These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
130 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19431297)
1. A new quality assurance system for the evaluation of ecotoxicity studies submitted under the New Substances Notification Regulations in Canada. Breton RL; Gilron G; Thompson R; Rodney S; Teed S Integr Environ Assess Manag; 2009 Jan; 5(1):127-37. PubMed ID: 19431297 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Ecotoxicological characterisation and classification of existing chemicals. Examples from the ICCA HPV initiative and comparison with other existing chemicals. Licht O; Weyers A; Nagel R Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2004; 11(5):291-6. PubMed ID: 15506630 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Environmental properties and aquatic hazard assessment of anionic surfactants: physico-chemical, environmental fate and ecotoxicity properties. Könnecker G; Regelmann J; Belanger S; Gamon K; Sedlak R Ecotoxicol Environ Saf; 2011 Sep; 74(6):1445-60. PubMed ID: 21550112 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. What can be learnt from an ecotoxicity database in the framework of the REACh regulation? Henegar A; Mombelli E; Pandard P; Péry AR Sci Total Environ; 2011 Jan; 409(3):489-94. PubMed ID: 21093016 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Quantitative structure-activity relationships for predicting potential ecological hazard of organic chemicals for use in regulatory risk assessments. Comber MH; Walker JD; Watts C; Hermens J Environ Toxicol Chem; 2003 Aug; 22(8):1822-8. PubMed ID: 12924581 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Mode of action and the assessment of chemical hazards in the presence of limited data: use of structure-activity relationships (SAR) under TSCA, Section 5. Auer CM; Nabholz JV; Baetcke KP Environ Health Perspect; 1990 Jul; 87():183-97. PubMed ID: 2269224 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. A strategy to reduce the use of fish in acute ecotoxicity testing of new chemical substances notified in the European Union. Jeram S; Sintes JM; Halder M; Fentanes JB; Sokull-Klüttgen B; Hutchinson TH Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2005 Jul; 42(2):218-24. PubMed ID: 15949882 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Improving substance information in USEtox Saouter E; Aschberger K; Fantke P; Hauschild MZ; Kienzler A; Paini A; Pant R; Radovnikovic A; Secchi M; Sala S Environ Toxicol Chem; 2017 Dec; 36(12):3463-3470. PubMed ID: 28671290 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Chemicals of emerging concern in the Great Lakes Basin: an analysis of environmental exposures. Klecka G; Persoon C; Currie R Rev Environ Contam Toxicol; 2010; 207():1-93. PubMed ID: 20652664 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. History of EPI Suite™ and future perspectives on chemical property estimation in US Toxic Substances Control Act new chemical risk assessments. Card ML; Gomez-Alvarez V; Lee WH; Lynch DG; Orentas NS; Lee MT; Wong EM; Boethling RS Environ Sci Process Impacts; 2017 Mar; 19(3):203-212. PubMed ID: 28275775 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Analysis of currently available data for characterising the risk of engineered nanomaterials to the environment and human health--lessons learned from four case studies. Aschberger K; Micheletti C; Sokull-Klüttgen B; Christensen FM Environ Int; 2011 Aug; 37(6):1143-56. PubMed ID: 21397332 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Integrated testing and intelligent assessment-new challenges under REACH. Ahlers J; Stock F; Werschkun B Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2008 Oct; 15(7):565-72. PubMed ID: 18818964 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Background of REACH in EU regulations on evaluation of chemicals. Foth H; Hayes A Hum Exp Toxicol; 2008 Jun; 27(6):443-61. PubMed ID: 18784197 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Risk management frameworks for human health and environmental risks. Jardine C; Hrudey S; Shortreed J; Craig L; Krewski D; Furgal C; McColl S J Toxicol Environ Health B Crit Rev; 2003; 6(6):569-720. PubMed ID: 14698953 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. QSAR modeling of cumulative environmental end-points for the prioritization of hazardous chemicals. Gramatica P; Papa E; Sangion A Environ Sci Process Impacts; 2018 Jan; 20(1):38-47. PubMed ID: 29226926 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. U.S. EPA regulatory perspectives on the use of QSAR for new and existing chemical evaluations. Zeeman M; Auer CM; Clements RG; Nabholz JV; Boethling RS SAR QSAR Environ Res; 1995; 3(3):179-201. PubMed ID: 8564854 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Application of chemical reaction mechanistic domains to an ecotoxicity QSAR model, the KAshinhou Tool for Ecotoxicity (KATE). Furuhama A; Hasunuma K; Aoki Y; Yoshioka Y; Shiraishi H SAR QSAR Environ Res; 2011; 22(5-6):505-23. PubMed ID: 21604231 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Four selected high molecular weight heterocyclic aromatic hydrocarbons: Ecotoxicological hazard assessment, environmental relevance and regulatory needs under REACH. Brendel S; Polleichtner C; Behnke A; Jessel S; Hassold E; Jennemann C; Einhenkel-Arle D; Seidel A Ecotoxicol Environ Saf; 2018 Nov; 163():340-348. PubMed ID: 30059878 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Ecotoxic effect of photocatalytic active nanoparticles (TiO2) on algae and daphnids. Hund-Rinke K; Simon M Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2006 Jul; 13(4):225-32. PubMed ID: 16910119 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. An overview of the use of quantitative structure-activity relationships for ranking and prioritizing large chemical inventories for environmental risk assessments. Russom CL; Breton RL; Walker JD; Bradbury SP Environ Toxicol Chem; 2003 Aug; 22(8):1810-21. PubMed ID: 12924580 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]