These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

155 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19437590)

  • 1. Adapting mini-CEX scoring to improve inter-rater reliability.
    Ogunbanjo GA
    Med Educ; 2009 May; 43(5):484-5. PubMed ID: 19437590
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Optimising feedback using the mini-CEX during the final semester programme.
    Dewi SP; Achmad TH
    Med Educ; 2010 May; 44(5):509. PubMed ID: 20374464
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. An experimental comparison of rater performance on an SP-based clinical skills exam.
    Han JJ; Kreiter CD; Park H; Ferguson KJ
    Teach Learn Med; 2006; 18(4):304-9. PubMed ID: 17144834
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. What's the problem with the mini-CEX?
    Dijksterhuis M; Schuwirth L; Braat D; Scheele F
    Med Educ; 2011 Mar; 45(3):318-9. PubMed ID: 21299607
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Internal medicine residents' perceptions of the Mini-Clinical Evaluation Exercise.
    Malhotra S; Hatala R; Courneya CA
    Med Teach; 2008; 30(4):414-9. PubMed ID: 18569664
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Assessing ophthalmoscopy skills.
    Afshar AR; Oh FS; Birnbaum AD; Namavari A; Riddle JM; Djalilian AR
    Ophthalmology; 2010 Sep; 117(9):1863, 1863.e1-2. PubMed ID: 20816257
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Inter-rater reliability and generalizability of patient note scores using a scoring rubric based on the USMLE Step-2 CS format.
    Park YS; Hyderi A; Bordage G; Xing K; Yudkowsky R
    Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract; 2016 Oct; 21(4):761-73. PubMed ID: 26757931
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comments on within-station between-sites variation.
    Pell G; Fuller R; Roberts T; Homer M
    Med Educ; 2009 Oct; 43(10):1021-2. PubMed ID: 19769654
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Implementing the undergraduate mini-CEX: a tailored approach at Southampton University.
    Hill F; Kendall K; Galbraith K; Crossley J
    Med Educ; 2009 Apr; 43(4):326-34. PubMed ID: 19335574
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Achieving inter-rater reliability in evaluation of written documentation.
    Smith J; Neely D; Hirschtick R
    Med Educ; 2009 May; 43(5):485-6. PubMed ID: 19422504
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Reliability (generalizability) of the Maastricht Skills Test.
    van der Vleuten CP; van Luyk SJ; Swanson DB
    Res Med Educ; 1988; 27():228-33. PubMed ID: 3218861
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Does scale length matter? A comparison of nine- versus five-point rating scales for the mini-CEX.
    Cook DA; Beckman TJ
    Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract; 2009 Dec; 14(5):655-64. PubMed ID: 19034679
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The utility of mini-Clinical Evaluation Exercise in undergraduate and postgraduate medical education: A BEME review: BEME Guide No. 59.
    Mortaz Hejri S; Jalili M; Masoomi R; Shirazi M; Nedjat S; Norcini J
    Med Teach; 2020 Feb; 42(2):125-142. PubMed ID: 31524016
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Factors affecting the reliability of an objective structured clinical examination (OSCE) test in neurology.
    Gledhill RF; Capatos D
    S Afr Med J; 1985 Mar; 67(12):463-7. PubMed ID: 3983727
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The construct and criterion validity of the mini-CEX: a meta-analysis of the published research.
    Al Ansari A; Ali SK; Donnon T
    Acad Med; 2013 Mar; 88(3):413-20. PubMed ID: 23348084
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Internal structure of mini-CEX scores for internal medicine residents: factor analysis and generalizability.
    Cook DA; Beckman TJ; Mandrekar JN; Pankratz VS
    Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract; 2010 Dec; 15(5):633-45. PubMed ID: 21120648
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Evaluation of a novel assessment form for observing medical residents: a randomised, controlled trial.
    Donato AA; Pangaro L; Smith C; Rencic J; Diaz Y; Mensinger J; Holmboe E
    Med Educ; 2008 Dec; 42(12):1234-42. PubMed ID: 19120955
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Global clinical performance rating, reliability and validity in an undergraduate clerkship.
    Daelmans HE; van der Hem-Stokroos HH; Hoogenboom RJ; Scherpbier AJ; Stehouwer CD; van der Vleuten CP
    Neth J Med; 2005; 63(7):279-84. PubMed ID: 16093582
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Reliability of Mini-CEX Assessment of Medical Students in General Practice Clinical Attachments.
    Eggleton K; Goodyear-Smith F; Paton L; Falloon K; Wong C; Lack L; Kennelly J; Fishman T; Moyes SA
    Fam Med; 2016 Sep; 48(8):624-30. PubMed ID: 27655195
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Developing and piloting a resource for training assessors in use of the Mini-CEX (mini clinical evaluation exercise).
    Walsh E; Foley T; Sinnott C; Boyle S; Smithson WH
    Educ Prim Care; 2017 Jul; 28(4):243-245. PubMed ID: 28110625
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.