105 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19429965)
1. Nonattentional effects of nonpredictive central cues.
Ivanoff J; Saoud W
Atten Percept Psychophys; 2009 May; 71(4):872-80. PubMed ID: 19429965
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Involuntary but not voluntary orienting contributes to a disengage deficit in visual neglect.
Olk B; Hildebrandt H; Kingstone A
Cortex; 2010 Oct; 46(9):1149-64. PubMed ID: 19733346
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The impact of multiple irrelevant visual events at the same spatial location on inhibition.
Visser TA; Barnes D
Atten Percept Psychophys; 2009 Feb; 71(2):392-402. PubMed ID: 19304628
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. On the uniqueness of attentional capture by uninformative gaze cues: facilitation interacts with the Simon effect and is rarely followed by IOR.
McKee D; Christie J; Klein R
Can J Exp Psychol; 2007 Dec; 61(4):293-303. PubMed ID: 18266505
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The functional role of alternation advantage in the sequence effect of symbolic cueing with nonpredictive arrow cues.
Qian Q; Song M; Shinomori K; Wang F
Atten Percept Psychophys; 2012 Oct; 74(7):1430-6. PubMed ID: 22718205
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Visuospatial attention shifts by gaze and arrow cues: an ERP study.
Hietanen JK; Leppänen JM; Nummenmaa L; Astikainen P
Brain Res; 2008 Jun; 1215():123-36. PubMed ID: 18485332
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. How do selected arrows guide visuospatial attention? Dissociating symbolic value and spatial proximity.
Leblanc E; Jolicoeur P
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2010 Oct; 36(5):1314-20. PubMed ID: 20873940
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Visuospatial attention is guided by both the symbolic value and the spatial proximity of selected arrows.
Pratt J; Radulescu P; Guo RM; Hommel B
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2010 Oct; 36(5):1321-4. PubMed ID: 20873941
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Implied body action directs spatial attention.
Gervais WM; Reed CL; Beall PM; Roberts RJ
Atten Percept Psychophys; 2010 Aug; 72(6):1437-43. PubMed ID: 20675790
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The influence of action on visual search: behavioral response toward stimuli modifies the selection process.
Buttaccio DR; Hahn S
Atten Percept Psychophys; 2011 Jul; 73(5):1453-66. PubMed ID: 21491163
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Inhibition of return in subliminal letter priming.
Marzouki Y; Grainger J; Theeuwes J
Acta Psychol (Amst); 2008 Sep; 129(1):112-20. PubMed ID: 18582840
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Attention to arrows: pointing to a new direction.
Ristic J; Kingstone A
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2006 Nov; 59(11):1921-30. PubMed ID: 16987781
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Hands up: attentional prioritization of space near the hand.
Reed CL; Grubb JD; Steele C
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2006 Feb; 32(1):166-77. PubMed ID: 16478334
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Time to act and attend to the real mechanisms of action and attention.
Dalrymple KA; Kingstone A
Br J Psychol; 2010 May; 101(Pt 2):213-6. PubMed ID: 19889256
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. How attentional systems process conflicting cues. The superiority of social over symbolic orienting revisited.
Nummenmaa L; Hietanen JK
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2009 Dec; 35(6):1738-54. PubMed ID: 19968432
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Normal and impaired reflexive orienting of attention after central nonpredictive cues.
Bonato M; Priftis K; Marenzi R; Zorzi M
J Cogn Neurosci; 2009 Apr; 21(4):745-59. PubMed ID: 18578597
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Symbolic control of attention: tracking its temporal dynamics.
Hommel B; Akyürek EG
Atten Percept Psychophys; 2009 Feb; 71(2):385-91. PubMed ID: 19304627
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Action-induced effects on perception depend neither on element-level nor on set-level similarity between stimulus and response sets.
Wykowska A; Hommel B; Schubö A
Atten Percept Psychophys; 2011 May; 73(4):1034-41. PubMed ID: 21472508
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Two components in IOR: evidence for response bias and perceptual processing delays using the SAT methodology.
Zhao Y; Heinke D; Ivanoff J; Klein RM; Humphreys GW
Atten Percept Psychophys; 2011 Oct; 73(7):2143-59. PubMed ID: 21789695
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Pictorial gaze cues do not enhance long-tailed macaques' performance on a computerised object-location task.
Vick SJ; Toxopeus I; Anderson JR
Behav Processes; 2006 Nov; 73(3):308-14. PubMed ID: 16962253
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
