These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
140 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1944062)
1. [The advantages and disadvantages of root canal measurement technics. The contribution of electronics]. Zoccola GC; Ostengo O; Fogliano F Minerva Stomatol; 1991 Jun; 40(6):449-54. PubMed ID: 1944062 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Establishing endodontic working length: a comparison of radiographic and electronic methods. Tidmarsh BG; Sherson W; Stalker NL N Z Dent J; 1985 Jul; 81(365):93-6. PubMed ID: 3865073 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Clinical evaluation of an electronic root canal measuring device. Abbott PV Aust Dent J; 1987 Feb; 32(1):17-21. PubMed ID: 3304235 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. The effect of instrumentation on root canal length as measured with an electronic device. Farber JP; Bernstein M J Endod; 1983 Mar; 9(3):114-5. PubMed ID: 6590773 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Conventional vs. electronic endodontic measurement: the Sono-Explorer. Auld CM J Hawaii Dent Assoc; 1982 Aug; 13(2):24-5. PubMed ID: 6958743 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Electronic-root canal length-measuring devices: review of the literature and clinical observations. Beatty RG; Aurelio JA Fla Dent J; 1985; 56(1):21-3. PubMed ID: 3886447 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. An in vitro model for evaluation of electronic root canal length measuring devices. Nahmias Y; Aurelio JA; Gerstein H J Endod; 1987 May; 13(5):209-14. PubMed ID: 3473176 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. [Locating the apical foramen using electronic instruments: the Neosono D]. Caramatti R; Ferrario P; Ginelli G; Pignanelli M Dent Cadmos; 1986 Feb; 54(2):83-90. PubMed ID: 3460842 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. [Clinical study of the efficacy of devices for electronic measurement of the working length]. Ricci C; Dupont AM; Laurichesse JM Rev Fr Endod; 1986 Mar; 5(1):13-26. PubMed ID: 3474721 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. [Electronic conductometry in endodontics. A developing technique]. António PS; Leopoldo FN; Carmen LP Rev Port Estomatol Cir Maxilofac; 1991; 31(4):247-51. PubMed ID: 2041976 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Problem solving in endodontic working-length determination. Gutmann JL; Leonard JE Compend Contin Educ Dent; 1995 Mar; 16(3):288, 290, 293-4 passim; quiz 304. PubMed ID: 8935000 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. [Electronic canal length determination. A clinical evaluation of the Neosono]. Kersten HW; Thoden van Velzen SK Ned Tijdschr Tandheelkd; 1985 Feb; 92(2):58-60. PubMed ID: 3858688 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. New principle and method for measuring the root canal length. Ushiyama J J Endod; 1983 Mar; 9(3):97-104. PubMed ID: 6590776 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. [Electrical adjustment of the working length of root canal instruments]. Pahncke D; Stoll N Stomatol DDR; 1985 Dec; 35(12):697-701. PubMed ID: 3870062 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. [Clinical testing of a root canal length measurement device, the Apicometer]. Sobarzo-Navarro V Quintessenz; 1984 Jul; 35(7):1303-6. PubMed ID: 6592635 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. [Endo-radar: a new electronic system for localization of the apical foramen]. Collesano V; Brusotti C; Fraternale P Dent Cadmos; 1980 May; 48(5):35-41. PubMed ID: 6935085 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. An ex vivo investigation of the relationship between apical root impedance and canal anatomy. Ardeshna SM; Flanagan M; Ng YL; Gulabivala K Int Endod J; 2011 Jun; 44(6):525-33. PubMed ID: 21306403 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]