in spatialized noise test.
    Cameron S; Dillon H; Newall P
    Ear Hear; 2006 Feb; 27(1):30-42. PubMed ID: 16446563
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Infants' use of synchronized visual information to separate streams of speech.
    Hollich G; Newman RS; Jusczyk PW
    Child Dev; 2005; 76(3):598-613. PubMed ID: 15892781
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. On the perception of similarity among talkers.
    Remez RE; Fellowes JM; Nagel DS
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2007 Dec; 122(6):3688-96. PubMed ID: 18247776
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Multitalker speech perception with ideal time-frequency segregation: effects of voice characteristics and number of talkers.
    Brungart DS; Chang PS; Simpson BD; Wang D
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2009 Jun; 125(6):4006-22. PubMed ID: 19507982
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The cocktail party effect in infants.
    Newman RS; Jusczyk PW
    Percept Psychophys; 1996 Nov; 58(8):1145-56. PubMed ID: 8961826
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Speech production modifications produced by competing talkers, babble, and stationary noise.
    Lu Y; Cooke M
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2008 Nov; 124(5):3261-75. PubMed ID: 19045809
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Vocal effort with changing talker-to-listener distance in different acoustic environments.
    Pelegrín-García D; Smits B; Brunskog J; Jeong CH
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2011 Apr; 129(4):1981-90. PubMed ID: 21476654
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Categorical dependence of vowel detection in long-term speech-shaped noise.
    Liu C; Eddins DA
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2008 Jun; 123(6):4539-46. PubMed ID: 18537402
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Peripheral hearing loss reduces the ability of children to direct selective attention during multi-talker listening.
    Holmes E; Kitterick PT; Summerfield AQ
    Hear Res; 2017 Jul; 350():160-172. PubMed ID: 28505526
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Talker-to-listener distance effects on speech production and perception.
    Cheyne HA; Kalgaonkar K; Clements M; Zurek P
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2009 Oct; 126(4):2052-60. PubMed ID: 19813814
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The effect of talker- and listener-related factors on intelligibility for a real-word, open-set perception test.
    Markham D; Hazan V
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2004 Aug; 47(4):725-37. PubMed ID: 15324282
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Gaze patterns and audiovisual speech enhancement.
    Yi A; Wong W; Eizenman M
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2013 Apr; 56(2):471-80. PubMed ID: 23275394
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Message and talker identification in older adults: effects of task, distinctiveness of the talkers' voices, and meaningfulness of the competing message.
    Rossi-Katz J; Arehart KH
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2009 Apr; 52(2):435-53. PubMed ID: 19064902
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Effect of training on word-recognition performance in noise for young normal-hearing and older hearing-impaired listeners.
    Burk MH; Humes LE; Amos NE; Strauser LE
    Ear Hear; 2006 Jun; 27(3):263-78. PubMed ID: 16672795
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Talker Versus Dialect Effects on Speech Intelligibility: A Symmetrical Study.
    McCloy DR; Wright RA; Souza PE
    Lang Speech; 2015 Sep; 58(Pt 3):371-86. PubMed ID: 26529902
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Informational and energetic masking effects in the perception of multiple simultaneous talkers.
    Brungart DS; Simpson BD; Ericson MA; Scott KR
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2001 Nov; 110(5 Pt 1):2527-38. PubMed ID: 11757942
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The advantage of knowing the talker.
    Souza P; Gehani N; Wright R; McCloy D
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2013 Sep; 24(8):689-700. PubMed ID: 24131605
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Infant ability to tell voices apart rests on language experience.
    Johnson EK; Westrek E; Nazzi T; Cutler A
    Dev Sci; 2011 Sep; 14(5):1002-11. PubMed ID: 21884316
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.