These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

96 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1943970)

  • 1. The safety and cost-effectiveness of low osmolar contrast media.
    Benness GT
    Med J Aust; 1991 Nov; 155(9):646-8. PubMed ID: 1943970
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The safety and cost-effectiveness of low osmolar contrast media.
    Proudfoot AD
    Med J Aust; 1991 Jul; 155(2):136. PubMed ID: 1906974
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Low osmolar (non-ionic) contrast media versus high osmolar (ionic) contrast media in intravenous urography and enhanced computerized tomography: a cost-effectiveness analysis.
    Wangsuphachart S
    Southeast Asian J Trop Med Public Health; 1991 Dec; 22(4):664-76. PubMed ID: 1820658
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The cost-effectiveness of replacing high-osmolality with low-osmolality contrast media.
    Caro JJ; Trindade E; McGregor M
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1992 Oct; 159(4):869-74. PubMed ID: 1529856
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Contrast media markdown.
    Bieze J
    Diagn Imaging (San Franc); 1996 Dec; 18(12):49-51, 54, 59. PubMed ID: 10163650
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Low vs. high osmolar contrast media.
    Knudson T
    Dimens Health Serv; 1991 Mar; 68(2):19-20. PubMed ID: 1903113
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Selective use of radiographic low-osmolality contrast media in the 1990s.
    Ellis JH; Cohan RH; Sonnad SS; Cohan NS
    Radiology; 1996 Aug; 200(2):297-311. PubMed ID: 8685315
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. High-osmolality and low-osmolality contrast agents.
    Parfrey PS; Barrett BJ
    N Engl J Med; 1992 Jul; 327(3):204-5. PubMed ID: 1608421
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Low osmolar contrast media: a quality and cost dilemma.
    Ostrander JR
    Coll Rev; 1992; 9(2):25-39. PubMed ID: 10121945
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Contrast medium-induced nephrotoxicity.
    Drescher P; Madsen PO
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1998 Feb; 170(2):508-9. PubMed ID: 9456977
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [Selection of contrast media: current status of understanding].
    Briguori C
    G Ital Cardiol (Rome); 2009 Feb; 10(2):79-87. PubMed ID: 19348144
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Conversion to nonionics packs economic punch.
    Brumbaugh J; Young SW; Cohen D
    Diagn Imaging (San Franc); 1991 Jul; 13(7):99-104. PubMed ID: 10149725
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The cost-effectiveness analysis (CEA) is dependent on the quality of the NEPHRIC study.
    Hocher B
    Am Heart J; 2006 Jan; 151(1):e5; author reply e7. PubMed ID: 16368282
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Materials managers clip contrast media costs.
    Barlow RD
    Hosp Mater Manage; 1992 Jun; 17(6):14-5. PubMed ID: 10119199
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Medical and economic considerations in using a new contrast medium.
    Fischer HW; Spataro RF; Rosenberg PM
    Arch Intern Med; 1986 Sep; 146(9):1717-21. PubMed ID: 3092757
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Universal use of low-osmolality contrast media for the 1990s.
    Radensky PW; Cahill NE
    Radiology; 1997 May; 203(2):310-1; discussion 312-5. PubMed ID: 9114079
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The adoption of low-osmolar contrast agents in the United States: historical analysis of health policy and clinical practice.
    Wilmot A; Mehta N; Jha S
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2012 Nov; 199(5):1049-53. PubMed ID: 23096178
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Cost-effectiveness and safety of selective use of low-osmolality contrast media.
    Michalson A; Franken EA; Smith W
    Acad Radiol; 1994 Sep; 1(1):59-62. PubMed ID: 9419466
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Contrast media cost analysis--I.
    Zbrozek AS
    J Am Coll Cardiol; 1994 Mar; 23(3):826; author reply 827-8. PubMed ID: 8113571
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A case for nonionic contrast media--despite the high cost.
    Lieberman EB; Bashore TM
    J Crit Illn; 1992 Dec; 7(12):1853-4, 1860. PubMed ID: 10148097
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.