These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

152 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19440949)

  • 21. Volume rendering with color coding of tagged stool during endoluminal fly-through CT colonography: effect on reading efficiency.
    Park SH; Lee SS; Kim JK; Kim MJ; Kim HJ; Kim SY; Kim MY; Kim AY; Ha HK
    Radiology; 2008 Sep; 248(3):1018-27. PubMed ID: 18710990
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Primary 2D versus primary 3D polyp detection at screening CT colonography.
    Pickhardt PJ; Lee AD; Taylor AJ; Michel SJ; Winter TC; Shadid A; Meiners RJ; Chase PJ; Hinshaw JL; Williams JG; Prout TM; Husain SH; Kim DH
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2007 Dec; 189(6):1451-6. PubMed ID: 18029884
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Performance of a previously validated CT colonography computer-aided detection system in a new patient population.
    Summers RM; Handwerker LR; Pickhardt PJ; Van Uitert RL; Deshpande KK; Yeshwant S; Yao J; Franaszek M
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2008 Jul; 191(1):168-74. PubMed ID: 18562741
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Lesion conspicuity and efficiency of CT colonography with electronic cleansing based on a three-material transition model.
    Serlie IW; de Vries AH; van Vliet LJ; Nio CY; Truyen R; Stoker J; Vos FM
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2008 Nov; 191(5):1493-502. PubMed ID: 18941091
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Will 3D virtual dissection display prove to be the display format for reviewing CT colonography examinations?
    Glick S
    Radiology; 2007 Sep; 244(3):629-30. PubMed ID: 17709819
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. CT colonography: effect of computer-aided detection of colonic polyps as a second and concurrent reader for general radiologists with moderate experience in CT colonography.
    Mang T; Bogoni L; Anand VX; Chandra D; Curtin AJ; Lev-Toaff AS; Hermosillo G; Noah R; Raykar V; Salganicoff M; Shaw R; Summerton S; Tappouni RF; Ringel H; Weber M; Wolf M; Obuchowski NA
    Eur Radiol; 2014 Jul; 24(7):1466-76. PubMed ID: 24816931
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. A fully automatic CAD-CTC system based on curvature analysis for standard and low-dose CT data.
    Chowdhury TA; Whelan PF; Ghita O
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2008 Mar; 55(3):888-901. PubMed ID: 18334380
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Efficacy of computer-aided detection as a second reader for 6-9-mm lesions at CT colonography: multicenter prospective trial.
    Regge D; Della Monica P; Galatola G; Laudi C; Zambon A; Correale L; Asnaghi R; Barbaro B; Borghi C; Campanella D; Cassinis MC; Ferrari R; Ferraris A; Hassan C; Golfieri R; Iafrate F; Iussich G; Laghi A; Massara R; Neri E; Sali L; Venturini S; Gandini G
    Radiology; 2013 Jan; 266(1):168-76. PubMed ID: 23151831
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Two- versus three-dimensional colon evaluation with recently developed virtual dissection software for CT colonography.
    Kim SH; Lee JM; Eun HW; Lee MW; Han JK; Lee JY; Choi BI
    Radiology; 2007 Sep; 244(3):852-64. PubMed ID: 17709833
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Comparison of axial, coronal, and primary 3D review in MDCT colonography for the detection of small polyps: a phantom study.
    Mang T; Schaefer-Prokop C; Schima W; Maier A; Schober E; Mueller-Mang C; Weber M; Prokop M
    Eur J Radiol; 2009 Apr; 70(1):86-93. PubMed ID: 18221849
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Fecal-tagging CT colonography with structure-analysis electronic cleansing for detection of colorectal flat lesions.
    Xu Y; Cai W; Nappi J; Yoshida H
    Eur J Radiol; 2012 Aug; 81(8):1712-6. PubMed ID: 21596500
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Computer-aided detection for computed tomographic colonography screening: a prospective comparison of a double-reading paradigm with first-reader computer-aided detection against second-reader computer-aided detection.
    Iussich G; Correale L; Senore C; Hassan C; Segnan N; Campanella D; Bert A; Galatola G; Laudi C; Regge D
    Invest Radiol; 2014 Mar; 49(3):173-82. PubMed ID: 24442160
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Hybrid segmentation of colon filled with air and opacified fluid for CT colonography.
    Franaszek M; Summers RM; Pickhardt PJ; Choi JR
    IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2006 Mar; 25(3):358-68. PubMed ID: 16524091
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Edge displacement field-based classification for improved detection of polyps in CT colonography.
    Acar B; Beaulieu CF; Göktürk SB; Tomasi C; Paik DS; Jeffrey RB; Yee J; Napel S
    IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2002 Dec; 21(12):1461-7. PubMed ID: 12588030
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Perceptive errors in CT colonography.
    Nio CY; de Vries AH; Stoker J
    Abdom Imaging; 2007; 32(5):556-70. PubMed ID: 17160495
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Computed tomographic colonography: assessment of radiologist performance with and without computer-aided detection.
    Halligan S; Altman DG; Mallett S; Taylor SA; Burling D; Roddie M; Honeyfield L; McQuillan J; Amin H; Dehmeshki J
    Gastroenterology; 2006 Dec; 131(6):1690-9. PubMed ID: 17087934
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Development of a cathartic-free colorectal cancer screening test using virtual colonoscopy: a feasibility study.
    Johnson KT; Carston MJ; Wentz RJ; Manduca A; Anderson SM; Johnson CD
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2007 Jan; 188(1):W29-36. PubMed ID: 17179324
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. CT colonography: investigation of the optimum reader paradigm by using computer-aided detection software.
    Taylor SA; Charman SC; Lefere P; McFarland EG; Paulson EK; Yee J; Aslam R; Barlow JM; Gupta A; Kim DH; Miller CM; Halligan S
    Radiology; 2008 Feb; 246(2):463-71. PubMed ID: 18094263
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Comparison of accuracy and time-efficiency of CT colonography between conventional and panoramic 3D interpretation methods: an anthropomorphic phantom study.
    Choi JI; Kim SH; Kim SH; Park HS; Lee JM; Lee JY; Han JK; Choi BI
    Eur J Radiol; 2011 Nov; 80(2):e68-75. PubMed ID: 20875938
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Diagnostic accuracy of translucency rendering to differentiate polyps from pseudopolyps at 3D endoluminal CT colonography: a feasibility study.
    Guerrisi A; Marin D; Laghi A; Di Martino M; Iafrate F; Iannaccone R; Catalano C; Passariello R
    Radiol Med; 2010 Aug; 115(5):758-70. PubMed ID: 20174880
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.