These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
170 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1943514)
1. Tightening the reins: recent trend in the application of the insanity defence in Canada. Verdun-Jones SN Med Law; 1991; 10(3):285-304. PubMed ID: 1943514 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The Law Commission's proposals for the reform of the defences of insanity and automatism. Ormerod D Med Sci Law; 2015 Jul; 55(3):156-61. PubMed ID: 26378106 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. An anatomy of automatism. Mackay RD Med Sci Law; 2015 Jul; 55(3):150-5. PubMed ID: 26378105 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Reforming automatism and insanity: Neuroscience and claims of lack of capacity for control. Claydon L Med Sci Law; 2015 Jul; 55(3):162-7. PubMed ID: 26378107 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Disposition of insanity acquittees in Illinois. Wettstein RM; Mulvey EP Bull Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 1988; 16(1):11-24. PubMed ID: 3365475 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Guilty but insane: the insanity defence in Ireland, 1850-1995. Gibbons P; Mulryan N; O'Connor A Br J Psychiatry; 1997 May; 170():467-72. PubMed ID: 9307699 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The insanity defence. Milliken AD Can J Psychiatry; 1985 Aug; 30(5):323-8. PubMed ID: 4027856 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Canadian landmark case: Regina v. Swain: translating M'Naughton into twentieth century Canadian. Glancy GD; Bradford JM J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 1999; 27(2):301-7. PubMed ID: 10400437 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Adjudicating mentally disordered offenders in Ghana: The criminal and mental health legislations. Adjorlolo S; Chan HC; Mensah Agboli J Int J Law Psychiatry; 2016; 45():1-8. PubMed ID: 26923137 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Monitored conditional release of persons found not guilty by reason of insanity. Bloom JD; Williams MH; Bigelow DA Am J Psychiatry; 1991 Apr; 148(4):444-8. PubMed ID: 2006688 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Putting negative attitudes on the agenda? Not Criminally Responsible Reform Act publicity and juror decision-making. Maeder EM; Yamamoto S; Zannella L Int J Law Psychiatry; 2016; 49(Pt A):154-159. PubMed ID: 27720501 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The negligible effects of California's 1982 reform of the insanity defense test. McGreevy MA; Steadman HJ; Callahan LA Am J Psychiatry; 1991 Jun; 148(6):744-50. PubMed ID: 2035715 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The insanity defence: from wild beasts to M'Naghten. Allnutt S; Samuels A; O'driscoll C Australas Psychiatry; 2007 Aug; 15(4):292-8. PubMed ID: 17612881 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The defense of mental disorder and crimes against the person committed under the influence of cannabis: A Canadian perspective. Bernard-Arevalo SP; Dellazizzo L; Marceau É; Dumais A Behav Sci Law; 2022 Mar; 40(2):239-260. PubMed ID: 35767629 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The New York State Insanity Defense Reform Act of 1980: a legislative experiment. McClellan DS Bull Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 1989; 17(2):129-51. PubMed ID: 2758117 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The evolution and definition of the concept of 'automatism' in Canadian case law. Jang D; Coles EM Med Law; 1995; 14(3-4):221-38. PubMed ID: 8524004 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The unconditional release of mentally ill offenders from indefinite commitment: a study of Missouri insanity acquittees. Linhorst DM J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 1999; 27(4):563-79. PubMed ID: 10638784 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The impact of system design on the characteristics of Missouri's insanity acquittees. Linhorst DM J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 1997; 25(4):509-29. PubMed ID: 9460038 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]