These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

89 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19434820)

  • 1. Effect of data standardization on chemical clustering and similarity searching.
    Chu CW; Holliday JD; Willett P
    J Chem Inf Model; 2009 Feb; 49(2):155-61. PubMed ID: 19434820
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Clustering files of chemical structures using the Székely-Rizzo generalization of Ward's method.
    Varin T; Bureau R; Mueller C; Willett P
    J Mol Graph Model; 2009 Sep; 28(2):187-95. PubMed ID: 19640752
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Clustering and rule-based classifications of chemical structures evaluated in the biological activity space.
    Schuffenhauer A; Brown N; Ertl P; Jenkins JL; Selzer P; Hamon J
    J Chem Inf Model; 2007; 47(2):325-36. PubMed ID: 17286395
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Combining multiple classifications of chemical structures using consensus clustering.
    Chu CW; Holliday JD; Willett P
    Bioorg Med Chem; 2012 Sep; 20(18):5366-71. PubMed ID: 22484008
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Random or rational design? Evaluation of diverse compound subsets from chemical structure databases.
    Pötter T; Matter H
    J Med Chem; 1998 Feb; 41(4):478-88. PubMed ID: 9484498
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Evaluation of similarity measures for searching the dictionary of natural products database.
    Whittle M; Willett P; Klaffke W; van Noort P
    J Chem Inf Comput Sci; 2003; 43(2):449-57. PubMed ID: 12653508
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. New methods for ligand-based virtual screening: use of data fusion and machine learning to enhance the effectiveness of similarity searching.
    Hert J; Willett P; Wilton DJ; Acklin P; Azzaoui K; Jacoby E; Schuffenhauer A
    J Chem Inf Model; 2006; 46(2):462-70. PubMed ID: 16562973
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comparison of nonbinary similarity coefficients for similarity searching, clustering and compound selection.
    Al Khalifa A; Haranczyk M; Holliday J
    J Chem Inf Model; 2009 May; 49(5):1193-201. PubMed ID: 19405526
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Development of a spectral clustering method for the analysis of molecular data sets.
    Brewer ML
    J Chem Inf Model; 2007; 47(5):1727-33. PubMed ID: 17636944
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Enhancing the effectiveness of virtual screening by fusing nearest neighbor lists: a comparison of similarity coefficients.
    Whittle M; Gillet VJ; Willett P; Alex A; Loesel J
    J Chem Inf Comput Sci; 2004; 44(5):1840-8. PubMed ID: 15446844
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Molecular Property eXplorer: a novel approach to visualizing SAR using tree-maps and heatmaps.
    Kibbey C; Calvet A
    J Chem Inf Model; 2005; 45(2):523-32. PubMed ID: 15807518
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Clustering files of chemical structures using the fuzzy k-means clustering method.
    Holliday JD; Rodgers SL; Willett P; Chen MY; Mahfouf M; Lawson K; Mullier G
    J Chem Inf Comput Sci; 2004; 44(3):894-902. PubMed ID: 15154754
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Comparison of molecular fingerprint methods on the basis of biological profile data.
    Steffen A; Kogej T; Tyrchan C; Engkvist O
    J Chem Inf Model; 2009 Feb; 49(2):338-47. PubMed ID: 19434835
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Enhancing the effectiveness of similarity-based virtual screening using nearest-neighbor information.
    Hert J; Willett P; Wilton DJ; Acklin P; Azzaoui K; Jacoby E; Schuffenhauer A
    J Med Chem; 2005 Nov; 48(22):7049-54. PubMed ID: 16250664
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Similarity searching of chemical databases using atom environment descriptors (MOLPRINT 2D): evaluation of performance.
    Bender A; Mussa HY; Glen RC; Reiling S
    J Chem Inf Comput Sci; 2004; 44(5):1708-18. PubMed ID: 15446830
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Comparison of fingerprint-based methods for virtual screening using multiple bioactive reference structures.
    Hert J; Willett P; Wilton DJ; Acklin P; Azzaoui K; Jacoby E; Schuffenhauer A
    J Chem Inf Comput Sci; 2004; 44(3):1177-85. PubMed ID: 15154787
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Comparison of similarity coefficients for clustering and compound selection.
    Haranczyk M; Holliday J
    J Chem Inf Model; 2008 Mar; 48(3):498-508. PubMed ID: 18293953
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Aerosol time-of-flight mass spectrometry data analysis: a benchmark of clustering algorithms.
    Rebotier TP; Prather KA
    Anal Chim Acta; 2007 Feb; 585(1):38-54. PubMed ID: 17386645
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Accelerated K-means clustering in metric spaces.
    Smellie A
    J Chem Inf Comput Sci; 2004; 44(6):1929-35. PubMed ID: 15554661
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Dense mode clustering in brain maps.
    Hanson SJ; Rebecchi R; Hanson C; Halchenko YO
    Magn Reson Imaging; 2007 Nov; 25(9):1249-62. PubMed ID: 17459639
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.