These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

102 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19429965)

  • 1. Nonattentional effects of nonpredictive central cues.
    Ivanoff J; Saoud W
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2009 May; 71(4):872-80. PubMed ID: 19429965
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Involuntary but not voluntary orienting contributes to a disengage deficit in visual neglect.
    Olk B; Hildebrandt H; Kingstone A
    Cortex; 2010 Oct; 46(9):1149-64. PubMed ID: 19733346
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The impact of multiple irrelevant visual events at the same spatial location on inhibition.
    Visser TA; Barnes D
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2009 Feb; 71(2):392-402. PubMed ID: 19304628
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. On the uniqueness of attentional capture by uninformative gaze cues: facilitation interacts with the Simon effect and is rarely followed by IOR.
    McKee D; Christie J; Klein R
    Can J Exp Psychol; 2007 Dec; 61(4):293-303. PubMed ID: 18266505
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The functional role of alternation advantage in the sequence effect of symbolic cueing with nonpredictive arrow cues.
    Qian Q; Song M; Shinomori K; Wang F
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2012 Oct; 74(7):1430-6. PubMed ID: 22718205
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Visuospatial attention shifts by gaze and arrow cues: an ERP study.
    Hietanen JK; Leppänen JM; Nummenmaa L; Astikainen P
    Brain Res; 2008 Jun; 1215():123-36. PubMed ID: 18485332
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. How do selected arrows guide visuospatial attention? Dissociating symbolic value and spatial proximity.
    Leblanc E; Jolicoeur P
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2010 Oct; 36(5):1314-20. PubMed ID: 20873940
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Visuospatial attention is guided by both the symbolic value and the spatial proximity of selected arrows.
    Pratt J; Radulescu P; Guo RM; Hommel B
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2010 Oct; 36(5):1321-4. PubMed ID: 20873941
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Implied body action directs spatial attention.
    Gervais WM; Reed CL; Beall PM; Roberts RJ
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2010 Aug; 72(6):1437-43. PubMed ID: 20675790
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The influence of action on visual search: behavioral response toward stimuli modifies the selection process.
    Buttaccio DR; Hahn S
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2011 Jul; 73(5):1453-66. PubMed ID: 21491163
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Inhibition of return in subliminal letter priming.
    Marzouki Y; Grainger J; Theeuwes J
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2008 Sep; 129(1):112-20. PubMed ID: 18582840
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Attention to arrows: pointing to a new direction.
    Ristic J; Kingstone A
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2006 Nov; 59(11):1921-30. PubMed ID: 16987781
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Hands up: attentional prioritization of space near the hand.
    Reed CL; Grubb JD; Steele C
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2006 Feb; 32(1):166-77. PubMed ID: 16478334
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Time to act and attend to the real mechanisms of action and attention.
    Dalrymple KA; Kingstone A
    Br J Psychol; 2010 May; 101(Pt 2):213-6. PubMed ID: 19889256
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. How attentional systems process conflicting cues. The superiority of social over symbolic orienting revisited.
    Nummenmaa L; Hietanen JK
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2009 Dec; 35(6):1738-54. PubMed ID: 19968432
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Normal and impaired reflexive orienting of attention after central nonpredictive cues.
    Bonato M; Priftis K; Marenzi R; Zorzi M
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2009 Apr; 21(4):745-59. PubMed ID: 18578597
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Symbolic control of attention: tracking its temporal dynamics.
    Hommel B; Akyürek EG
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2009 Feb; 71(2):385-91. PubMed ID: 19304627
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Action-induced effects on perception depend neither on element-level nor on set-level similarity between stimulus and response sets.
    Wykowska A; Hommel B; Schubö A
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2011 May; 73(4):1034-41. PubMed ID: 21472508
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Two components in IOR: evidence for response bias and perceptual processing delays using the SAT methodology.
    Zhao Y; Heinke D; Ivanoff J; Klein RM; Humphreys GW
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2011 Oct; 73(7):2143-59. PubMed ID: 21789695
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Pictorial gaze cues do not enhance long-tailed macaques' performance on a computerised object-location task.
    Vick SJ; Toxopeus I; Anderson JR
    Behav Processes; 2006 Nov; 73(3):308-14. PubMed ID: 16962253
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.