BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

367 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19437191)

  • 1. Estimation of the true number of lymph nodes in lymphadenectomy specimens from radical cystectomy.
    Jensen JB; Ulhøi BP; Jensen KM
    Scand J Urol Nephrol; 2009; 43(4):288-92. PubMed ID: 19437191
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Separate submission of standard lymphadenectomy in 6 packets versus en bloc lymphadenectomy in bladder cancer.
    Ather MH; Alam Z; Jamshaid A; Siddiqui KM; Sulaiman MN
    Urol J; 2008; 5(2):94-8. PubMed ID: 18592461
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Radical cystectomy and extended pelvic lymphadenectomy: survival of patients with lymph node metastasis above the bifurcation of the common iliac vessels treated with surgery only.
    Steven K; Poulsen AL
    J Urol; 2007 Oct; 178(4 Pt 1):1218-23; discussion 1223-4. PubMed ID: 17698113
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Radical cystectomy with extended lymphadenectomy: evaluating separate package versus en bloc submission for node positive bladder cancer.
    Stein JP; Penson DF; Cai J; Miranda G; Skinner EC; Dunn MA; Groshen S; Lieskovsky G; Skinner DG
    J Urol; 2007 Mar; 177(3):876-81; discussion 881-2. PubMed ID: 17296365
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The association between extent of lymphadenectomy and survival among patients with lymph node metastases undergoing radical cystectomy.
    Wright JL; Lin DW; Porter MP
    Cancer; 2008 Jun; 112(11):2401-8. PubMed ID: 18383515
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Impact of the number of lymph nodes retrieved on outcome in patients with muscle invasive bladder cancer.
    Herr HW; Bochner BH; Dalbagni G; Donat SM; Reuter VE; Bajorin DF
    J Urol; 2002 Mar; 167(3):1295-8. PubMed ID: 11832716
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The role of lymphadenectomy in high-grade invasive bladder cancer.
    Stein JP; Skinner DG
    Urol Clin North Am; 2005 May; 32(2):187-97. PubMed ID: 15862616
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Impact of separate versus en bloc pelvic lymph node dissection on the number of lymph nodes retrieved in cystectomy specimens.
    Bochner BH; Herr HW; Reuter VE
    J Urol; 2001 Dec; 166(6):2295-6. PubMed ID: 11696756
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Superiority of ratio based lymph node staging for bladder cancer.
    Herr HW
    J Urol; 2003 Mar; 169(3):943-5. PubMed ID: 12576818
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Positive surgical margins in soft tissue following radical cystectomy for bladder cancer and cancer specific survival.
    Dotan ZA; Kavanagh K; Yossepowitch O; Kaag M; Olgac S; Donat M; Herr HW
    J Urol; 2007 Dec; 178(6):2308-12; discussion 2313. PubMed ID: 17936804
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Correlation between clinical and pathological staging in a series of radical cystectomies for bladder carcinoma.
    Ficarra V; Dalpiaz O; Alrabi N; Novara G; Galfano A; Artibani W
    BJU Int; 2005 Apr; 95(6):786-90. PubMed ID: 15794783
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Nodal involvement in bladder cancer cases treated with radical cystectomy: incidence and prognosis.
    Abdel-Latif M; Abol-Enein H; El-Baz M; Ghoneim MA
    J Urol; 2004 Jul; 172(1):85-9. PubMed ID: 15201743
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Lymphadenectomy in bladder cancer: how high is "high enough"?
    Stein JP
    Urol Oncol; 2006; 24(4):349-55. PubMed ID: 16818190
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Lymph node mapping in patients with bladder cancer undergoing radical cystectomy and lymph node dissection to the level of the inferior mesenteric artery.
    Jensen JB; Ulhøi BP; Jensen KM
    BJU Int; 2010 Jul; 106(2):199-205. PubMed ID: 20002670
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [New markers for pharmacological targeting in bladder cancer with lymph node metastasis].
    Herrmann E; Eltze E; Köpke T; Bolenz C; Bierer S; Neumann J; Hertle L; Wülfing C
    Aktuelle Urol; 2007 Sep; 38(5):392-7. PubMed ID: 17907066
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Outcomes of radical cystectomy.
    Thalmann GN; Stein JP
    BJU Int; 2008 Nov; 102(9 Pt B):1279-88. PubMed ID: 19035893
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Role of lymph node density in predicting survival of patients with lymph node metastases after radical cystectomy: a multi-institutional study.
    Osawa T; Abe T; Shinohara N; Harabayashi T; Sazawa A; Kubota K; Matsuno Y; Shibata T; Shinno Y; Kamota S; Minami K; Sakashita S; Kumagai A; Mori T; Nonomura K
    Int J Urol; 2009 Mar; 16(3):274-8; discussion 278. PubMed ID: 19087211
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Oncological and functional outcome of radical cystectomy in patients with bladder cancer and obstructive uropathy.
    Gupta NP; Kolla SB; Seth A; Hemal AK; Dogra PN; Kumar R
    J Urol; 2007 Oct; 178(4 Pt 1):1206-11; discussion 1211. PubMed ID: 17698145
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [Extended lymphadenectomy in radical cystectomy: margins, scope, methodology].
    Managadze GL; Khvadagiani GG; Tsintsadze OV; Mshvildadze ShT; Managadze LG
    Urologiia; 2006; (3):31-6. PubMed ID: 16889087
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Robot assisted extended pelvic lymphadenectomy at radical cystectomy: lymph node yield compared with second look open dissection.
    Davis JW; Gaston K; Anderson R; Dinney CP; Grossman HB; Munsell MF; Kamat AM
    J Urol; 2011 Jan; 185(1):79-83. PubMed ID: 21074799
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 19.