294 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19434605)
1. Radial versus femoral approach for high-speed rotational atherectomy.
Watt J; Oldroyd KG
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2009 Oct; 74(4):550-4. PubMed ID: 19434605
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Rotational atherectomy through the radial artery is associated with similar procedural success when compared with the transfemoral route.
Kotowycz MA; Khan SQ; Freixa X; Ivanov J; Seidelin PH; Overgaard CB; Džavík V
Coron Artery Dis; 2015 May; 26(3):254-8. PubMed ID: 25493660
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. High-speed rotational atherectomy using the radial artery approach and a sheathless guide: a single-centre comparison with the "conventional" femoral approach.
Kassimis G; Patel N; Kharbanda RK; Channon KM; Banning AP
EuroIntervention; 2014 Oct; 10(6):694-9. PubMed ID: 24425306
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Radial Versus Femoral Access for Rotational Atherectomy: A UK Observational Study of 8622 Patients.
Watt J; Austin D; Mackay D; Nolan J; Oldroyd KG
Circ Cardiovasc Interv; 2017 Dec; 10(12):. PubMed ID: 29246910
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Safety and efficacy of radial versus femoral access for rotational Atherectomy: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Khan AA; Panchal HB; Zaidi SIM; Papireddy MR; Mukherjee D; Cohen MG; Banerjee S; Rao SV; Pancholy S; Paul TK
Cardiovasc Revasc Med; 2019 Mar; 20(3):241-247. PubMed ID: 30030065
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. A randomized comparison of the transradial and transfemoral approaches for coronary artery bypass graft angiography and intervention: the RADIAL-CABG Trial (RADIAL Versus Femoral Access for Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Angiography and Intervention).
Michael TT; Alomar M; Papayannis A; Mogabgab O; Patel VG; Rangan BV; Luna M; Hastings JL; Grodin J; Abdullah S; Banerjee S; Brilakis ES
JACC Cardiovasc Interv; 2013 Nov; 6(11):1138-44. PubMed ID: 24139930
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. In patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention with rotational atherectomy radial access is safer and as efficient as femoral access.
Kübler P; Zimoch W; Kosowski M; Tomasiewicz B; Telichowski A; Reczuch K
J Interv Cardiol; 2018 Aug; 31(4):471-477. PubMed ID: 29468734
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A randomized comparison of transradial versus transfemoral approach for coronary angiography and angioplasty.
Brueck M; Bandorski D; Kramer W; Wieczorek M; Höltgen R; Tillmanns H
JACC Cardiovasc Interv; 2009 Nov; 2(11):1047-54. PubMed ID: 19926042
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. High-speed rotational atherectomy during transradial percutaneous coronary intervention.
Egred M; Andron M; Alahmar A; Albouaini K; Perry RA
J Invasive Cardiol; 2008 May; 20(5):219-21. PubMed ID: 18460704
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Radial Versus Femoral Access for Coronary Interventions Across the Entire Spectrum of Patients With Coronary Artery Disease: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Trials.
Ferrante G; Rao SV; Jüni P; Da Costa BR; Reimers B; Condorelli G; Anzuini A; Jolly SS; Bertrand OF; Krucoff MW; Windecker S; Valgimigli M
JACC Cardiovasc Interv; 2016 Jul; 9(14):1419-34. PubMed ID: 27372195
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Radial versus femoral access for primary percutaneous interventions in ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction patients: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.
Karrowni W; Vyas A; Giacomino B; Schweizer M; Blevins A; Girotra S; Horwitz PA
JACC Cardiovasc Interv; 2013 Aug; 6(8):814-23. PubMed ID: 23968700
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Operator learning curve for transradial percutaneous coronary interventions: implications for the initiation of a transradial access program in contemporary US practice.
Barbash IM; Minha S; Gallino R; Lager R; Badr S; Loh JP; Kitabata H; Pendyala LK; Torguson R; Satler LF; Pichard AD; Waksman R
Cardiovasc Revasc Med; 2014 Jun; 15(4):195-9. PubMed ID: 24746598
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Radial vs. femoral approach for primary percutaneous coronary intervention in octogenarians.
Koutouzis M; Matejka G; Olivecrona G; Grip L; Albertsson P
Cardiovasc Revasc Med; 2010; 11(2):79-83. PubMed ID: 20347796
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Radial versus femoral access for orally anticoagulated patients.
Ziakas AG; Koskinas KC; Gavrilidis S; Giannoglou GD; Hadjimiltiades S; Gourassas I; Theofilogiannakos E; Economou F; Styliadis I
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2010 Oct; 76(4):493-9. PubMed ID: 20882651
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. [Multicentric experience with the use of Sheathless 6.5 French-size catheter in coronary angioplasty for bifurcation lesions: feasibility and safety].
Cheaito R; Benamer H; Tritar A; Mustafic H; Derraz Y; Tavolaro O; Hovasse T; Gaultier C; Garot P; Lefevre T; Louvard Y; Morice MC
Ann Cardiol Angeiol (Paris); 2012 Dec; 61(6):405-12. PubMed ID: 23092523
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Rotational atherectomy for left main coronary artery disease in octogenarians: transradial approach in a tertiary center and literature review.
Dahdouh Z; Roule V; Dugué AE; Sabatier R; Lognoné T; Grollier G
J Interv Cardiol; 2013 Apr; 26(2):173-82. PubMed ID: 23557587
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Small-Size vs Large-Size Burr for Rotational Atherectomy.
Levi Y; Lavi S; Solomonica A; Israeli Z; Bagur R
J Invasive Cardiol; 2019 Jun; 31(6):183-186. PubMed ID: 31158807
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Transradial versus transfemoral method of percutaneous coronary revascularization for unprotected left main coronary artery disease: comparison of procedural and late-term outcomes.
Yang YJ; Kandzari DE; Gao Z; Xu B; Chen JL; Qiao SB; Li JJ; Qin XW; Yao M; Wu YJ; Yuan JQ; Chen J; Liu HB; Dai J; Chen T; Wang Y; Li W; Gao RL
JACC Cardiovasc Interv; 2010 Oct; 3(10):1035-42. PubMed ID: 20965462
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Temporal changes in radial access use, associates and outcomes in patients undergoing PCI using rotational atherectomy between 2007 and 2014: results from the British Cardiovascular Intervention Society national database.
Kinnaird T; Cockburn J; Gallagher S; Choudhury A; Sirker A; Ludman P; de Belder M; Copt S; Mamas M; de Belder A
Am Heart J; 2018 Apr; 198():46-54. PubMed ID: 29653648
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Transradial versus transfemoral percutaneous coronary intervention in acute coronary syndromes: re-evaluation of the current body of evidence.
Lee MS; Wolfe M; Stone GW
JACC Cardiovasc Interv; 2013 Nov; 6(11):1149-52. PubMed ID: 24262614
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
