These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
4. Detecting deception: the promise and the reality of voice stress analysis. Horvath F J Forensic Sci; 1982 Apr; 27(2):340-51. PubMed ID: 7047675 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The accuracy of auditors' and layered voice Analysis (LVA) operators' judgments of truth and deception during police questioning. Horvath F; McCloughan J; Weatherman D; Slowik S J Forensic Sci; 2013 Mar; 58(2):385-92. PubMed ID: 23406506 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Voice disguise and automatic speaker recognition. Zhang C; Tan T Forensic Sci Int; 2008 Mar; 175(2-3):118-22. PubMed ID: 17646071 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Speaking of secrets and lies: the contribution of ventrolateral prefrontal cortex to vocal deception. Spence SA; Kaylor-Hughes C; Farrow TF; Wilkinson ID Neuroimage; 2008 Apr; 40(3):1411-8. PubMed ID: 18308586 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Assigned versus random, countermeasure-like responses in the p300 based complex trial protocol for detection of deception: task demand effects. Meixner JB; Haynes A; Winograd MR; Brown J; Peter Rosenfeld J Appl Psychophysiol Biofeedback; 2009 Sep; 34(3):209-20. PubMed ID: 19543970 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Behavioral cues to deception vs. topic incriminating potential in criminal confessions. Davis M; Markus KA; Walters SB; Vorus N; Connors B Law Hum Behav; 2005 Dec; 29(6):683-704. PubMed ID: 16382356 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Evaluation of psychological stress as an investigative tool. Chapman JL Leg Med; 1980; ():57-74. PubMed ID: 7421395 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Pitch changes during attempted deception. Streeter LA; Krauss RM; Geller V; Olson C; Apple W J Pers Soc Psychol; 1977 May; 35(5):345-50. PubMed ID: 874738 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Efficacy of forensic statement analysis in distinguishing truthful from deceptive eyewitness accounts of highly stressful events. Morgan CA; Colwell K; Hazlett GA J Forensic Sci; 2011 Sep; 56(5):1227-34. PubMed ID: 21854383 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. A description and analysis of the operation and validity of the psychological stress evaluator. VanDercar DH; Greaner J; Hibler NS; Spielberger CD; Bloch S J Forensic Sci; 1980 Jan; 25(1):174-88. PubMed ID: 7391775 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. An experimental comparison of the psychological stress evaluator and the galvanic skin response in detection of deception. Horvath F J Appl Psychol; 1978 Jun; 63(3):338-44. PubMed ID: 690061 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Psychophysiological and vocal measures in the detection of guilty knowledge. Gamer M; Rill HG; Vossel G; Gödert HW Int J Psychophysiol; 2006 Apr; 60(1):76-87. PubMed ID: 16005091 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The reliability of lie detection performance. Leach AM; Lindsay RC; Koehler R; Beaudry JL; Bala NC; Lee K; Talwar V Law Hum Behav; 2009 Feb; 33(1):96-109. PubMed ID: 18594955 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]