165 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19438878)
1. Assessment of posterior compartment prolapse: a comparison of evacuation proctography and 3D transperineal ultrasound.
Steensma AB; Oom DM; Burger CW; Schouten WR
Colorectal Dis; 2010 Jun; 12(6):533-9. PubMed ID: 19438878
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Assessment of posterior compartment prolapse; a comparison of evacuation proctography and 3D transperineal ultrasound.
Martellucci J; Naldini G
Colorectal Dis; 2010 Aug; 12(8):834. PubMed ID: 20128840
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Integrated total pelvic floor ultrasound in pelvic floor defaecatory dysfunction.
Hainsworth AJ; Solanki D; Hamad A; Morris SJ; Schizas AM; Williams AB
Colorectal Dis; 2017 Jan; 19(1):O54-O65. PubMed ID: 27886434
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Clinical relevance of transperineal ultrasound compared with evacuation proctography for the evaluation of patients with obstructed defaecation.
Martellucci J; Naldini G
Colorectal Dis; 2011 Oct; 13(10):1167-72. PubMed ID: 20860722
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Dynamic transperineal ultrasound vs. defecography in patients with evacuatory difficulty: a pilot study.
Beer-Gabel M; Teshler M; Schechtman E; Zbar AP
Int J Colorectal Dis; 2004 Jan; 19(1):60-7. PubMed ID: 12761642
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Imaging modalities for the detection of posterior pelvic floor disorders in women with obstructed defaecation syndrome.
van Gruting IM; Stankiewicz A; Thakar R; Santoro GA; IntHout J; Sultan AH
Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2021 Sep; 9(9):CD011482. PubMed ID: 34553773
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparison of dynamic magnetic resonance defaecography with rectal contrast and conventional defaecography for posterior pelvic floor compartment prolapse.
van Iersel JJ; Formijne Jonkers HA; Verheijen PM; Broeders IA; Heggelman BG; Sreetharan V; Fütterer JJ; Somers I; van der Leest M; Consten EC
Colorectal Dis; 2017 Jan; 19(1):O46-O53. PubMed ID: 27870169
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Does 4D transperineal ultrasound have additional value over 2D transperineal ultrasound for diagnosing posterior pelvic floor disorders in women with obstructed defecation syndrome?
van Gruting IMA; Kluivers K; Sultan AH; De Bin R; Stankiewicz A; Blake H; Thakar R
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2018 Dec; 52(6):784-791. PubMed ID: 29882224
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Accuracy of Four Imaging Techniques for Diagnosis of Posterior Pelvic Floor Disorders.
van Gruting IMA; Stankiewicz A; Kluivers K; De Bin R; Blake H; Sultan AH; Thakar R
Obstet Gynecol; 2017 Nov; 130(5):1017-1024. PubMed ID: 29016504
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Pelvic prolapse: assessment with evacuation proctography (defecography).
Kelvin FM; Maglinte DD; Hornback JA; Benson JT
Radiology; 1992 Aug; 184(2):547-51. PubMed ID: 1620863
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Defecation proctography and translabial ultrasound in the investigation of defecatory disorders.
Perniola G; Shek C; Chong CC; Chew S; Cartmill J; Dietz HP
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2008 May; 31(5):567-71. PubMed ID: 18409183
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Digital rectal examination in the evaluation of rectovaginal septal defects.
Rachaneni S; Atan IK; Shek KL; Dietz HP
Int Urogynecol J; 2017 Sep; 28(9):1401-1405. PubMed ID: 28213798
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Posterior pelvic floor disorders: a prospective comparison using introital ultrasound and colpocystodefecography.
Grasso RF; Piciucchi S; Quattrocchi CC; Sammarra M; Ripetti V; Zobel BB
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2007 Jul; 30(1):86-94. PubMed ID: 17587218
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparison of dynamic transperineal ultrasound and defecography for the evaluation of pelvic floor disorders.
Beer-Gabel M; Carter D
Int J Colorectal Dis; 2015 Jun; 30(6):835-41. PubMed ID: 25820786
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Dynamic imaging of posterior compartment pelvic floor dysfunction by evacuation proctography: techniques, indications, results and limitations.
Maglinte DD; Bartram C
Eur J Radiol; 2007 Mar; 61(3):454-61. PubMed ID: 17161573
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Barium proctography vs magnetic resonance proctography for pelvic floor disorders: a comparative study.
Pilkington SA; Nugent KP; Brenner J; Harris S; Clarke A; Lamparelli M; Thomas C; Tarver D
Colorectal Dis; 2012 Oct; 14(10):1224-30. PubMed ID: 22251617
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Dynamic MR defecography of the posterior compartment: Comparison with conventional X-ray defecography.
Poncelet E; Rock A; Quinton JF; Cosson M; Ramdane N; Nicolas L; Feldmann A; Salleron J
Diagn Interv Imaging; 2017 Apr; 98(4):327-332. PubMed ID: 28089181
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Evacuation proctography (defecography): an aid to the investigation of pelvic floor disorders.
Kelvin FM; Maglinte DD; Benson JT
Obstet Gynecol; 1994 Feb; 83(2):307-14. PubMed ID: 8290201
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Defecography used as a screening entry for identifying evacuatory pelvic floor disorders in childhood constipation.
Zhang SC; Wang WL; Liu X
Clin Imaging; 2014; 38(2):115-21. PubMed ID: 24411487
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. [Dynamic MR defecography for diagnosis of combined functional disorders of the pelvic floor in proctology].
Paetzel C; Strotzer M; Fürst A; Rentsch M; Lenhart M; Feuerbach S
Rofo; 2001 May; 173(5):410-5. PubMed ID: 11414148
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
