These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

155 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19440417)

  • 1. The role of effective communication to enhance participation in screening mammography: a New Zealand case.
    Brunton MA
    Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2009 Feb; 6(2):844-61. PubMed ID: 19440417
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The cost-effectiveness of mammography screening: evidence from a microsimulation model for New Zealand.
    Szeto KL; Devlin NJ
    Health Policy; 1996 Nov; 38(2):101-15. PubMed ID: 10160378
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Screening mammography and public health policy: the need for perspective.
    Wright CJ; Mueller CB
    Lancet; 1995 Jul; 346(8966):29-32. PubMed ID: 7603143
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Print information to inform decisions about mammography screening participation in 16 countries with population-based programs.
    Zapka JG; Geller BM; Bulliard JL; Fracheboud J; Sancho-Garnier H; Ballard-Barbash R;
    Patient Educ Couns; 2006 Oct; 63(1-2):126-37. PubMed ID: 16962910
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Determinants of non attendance to mammography program in a region with high voluntary health insurance coverage.
    Esteva M; Ripoll J; Leiva A; Sánchez-Contador C; Collado F
    BMC Public Health; 2008 Nov; 8():387. PubMed ID: 19014522
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Mammography service screening and breast cancer mortality in New Zealand: a National Cohort Study 1999-2011.
    Morrell S; Taylor R; Roder D; Robson B; Gregory M; Craig K
    Br J Cancer; 2017 Mar; 116(6):828-839. PubMed ID: 28183141
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Mobile Mammography Participation Among Medically Underserved Women: A Systematic Review.
    Vang S; Margolies LR; Jandorf L
    Prev Chronic Dis; 2018 Nov; 15():E140. PubMed ID: 30447104
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Program-specific cost-effectiveness analysis: breast cancer screening policies for a safety-net program.
    Melnikow J; Tancredi DJ; Yang Z; Ritley D; Jiang Y; Slee C; Popova S; Rylett P; Knutson K; Smalley S
    Value Health; 2013; 16(6):932-41. PubMed ID: 24041343
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Impact of mammographic screening on ethnic and socioeconomic inequities in breast cancer stage at diagnosis and survival in New Zealand: a cohort study.
    Seneviratne S; Campbell I; Scott N; Shirley R; Lawrenson R
    BMC Public Health; 2015 Jan; 15():46. PubMed ID: 25637343
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Impact of mammography screening programmes on breast cancer mortality in Switzerland, a country with different regional screening policies.
    Herrmann C; Vounatsou P; Thürlimann B; Probst-Hensch N; Rothermundt C; Ess S
    BMJ Open; 2018 Mar; 8(3):e017806. PubMed ID: 29540406
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Factors influencing elderly women's mammography screening decisions: implications for counseling.
    Schonberg MA; McCarthy EP; York M; Davis RB; Marcantonio ER
    BMC Geriatr; 2007 Nov; 7():26. PubMed ID: 18021402
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Participation in breast screening programs: a review.
    Vernon SW; Laville EA; Jackson GL
    Soc Sci Med; 1990; 30(10):1107-18. PubMed ID: 2194294
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Barriers and missed opportunities in breast and cervical cancer screening among women aged 50 and over, New York City, 2002.
    Nash D; Chan C; Horowitz D; Vlahov D
    J Womens Health (Larchmt); 2007; 16(1):46-56. PubMed ID: 17324096
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Difficulties in implementing an organized screening program for breast cancer in Brazil with emphasis on diagnostic methods.
    Silva TB; Mauad EC; Carvalho AL; Jacobs LA; Shulman LN
    Rural Remote Health; 2013; 13(2):2321. PubMed ID: 23597169
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. One more hurdle to increasing mammography screening: pubescent, adolescent, and prior mammography screening experiences.
    Thomas E; Usher L
    Womens Health Issues; 2009; 19(6):425-33. PubMed ID: 19713125
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [Participation rates in the third round (2006-2007) of the breast cancer screening program in Hungary].
    Boncz I; Döbrõssy L; Péntek Z; Kovács A; Budai A; Vajda R; Sebestyén A
    Magy Onkol; 2013 Sep; 57(3):140-6. PubMed ID: 24107819
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [Mammography screening in Germany: how, when and why?].
    Bick U
    Rofo; 2006 Oct; 178(10):957-69. PubMed ID: 17021975
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [Methods to increase participation in cancer screening programmes].
    Giorgi Rossi P; Camilloni L; Cogo C; Federici A; Ferroni E; Furnari G; Giordano L; Grazzini G; Iossa A; Jimenez B; Palazzi M; Palazzo F; Spadea T; Senore C; Borgia P; Guasticchi G
    Epidemiol Prev; 2012 Jan; 36(1 Suppl 1):1-104. PubMed ID: 22418841
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Barriers to Organized Mammography Screening Programs in Hungary: A Questionnaire-based Study of 3,313 Women.
    Újhelyi M; Pukancsik D; Kelemen P; Kovács E; Kenessey I; Bak M; Kásler M; Kovács T; Mátrai Z
    Anticancer Res; 2018 Mar; 38(3):1727-1734. PubMed ID: 29491109
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.