These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

199 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19438107)

  • 1. ER: YAG laser for composite removal after bracket debonding: a qualitative SEM analysis.
    Almeida HC; Vedovello Filho M; Vedovello SA; Young AA; Ramirez-Yañez GO
    Int J Orthod Milwaukee; 2009; 20(1):9-13. PubMed ID: 19438107
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Er:YAG Laser for Metal and Ceramic Bracket Debonding: An In Vitro Study on Intrapulpal Temperature, SEM, and EDS Analysis.
    Grzech-Leśniak K; Matys J; Żmuda-Stawowiak D; Mroczka K; Dominiak M; Brugnera Junior A; Gruber R; Romanos GE; Sculean A
    Photomed Laser Surg; 2018 Nov; 36(11):595-600. PubMed ID: 29905504
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Stereomicroscope analysis of enamel surface after orthodontic bracket debonding.
    Miksić M; Slaj M; Mestrović S
    Coll Antropol; 2003; 27 Suppl 2():83-9. PubMed ID: 12971175
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The Use of the Er:YAG Laser for Bracket Debonding and Its Effect on Enamel Damage.
    Dostalova T; Jelinkova H; Remes M; Šulc J; Němec M
    Photomed Laser Surg; 2016 Sep; 34(9):394-9. PubMed ID: 27415584
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Debonding of ceramic brackets by a new scanning laser method.
    Oztoprak MO; Nalbantgil D; Erdem AS; Tozlu M; Arun T
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2010 Aug; 138(2):195-200. PubMed ID: 20691361
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Enamel loss and adhesive remnants following bracket removal and various clean-up procedures in vitro.
    Ryf S; Flury S; Palaniappan S; Lussi A; van Meerbeek B; Zimmerli B
    Eur J Orthod; 2012 Feb; 34(1):25-32. PubMed ID: 21228118
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Orthodontic bracket removal using conventional and ultrasonic debonding techniques, enamel loss, and time requirements.
    Krell KV; Courey JM; Bishara SE
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1993 Mar; 103(3):258-66. PubMed ID: 8456784
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Enamel surface morphology after bracket debonding.
    Osorio R; Toledano M; García-Godoy F
    ASDC J Dent Child; 1998; 65(5):313-7, 354. PubMed ID: 9795734
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Effects of water flow rate on shear bond strength of orthodontic bracket bonded to enamel surface after Er:YAG laser ablation.
    Topcuoglu T; Oksayan R; Ademci KE; Goymen M; Usumez S; Usumez A
    Photomed Laser Surg; 2013 Oct; 31(10):486-91. PubMed ID: 24102166
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Evaluation of enamel surface roughness after orthodontic bracket debonding with atomic force microscopy.
    Mohebi S; Shafiee HA; Ameli N
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2017 Mar; 151(3):521-527. PubMed ID: 28257737
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Evaluation of enamel surfaces after bracket debonding: an in-vivo study with scanning electron microscopy.
    Alessandri Bonetti G; Zanarini M; Incerti Parenti S; Lattuca M; Marchionni S; Gatto MR
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2011 Nov; 140(5):696-702. PubMed ID: 22051490
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Bracket bonding with 15- or 60-second etching and adhesive remaining on enamel after debonding.
    Osorio R; Toledano M; Garcia-Godoy F
    Angle Orthod; 1999 Feb; 69(1):45-8. PubMed ID: 10022184
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Differences in bonding to acid-etched or Er:YAG-laser-treated enamel and dentin surfaces.
    Martínez-Insua A; Da Silva Dominguez L; Rivera FG; Santana-Penín UA
    J Prosthet Dent; 2000 Sep; 84(3):280-8. PubMed ID: 11005900
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [Pulsed Nd:YAG laser-aided debonding for removing the metal brackets].
    Lai RF; Wang HY; Chen T; Liu XN
    Zhonghua Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2010 Jul; 45(7):407-10. PubMed ID: 21122432
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Performance of two laser motion modes versus conventional orthodontic ceramic brackets debonding technique on enamel surface topography.
    Abdulaziz A; El-Kholy MM; Bushra SS; Ali SM; Shehab KA
    Lasers Med Sci; 2024 Jun; 39(1):156. PubMed ID: 38869676
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Effects of debonding of orthodontic brackets on topography and surface roughness of composite restorations.
    Moradi M; Hormozi E; Shamohammadi M; Rakhshan V
    Int Orthod; 2018 Dec; 16(4):623-637. PubMed ID: 30343063
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Comparison of bracket debonding force between two conventional resin adhesives and a resin-reinforced glass ionomer cement: an in vitro and in vivo study.
    Shammaa I; Ngan P; Kim H; Kao E; Gladwin M; Gunel E; Brown C
    Angle Orthod; 1999 Oct; 69(5):463-9. PubMed ID: 10515145
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Removal of orthodontic bonding resin residues by CO2 laser radiation: surface effects.
    Smith SC; Walsh LJ; Taverne AA
    J Clin Laser Med Surg; 1999 Feb; 17(1):13-8. PubMed ID: 10204443
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Quantitative and qualitative assessment of enamel surface following five composite removal methods after bracket debonding.
    Hong YH; Lew KK
    Eur J Orthod; 1995 Apr; 17(2):121-8. PubMed ID: 7781720
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Enamel surface evaluation after removal of orthodontic composite remnants by intraoral sandblasting: a 3-dimensional surface profilometry study.
    Kim SS; Park WK; Son WS; Ahn HS; Ro JH; Kim YD
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2007 Jul; 132(1):71-6. PubMed ID: 17628253
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.