BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

199 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19439356)

  • 1. A critical evaluation of the cost-effectiveness of radon protection methods in new homes in a radon affected area of England.
    Coskeran T; Denman A; Phillips P; Tornberg R
    Environ Int; 2009 Aug; 35(6):943-51. PubMed ID: 19439356
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A cost-effectiveness analysis of radon protection methods in domestic properties: a comparative case study in Brixworth, Northamptonshire, UK.
    Coskeran T; Denman A; Phillips P; Tornberg R
    J Environ Radioact; 2006; 91(1-2):73-89. PubMed ID: 17027126
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A new methodology for cost-effectiveness studies of domestic radon remediation programmes: quality-adjusted life-years gained within primary care trusts in central England.
    Coskeran T; Denman A; Phillips P; Gillmore G; Tornberg R
    Sci Total Environ; 2006 Jul; 366(1):32-46. PubMed ID: 16574198
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The cost-effectiveness of radon-proof membranes in new homes: a case study from Brixworth, Northamptonshire, UK.
    Coskeran T; Denman A; Phillips P; Tornberg R
    Health Policy; 2007 May; 81(2-3):195-206. PubMed ID: 16854498
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A cost-effectiveness analysis of domestic radon remediation in four primary care trusts located in Northamptonshire, UK.
    Coskeran T; Denman A; Phillips P; Tornberg R
    Health Policy; 2005 Jan; 71(1):43-56. PubMed ID: 15563992
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. An assessment of the effectiveness of UK building regulations for new homes in Radon Affected Areas.
    Denman AR; Crockett RGM; Groves-Kirkby CJ
    J Environ Radioact; 2018 Dec; 192():166-171. PubMed ID: 29982000
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Lung-cancer reduction from smoking cessation and radon remediation: a preliminary cost-analysis in Northamptonshire, UK.
    Groves-Kirkby CJ; Timson K; Shield G; Denman AR; Rogers S; Phillips PS
    Environ Int; 2011 Feb; 37(2):375-82. PubMed ID: 21109305
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The effectiveness of radon preventive and remedial measures in Irish homes.
    Long S; Fenton D; Cremin M; Morgan A
    J Radiol Prot; 2013 Mar; 33(1):141-9. PubMed ID: 23295191
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Characterization and control of radon-222 and its progeny in buildings.
    Maher EF
    Aviat Space Environ Med; 1988 Nov; 59(11 Pt 2):A93-9. PubMed ID: 3202810
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The cost effectiveness of radon reduction programmes in domestic housing in England and Wales: the impact of improved radon mapping and housing trends.
    Denman AR; Sinclair J; Phillips PS; Crockett RG; Groves-Kirkby CJ
    Environ Int; 2013 Sep; 59():73-85. PubMed ID: 23792416
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Application of the advanced radon diagnosis methods in the indoor building environment.
    Fronka A; Moucka L; Cechák T
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2008; 130(1):72-5. PubMed ID: 18390535
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The cost effectiveness of radon remediation programmes in hospitals, schools and homes in radon affected areas in the UK.
    Denman AR; Phillips PS; Tornberg R
    Sci Total Environ; 2001 May; 272(1-3):23-4. PubMed ID: 11379914
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Cost-effectiveness of countermeasures against radon in the Czech Republic: preliminary report.
    Thomas J; Tomasek L; Fojtíková I; Bernovsky P
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2008; 130(1):18-21. PubMed ID: 18420563
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Residential radon in Canada: an uncertainty analysis of population and individual lung cancer risk.
    Brand KP; Zielinski JM; Krewski D
    Risk Anal; 2005 Apr; 25(2):253-69. PubMed ID: 15876202
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Cost-benefit analyses of radon mitigation projects.
    Petersen ML; Larsen T
    J Environ Manage; 2006 Oct; 81(1):19-26. PubMed ID: 16616412
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Work to save dose: contrasting effective dose rates from radon exposure in workplaces and residences against the backdrop of public and occupational regulatory limits.
    Whicker JJ; McNaughton MW
    Health Phys; 2009 Sep; 97(3):248-56. PubMed ID: 19667808
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. An overview of Ireland's National Radon Policy.
    Long S; Fenton D
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2011 May; 145(2-3):96-100. PubMed ID: 21459876
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Evaluation and equity audit of the domestic radon programme in England.
    Zhang W; Chow Y; Meara J; Green M
    Health Policy; 2011 Sep; 102(1):81-8. PubMed ID: 21030106
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Revealed preference valuation compared to contingent valuation: radon-induced lung cancer prevention.
    Kennedy CA
    Health Econ; 2002 Oct; 11(7):585-98. PubMed ID: 12369061
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A review of the cost effectiveness of radon mitigation in domestic properties in Northamptonshire.
    Denman AR; Phillips PS
    J Radiol Prot; 1998 Jun; 18(2):119-24. PubMed ID: 9656192
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.