BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

201 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19438778)

  • 1. Comparison of the Carpentier-Edwards Perimount and St. Jude Medical Epic bioprostheses for aortic valve replacement--a retrospective echocardiographic short-term study.
    Goetzenich A; Langebartels G; Christiansen S; Hatam N; Autschbach R; Dohmen G
    J Card Surg; 2009; 24(3):260-4. PubMed ID: 19438778
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Influence of completely supra-annular placement of bioprostheses on exercise hemodynamics in patients with a small aortic annulus.
    Wagner IM; Eichinger WB; Bleiziffer S; Botzenhardt F; Gebauer I; Guenzinger R; Bauernschmitt R; Lange R
    J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2007 May; 133(5):1234-41. PubMed ID: 17467435
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Comprehensive hemodynamic comparison and frequency of patient-prosthesis mismatch between the St. Jude Medical Trifecta and Epic Bioprosthetic aortic valves.
    Yadlapati A; Diep J; Barnes M; Grogan T; Bethencourt DM; Vorobiof G
    J Am Soc Echocardiogr; 2014 Jun; 27(6):581-9. PubMed ID: 24534651
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Matched Comparison of Two Different Biological Prostheses for Complete Supra-annular Aortic Valve Replacement.
    Fiegl K; Deutsch MA; Rondak IC; Lange R; Guenzinger R
    Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2015 Sep; 63(6):459-66. PubMed ID: 25893918
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Comparison of the hemodynamic performance of percutaneous and surgical bioprostheses for the treatment of severe aortic stenosis.
    Clavel MA; Webb JG; Pibarot P; Altwegg L; Dumont E; Thompson C; De Larochellière R; Doyle D; Masson JB; Bergeron S; Bertrand OF; Rodés-Cabau J
    J Am Coll Cardiol; 2009 May; 53(20):1883-91. PubMed ID: 19442889
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The new St Jude Trifecta versus Carpentier-Edwards Perimount Magna and Magna Ease aortic bioprosthesis: is there a hemodynamic superiority?
    Wendt D; Thielmann M; Plicht B; Aßmann J; Price V; Neuhäuser M; Jakob H
    J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2014 May; 147(5):1553-60. PubMed ID: 23870159
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The effective orifice area/patient aortic annulus area ratio: a better way to compare different bioprostheses? A prospective randomized comparison of the Mosaic and Perimount bioprostheses in the aortic position.
    Eichinger WB; Botzenhardt F; Guenzinger R; Bleiziffer S; Keithahn A; Bauernschmitt R; Lange R
    J Heart Valve Dis; 2004 May; 13(3):382-8; discussion 388-9. PubMed ID: 15222284
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Sutureless Perceval aortic valve in comparison with the stented Carpentier-Edwards Perimount aortic valve.
    König KC; Wahlers T; Scherner M; Wippermann J
    J Heart Valve Dis; 2014 Mar; 23(2):253-8. PubMed ID: 25076560
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Hemodynamic performance of the Medtronic Mosaic and Perimount Magna aortic bioprostheses: five-year results of a prospectively randomized study.
    Dalmau MJ; González-Santos JM; Blázquez JA; Sastre JA; López-Rodríguez J; Bueno M; Castaño M; Arribas A
    Eur J Cardiothorac Surg; 2011 Jun; 39(6):844-52; discussion 852. PubMed ID: 21193320
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Comparison of early hemodynamic performance of 3 aortic valve bioprostheses.
    Ugur M; Suri RM; Daly RC; Dearani JA; Park SJ; Joyce LD; Burkhart HM; Greason KL; Schaff HV
    J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2014 Nov; 148(5):1940-6. PubMed ID: 24530199
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Comparison of the effects of aortic valve replacement using 19-mm Carpentier-Edwards Perimount bioprosthesis and 19-mm Medtronic Mosaic bioprosthesis.
    Tanigawa K; Eishi K; Yamachika S; Hashizume K; Tada S; Yamane K; Izumi K; Takai H; Miura T; Nakaji S
    Ann Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2008 Apr; 14(2):81-7. PubMed ID: 18414344
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Long-term results of aortic valve replacement with a small St. Jude medical valve in Japanese patients.
    Yoshikawa K; Fukunaga S; Arinaga K; Hori H; Nakamura E; Ueda T; Tayama E; Aoyagi S
    Ann Thorac Surg; 2008 Apr; 85(4):1303-8. PubMed ID: 18355515
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Long-term outcome after biologic versus mechanical aortic valve replacement in 841 patients.
    Peterseim DS; Cen YY; Cheruvu S; Landolfo K; Bashore TM; Lowe JE; Wolfe WG; Glower DD
    J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 1999 May; 117(5):890-7. PubMed ID: 10220680
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Do differences in early hemodynamic performance of current generation biologic aortic valves predict outcomes 1 year following surgery?
    Thalji NM; Suri RM; Michelena HI; Greason KL; Dearani JA; Daly RC; Joyce LD; Stulak JM; Burkhart HM; Li Z; Schaff HV
    J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2015 Jan; 149(1):163-73.e2. PubMed ID: 25439772
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The St Jude Medical Trifecta aortic pericardial valve: results from a global, multicenter, prospective clinical study.
    Bavaria JE; Desai ND; Cheung A; Petracek MR; Groh MA; Borger MA; Schaff HV
    J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2014 Feb; 147(2):590-7. PubMed ID: 23477687
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. St. Jude Trifecta versus Carpentier-Edwards Perimount Magna valves for the treatment of aortic stenosis: comparison of early Doppler-echocardiography and hemodynamic performance.
    Minardi G; Pergolini A; Zampi G; Pulignano G; Pero G; Sbaraglia F; Pino PG; Cioffi G; Musumeci F
    Monaldi Arch Chest Dis; 2013 Sep; 80(3):126-32. PubMed ID: 24818319
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Absence of prosthesis-patient mismatch with the new generation of Edwards stented aortic bioprosthesis.
    Wyss TR; Bigler M; Stalder M; Englberger L; Aymard T; Kadner A; Carrel TP
    Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg; 2010 Jun; 10(6):884-7; discussion 887-8. PubMed ID: 20233807
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Early haemodynamic performance of a latest generation supra-annular aortic bioprosthesis: experience from a large single-centre series.
    Deutsch MA; Prinzing A; Fiegl K; Wottke M; Badiu CC; Krane M; Goppel G; Bleiziffer S; Guenzinger R; Lange R
    Eur J Cardiothorac Surg; 2016 Jun; 49(6):1691-8. PubMed ID: 26656235
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The subcoronary Toronto stentless versus supra-annular Perimount stented replacement aortic valve: early clinical and hemodynamic results of a randomized comparison in 160 patients.
    Chambers JB; Rimington HM; Hodson F; Rajani R; Blauth CI
    J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2006 Apr; 131(4):878-2. PubMed ID: 16580447
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Late hemodynamic and clinical outcomes of aortic valve replacement with the Carpentier-Edwards Perimount pericardial bioprosthesis.
    Dellgren G; David TE; Raanani E; Armstrong S; Ivanov J; Rakowski H
    J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2002 Jul; 124(1):146-54. PubMed ID: 12091820
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.