These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

147 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19435191)

  • 1. [An automatic device for testing medical electrodes].
    Avdeeva DK; Vylegzhanin ON; Grekhov IS; Kazakov VIu; Kim VL; Klubovich IA; Rybalka SA; Sadovnikov IuG; Iakimov EV
    Med Tekh; 2009; (2):51-5. PubMed ID: 19435191
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Simulated testing in medical device design.
    Kenny S; McDermott E
    Med Device Technol; 2006 May; 17(4):22-5. PubMed ID: 16886818
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Precious metals: materials of diversity.
    Baltzer N
    Med Device Technol; 2007 Oct; 18(6):36-7. PubMed ID: 18078181
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Packaging matters--part II: material selection.
    Lewis R
    Med Device Technol; 1991 Mar; 2(2):10-3. PubMed ID: 10149433
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Selecting adhesives.
    Fakley ME
    Med Device Technol; 2003 Sep; 14(7):22-4. PubMed ID: 14528810
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Thin film metrology.
    Nitsch G; Flinn G
    Med Device Technol; 2007 Oct; 18(6):50-1. PubMed ID: 18078184
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Experimental test systems for the assessment of the blood compatibility of materials used in extracorporeal circuits.
    Schmidt B
    Nephrol Dial Transplant; 1994; 9 Suppl 2():77-82. PubMed ID: 8065620
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A simple device for making tungsten micro-electrodes in bulk.
    Horn G
    J Physiol; 1969 Sep; 204(1):6P-7P. PubMed ID: 5352072
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Medical device development: design, engineering, testing, and legal issues protection-steps in the process to success.
    Buchman AL; Spapperi J; Francuzenko KW; Blakeslee MR; Toffenetti J; Leopold P;
    Am J Gastroenterol; 2009 Mar; 104(3):543-5. PubMed ID: 19262512
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Nurturing your intellectual property.
    Edelman M
    Med Device Technol; 2001 Mar; 12(2):24-5. PubMed ID: 11317836
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [CE marking for medical devices].
    Villars F; Pariente JL; Conort P
    Prog Urol; 2005 Nov; 15(5):985-91. PubMed ID: 16475662
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. In vitro biocompatibility testing of biomaterials and medical devices.
    Müller U
    Med Device Technol; 2008; 19(2):30, 32-4. PubMed ID: 18605289
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [Device for microscopic examination of glass microelectrodes in an electrolyte solution].
    Marinichev AA
    Zh Vyssh Nerv Deiat Im I P Pavlova; 1969; 19(2):379-81. PubMed ID: 5404368
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Artificial vision: needs, functioning, and testing of a retinal electronic prosthesis.
    Chader GJ; Weiland J; Humayun MS
    Prog Brain Res; 2009; 175():317-32. PubMed ID: 19660665
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [Semi-automatic device for making glass microelectrodes].
    Sterc J; Tengler J; Strnad M
    Cesk Fysiol; 1968; 17(6):607-10. PubMed ID: 5713035
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Changes in equipment acceptance testing.
    Frey GD
    J Am Coll Radiol; 2005 Jul; 2(7):639-41. PubMed ID: 17411893
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Alloy powders for medical applications.
    Murray K; Kearns M; Mottu N
    Med Device Technol; 2009 Sep; 20(5):48, 50-1. PubMed ID: 19852184
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A unique test device.
    Herrmann FM
    Hosp Mater Manage Q; 1988 May; 9(4):55-61. PubMed ID: 10287091
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A practical approach to designing operating instructions for medical products in late or post-design phases.
    Gupta SP; Lyons M
    J Med Eng Technol; 2009; 33(3):238-44. PubMed ID: 19340695
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Decision process to assess medical equipment for hyperbaric use.
    Burman F; Sheffield R; Posey K
    Undersea Hyperb Med; 2009; 36(2):137-44. PubMed ID: 19462753
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.