These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

328 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19432831)

  • 1. The acoustic hood: a patient-independent device improving acoustic noise protection during neonatal magnetic resonance imaging.
    Nordell A; Lundh M; Horsch S; Hallberg B; Aden U; Nordell B; Blennow M
    Acta Paediatr; 2009 Aug; 98(8):1278-83. PubMed ID: 19432831
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. [Measurement of noise protection in functional magnetic resonance imaging].
    Liener K; Wunderlich A; Ehret G; Bachor E
    Laryngorhinootologie; 2005 Feb; 84(2):108-12. PubMed ID: 15712046
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Efficacy of passive acoustic screening: implications for the design of imager and MR-suite.
    Moelker A; Vogel MW; Pattynama PM
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 2003 Feb; 17(2):270-5. PubMed ID: 12541235
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Development of sound measurement systems for auditory functional magnetic resonance imaging.
    Nam EC; Kim SS; Lee KU; Kim SS
    Magn Reson Imaging; 2008 Jun; 26(5):715-20. PubMed ID: 18440748
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Acoustic noise characteristics of a 4 Telsa MRI scanner.
    More SR; Lim TC; Li M; Holland CK; Boyce SE; Lee JH
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 2006 Mar; 23(3):388-97. PubMed ID: 16463341
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Measurement and evaluation of the acoustic noise of a 3 Tesla MR scanner.
    Hattori Y; Fukatsu H; Ishigaki T
    Nagoya J Med Sci; 2007 Jan; 69(1-2):23-8. PubMed ID: 17378177
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Acoustic noise analysis in echo planar imaging: multicenter trial and comparison with other pulse sequences.
    Miyati T; Banno T; Fujita H; Mase M; Narita H; Imazawa M; Ohba S
    IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 1999 Aug; 18(8):733-6. PubMed ID: 10534055
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Verbal communication in MR environments: effect of MR system acoustic noise on speech understanding.
    Moelker A; Maas RA; Pattynama PM
    Radiology; 2004 Jul; 232(1):107-13. PubMed ID: 15220495
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Importance of bone-conducted sound transmission on patient hearing in the MR scanner.
    Moelker A; Maas RA; Vogel MW; Ouhlous M; Pattynama PM
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 2005 Jul; 22(1):163-9. PubMed ID: 15971178
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Acoustic FMRI noise: linear time-invariant system model.
    Rizzo Sierra CV; Versluis MJ; Hoogduin JM; Duifhuis HD
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2008 Sep; 55(9):2115-23. PubMed ID: 18713680
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Neonatal incubators: a toxic sound environment for the preterm infant?*.
    Marik PE; Fuller C; Levitov A; Moll E
    Pediatr Crit Care Med; 2012 Nov; 13(6):685-9. PubMed ID: 22791088
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Acoustic noise transfer function in clinical MRI a multicenter analysis.
    Hamaguchi T; Miyati T; Ohno N; Hirano M; Hayashi N; Gabata T; Matsui O; Matsushita T; Yamamoto T; Fujiwara Y; Kimura H; Takeda H; Takehara Y
    Acad Radiol; 2011 Jan; 18(1):101-6. PubMed ID: 21145030
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Characterization of acoustic noise in a neonatal intensive care unit MRI system.
    Tkach JA; Li Y; Pratt RG; Baroch KA; Loew W; Daniels BR; Giaquinto RO; Merhar SL; Kline-Fath BM; Dumoulin CL
    Pediatr Radiol; 2014 Aug; 44(8):1011-9. PubMed ID: 24595878
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Attenuation of high-level impulses by earmuffs.
    Zera J; Mlynski R
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2007 Oct; 122(4):2082-96. PubMed ID: 17902846
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Infants born very preterm react to variations of the acoustic environment in their incubator from a minimum signal-to-noise ratio threshold of 5 to 10 dBA.
    Kuhn P; Zores C; Pebayle T; Hoeft A; Langlet C; Escande B; Astruc D; Dufour A
    Pediatr Res; 2012 Apr; 71(4 Pt 1):386-92. PubMed ID: 22391640
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Acoustic noise in functional magnetic resonance imaging reduces pain unpleasantness ratings.
    Boyle Y; Bentley DE; Watson A; Jones AK
    Neuroimage; 2006 Jul; 31(3):1278-83. PubMed ID: 16517183
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Background MR gradient noise and non-auditory BOLD activations: a data-driven perspective.
    Haller S; Homola GA; Scheffler K; Beckmann CF; Bartsch AJ
    Brain Res; 2009 Jul; 1282():74-83. PubMed ID: 19505438
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [Study on effects of combined hearing protector on communication quality and noise protection].
    Li D; Zheng S; He Y
    Space Med Med Eng (Beijing); 1997 Oct; 10(5):373-5. PubMed ID: 11540394
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The use of active noise control (ANC) to reduce acoustic noise generated during MRI scanning: some initial results.
    McJury M; Stewart RW; Crawford D; Toma E
    Magn Reson Imaging; 1997; 15(3):319-22. PubMed ID: 9201679
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Assessment of comfort of various hearing protection devices (HPD).
    Bhattacharya SK; Tripathi SR; Kashyap SK
    J Hum Ergol (Tokyo); 1993 Dec; 22(2):163-72. PubMed ID: 7963482
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 17.