336 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19430107)
1. Treatment planning for laser-accelerated very-high energy electrons.
Fuchs T; Szymanowski H; Oelfke U; Glinec Y; Rechatin C; Faure J; Malka V
Phys Med Biol; 2009 Jun; 54(11):3315-28. PubMed ID: 19430107
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Dosimetric advantages of IMPT over IMRT for laser-accelerated proton beams.
Luo W; Li J; Fourkal E; Fan J; Xu X; Chen Z; Jin L; Price R; Ma CM
Phys Med Biol; 2008 Dec; 53(24):7151-66. PubMed ID: 19033641
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Treatment planning for radiotherapy with very high-energy electron beams and comparison of VHEE and VMAT plans.
Bazalova-Carter M; Qu B; Palma B; Hårdemark B; Hynning E; Jensen C; Maxim PG; Loo BW
Med Phys; 2015 May; 42(5):2615-25. PubMed ID: 25979053
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Monte Carlo feasibility study of orthogonal bremsstrahlung beams for improved radiation therapy imaging.
Jabbari K; Sarfehnia A; Podgorsak EB; Seuntjens JP
Phys Med Biol; 2007 Feb; 52(4):1171-84. PubMed ID: 17264378
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Shielding design for a laser-accelerated proton therapy system.
Fan J; Luo W; Fourkal E; Lin T; Li J; Veltchev I; Ma CM
Phys Med Biol; 2007 Jul; 52(13):3913-30. PubMed ID: 17664585
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. A dose optimization method for electron radiotherapy using randomized aperture beams.
Engel K; Gauer T
Phys Med Biol; 2009 Sep; 54(17):5253-70. PubMed ID: 19671972
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Intensity modulated radiation therapy with electrons using algorithm based energy/range selection methods.
Olofsson L; Mu X; Nill S; Oelfke U; Zackrisson B; Karlsson M
Radiother Oncol; 2004 Nov; 73(2):223-31. PubMed ID: 15542170
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Comparison between PENELOPE and electron Monte Carlo simulations of electron fields used in the treatment of conjunctival lymphoma.
Brualla L; Palanco-Zamora R; Wittig A; Sempau J; Sauerwein W
Phys Med Biol; 2009 Sep; 54(18):5469-81. PubMed ID: 19706962
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A beam source model for scanned proton beams.
Kimstrand P; Traneus E; Ahnesjö A; Grusell E; Glimelius B; Tilly N
Phys Med Biol; 2007 Jun; 52(11):3151-68. PubMed ID: 17505095
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparative analysis of 60Co intensity-modulated radiation therapy.
Fox C; Romeijn HE; Lynch B; Men C; Aleman DM; Dempsey JF
Phys Med Biol; 2008 Jun; 53(12):3175-88. PubMed ID: 18506074
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Characteristics of very high-energy electron beams for the irradiation of deep-seated targets.
Böhlen TT; Germond JF; Traneus E; Bourhis J; Vozenin MC; Bailat C; Bochud F; Moeckli R
Med Phys; 2021 Jul; 48(7):3958-3967. PubMed ID: 33884618
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. An integrated Monte Carlo dosimetric verification system for radiotherapy treatment planning.
Yamamoto T; Mizowaki T; Miyabe Y; Takegawa H; Narita Y; Yano S; Nagata Y; Teshima T; Hiraoka M
Phys Med Biol; 2007 Apr; 52(7):1991-2008. PubMed ID: 17374923
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. [Experimental validation of a Monte Carlo-based treatment-planning system for electron beams].
Mika S; Christ G
Strahlenther Onkol; 2007 Mar; 183(3):150-6. PubMed ID: 17340074
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparison between the lateral penumbra of a collimated double-scattered beam and uncollimated scanning beam in proton radiotherapy.
Safai S; Bortfeld T; Engelsman M
Phys Med Biol; 2008 Mar; 53(6):1729-50. PubMed ID: 18367800
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Optimization of photon beam flatness for radiation therapy.
Olofsson J; Nyholm T; Ahnesjö A; Karlsson M
Phys Med Biol; 2007 Mar; 52(6):1735-46. PubMed ID: 17327659
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Monte Carlo dosimetric evaluation of high energy vs low energy photon beams in low density tissues.
Tsiakalos MF; Stathakis S; Plataniotis GA; Kappas C; Theodorou K
Radiother Oncol; 2006 Apr; 79(1):131-8. PubMed ID: 16618511
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Clinical implementation of enhanced dynamic wedges into the Pinnacle treatment planning system: Monte Carlo validation and patient-specific QA.
Ahmad M; Deng J; Lund MW; Chen Z; Kimmett J; Moran MS; Nath R
Phys Med Biol; 2009 Jan; 54(2):447-65. PubMed ID: 19098353
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Monochromatic beam characterization for Auger electron dosimetry and radiotherapy.
Dugas JP; Oves SD; Sajo E; Matthews KL; Ham K; Hogstrom KR
Eur J Radiol; 2008 Dec; 68(3 Suppl):S137-41. PubMed ID: 18599232
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Effect of transverse magnetic fields on dose distribution and RBE of photon beams: comparing PENELOPE and EGS4 Monte Carlo codes.
Nettelbeck H; Takacs GJ; Rosenfeld AB
Phys Med Biol; 2008 Sep; 53(18):5123-37. PubMed ID: 18723929
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Influence of the electron energy and number of beams on the absorbed dose distributions in radiotherapy of deep seated targets.
Garnica-Garza HM
Appl Radiat Isot; 2014 Dec; 94():101-108. PubMed ID: 25151497
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
