These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

143 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19440029)

  • 1. Fascial interposition technique for vasectomy: is it justified?
    Shakeri S; Aminsharifi AR; Khalafi M
    Urol Int; 2009; 82(3):361-4. PubMed ID: 19440029
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Vasectomy surgical techniques in South and South East Asia.
    Labrecque M; Pile J; Sokal D; Kaza RC; Rahman M; Bodh SS; Bhattarai J; Bhatt GD; Vaidya TM
    BMC Urol; 2005 May; 5():10. PubMed ID: 15916711
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Evaluating success of no-scalpel vasectomy by ligation and excision with fascial interposition in a large prospective study in Islamic Republic of Iran.
    Farrokh-Eslamlou HR; Eslami M; Abdi-Rad I; Eilkhanizadeh B
    East Mediterr Health J; 2011 Jun; 17(6):517-22. PubMed ID: 21796970
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Strengthening vasectomy services in Rwanda: introduction of thermal cautery with fascial interposition.
    Labrecque M; Kagabo L; Shattuck D; Wesson J; Rushanika C; Tshibanbe D; Nsengiyumva T; Sokal DC
    Contraception; 2013 Mar; 87(3):375-9. PubMed ID: 22979953
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A comparison of vas occlusion techniques: cautery more effective than ligation and excision with fascial interposition.
    Sokal D; Irsula B; Chen-Mok M; Labrecque M; Barone MA
    BMC Urol; 2004 Oct; 4(1):12. PubMed ID: 15509302
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Prospective comparison of ligation and bipolar cautery technique in non-scalpel vasectomy.
    Altok M; Şahin AF; Divrik RT; Yildirim U; Zorlu F
    Int Braz J Urol; 2015; 41(6):1172-7. PubMed ID: 26742977
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. No Scalpel Vasectomy (NSV) with Ligation and Excision: A Single Centre Experience.
    Bhuyan K; Ali I; Sarma G; Das U
    Indian J Surg; 2015 Dec; 77(Suppl 3):1038-40. PubMed ID: 27011506
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Vasectomy by ligation and excision, with or without fascial interposition: a randomized controlled trial [ISRCTN77781689].
    Sokal D; Irsula B; Hays M; Chen-Mok M; Barone MA;
    BMC Med; 2004 Mar; 2():6. PubMed ID: 15056388
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Risk of vasectomy failure by ligation and excision with fascial interposition: A prospective descriptive study.
    Miranda Claro SJ; Vargas Laverde J; Mariño Samper E; Ibáñez Pinilla M; Torres Quiroz DS; Labrecque M
    Contraception; 2020 May; 101(5):342-349. PubMed ID: 32061567
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A phase II randomized controlled trial of a novel male contraception, an intra-vas device.
    Song L; Gu Y; Lu W; Liang X; Chen Z
    Int J Androl; 2006 Aug; 29(4):489-95. PubMed ID: 16573708
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Risk of post-vasectomy infections in 133,044 vasectomies from four international vasectomy practices.
    Lawton S; Hoover A; James G; Snook S; Quiroz DST; Labrecque M
    Int Braz J Urol; 2023; 49(4):490-500. PubMed ID: 37267614
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Vas deferens occlusion during no-scalpel vasectomy.
    Reynolds RD
    J Fam Pract; 1994 Dec; 39(6):577-82. PubMed ID: 7798862
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Standard incision or no-scalpel vasectomy?
    Alderman PM; Morrison GE
    J Fam Pract; 1999 Sep; 48(9):719-21. PubMed ID: 10498079
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Vasectomy occlusion technique combining thermal cautery and fascial interposition.
    Labrecque M
    Int Braz J Urol; 2011; 37(5):630-5. PubMed ID: 22099275
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Percutaneous no-scalpel vasectomy via one puncture in China.
    Li L; Shao J; Wang X
    Urol J; 2014 May; 11(2):1452-6. PubMed ID: 24807759
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Frequency and patterns of early recanalization after vasectomy.
    Labrecque M; Hays M; Chen-Mok M; Barone MA; Sokal D
    BMC Urol; 2006 Sep; 6():25. PubMed ID: 16984640
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. An evaluation of the no-scalpel vasectomy technique.
    Kumar V; Kaza RM; Singh I; Singhal S; Kumaran V
    BJU Int; 1999 Feb; 83(3):283-4. PubMed ID: 10233495
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Trends in vasectomy. Analysis of one teaching practice.
    Reynolds JL
    Can Fam Physician; 1998 Mar; 44():552-7. PubMed ID: 9559195
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Vasectomy: an update.
    Dassow P; Bennett JM
    Am Fam Physician; 2006 Dec; 74(12):2069-74. PubMed ID: 17186713
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Diagnostic accuracy of an initial azoospermic reading compared with results of post-centrifugation semen analysis after vasectomy.
    Steward B; Hays M; Sokal D
    J Urol; 2008 Nov; 180(5):2119-23. PubMed ID: 18804227
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.