349 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19442889)
1. Comparison of the hemodynamic performance of percutaneous and surgical bioprostheses for the treatment of severe aortic stenosis.
Clavel MA; Webb JG; Pibarot P; Altwegg L; Dumont E; Thompson C; De Larochellière R; Doyle D; Masson JB; Bergeron S; Bertrand OF; Rodés-Cabau J
J Am Coll Cardiol; 2009 May; 53(20):1883-91. PubMed ID: 19442889
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Left ventricular reverse remodeling in percutaneous and surgical aortic bioprostheses: an echocardiographic study.
Giannini C; Petronio AS; Nardi C; De Carlo M; Guarracino F; Delle Donne MG; Talini E; Minzioni G; Bortolotti U; Cucco C; Marzilli M; Di Bello V
J Am Soc Echocardiogr; 2011 Jan; 24(1):28-36. PubMed ID: 20850946
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Hemodynamic performance and outcome of percutaneous versus surgical stentless bioprostheses for aortic stenosis with anticipated patient-prosthesis mismatch.
Finkelstein A; Schwartz AL; Uretzky G; Banai S; Keren G; Kramer A; Topilsky Y
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2014 Jun; 147(6):1892-9. PubMed ID: 23993320
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparison of hemodynamic performance of self-expandable CoreValve versus balloon-expandable Edwards SAPIEN aortic valves inserted by catheter for aortic stenosis.
Nombela-Franco L; Ruel M; Radhakrishnan S; Webb JG; Hansen M; Labinaz M; Thompson C; Fremes S; Dumont E; DeLarochellière R; Doyle D; Urena M; Mok M; Ribeiro HB; Roifman I; Watkins S; Dumesnil JG; Pibarot P; Rodés-Cabau J
Am J Cardiol; 2013 Apr; 111(7):1026-33. PubMed ID: 23351465
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Early hemodynamic and neurohormonal response after transcatheter aortic valve implantation.
Sherif MA; Abdel-Wahab M; Awad O; Geist V; El-Shahed G; Semmler R; Tawfik M; Khattab AA; Richardt D; Richardt G; Tölg R
Am Heart J; 2010 Nov; 160(5):862-9. PubMed ID: 21095273
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Influence of completely supra-annular placement of bioprostheses on exercise hemodynamics in patients with a small aortic annulus.
Wagner IM; Eichinger WB; Bleiziffer S; Botzenhardt F; Gebauer I; Guenzinger R; Bauernschmitt R; Lange R
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2007 May; 133(5):1234-41. PubMed ID: 17467435
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Hemodynamic comparison of bioprostheses for complete supra-annular position in patients with small aortic annulus.
Botzenhardt F; Eichinger WB; Bleiziffer S; Guenzinger R; Wagner IM; Bauernschmitt R; Lange R
J Am Coll Cardiol; 2005 Jun; 45(12):2054-60. PubMed ID: 15963409
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Comparison between transcatheter and surgical prosthetic valve implantation in patients with severe aortic stenosis and reduced left ventricular ejection fraction.
Clavel MA; Webb JG; Rodés-Cabau J; Masson JB; Dumont E; De Larochellière R; Doyle D; Bergeron S; Baumgartner H; Burwash IG; Dumesnil JG; Mundigler G; Moss R; Kempny A; Bagur R; Bergler-Klein J; Gurvitch R; Mathieu P; Pibarot P
Circulation; 2010 Nov; 122(19):1928-36. PubMed ID: 20975002
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Hemodynamic performance of the Medtronic Mosaic and Perimount Magna aortic bioprostheses: five-year results of a prospectively randomized study.
Dalmau MJ; González-Santos JM; Blázquez JA; Sastre JA; López-Rodríguez J; Bueno M; Castaño M; Arribas A
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg; 2011 Jun; 39(6):844-52; discussion 852. PubMed ID: 21193320
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A prospective, randomized comparison of 3 contemporary bioprosthetic aortic valves: should hemodynamic performance influence device selection?
Suri RM; Michelena HI; Burkhart HM; Greason KL; Daly RC; Dearani JA; Park SJ; Joyce LD; Stulak JM; Sundt TM; Li Z; Schaff HV
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2012 Dec; 144(6):1387-95, 1398; discussion 1395-7. PubMed ID: 23140964
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Efficacy of Stentless Aortic Bioprosthesis Implantation for Aortic Stenosis with Small Aortic Annulus.
Murashita T; Okada Y; Kanemitsu H; Fukunaga N; Konishi Y; Nakamura K; Koyama T
Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2015 Sep; 63(6):446-51. PubMed ID: 25191762
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Surgical sutureless and transcatheter aortic valves: hemodynamic performance and clinical outcomes in propensity score-matched high-risk populations with severe aortic stenosis.
Kamperidis V; van Rosendael PJ; de Weger A; Katsanos S; Regeer M; van der Kley F; Mertens B; Sianos G; Ajmone Marsan N; Bax JJ; Delgado V
JACC Cardiovasc Interv; 2015 Apr; 8(5):670-7. PubMed ID: 25946438
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparison of the Carpentier-Edwards Perimount and St. Jude Medical Epic bioprostheses for aortic valve replacement--a retrospective echocardiographic short-term study.
Goetzenich A; Langebartels G; Christiansen S; Hatam N; Autschbach R; Dohmen G
J Card Surg; 2009; 24(3):260-4. PubMed ID: 19438778
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Do differences in early hemodynamic performance of current generation biologic aortic valves predict outcomes 1 year following surgery?
Thalji NM; Suri RM; Michelena HI; Greason KL; Dearani JA; Daly RC; Joyce LD; Stulak JM; Burkhart HM; Li Z; Schaff HV
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2015 Jan; 149(1):163-73.e2. PubMed ID: 25439772
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Comparison of early hemodynamic performance of 3 aortic valve bioprostheses.
Ugur M; Suri RM; Daly RC; Dearani JA; Park SJ; Joyce LD; Burkhart HM; Greason KL; Schaff HV
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2014 Nov; 148(5):1940-6. PubMed ID: 24530199
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The new St Jude Trifecta versus Carpentier-Edwards Perimount Magna and Magna Ease aortic bioprosthesis: is there a hemodynamic superiority?
Wendt D; Thielmann M; Plicht B; Aßmann J; Price V; Neuhäuser M; Jakob H
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2014 May; 147(5):1553-60. PubMed ID: 23870159
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Matched Comparison of Two Different Biological Prostheses for Complete Supra-annular Aortic Valve Replacement.
Fiegl K; Deutsch MA; Rondak IC; Lange R; Guenzinger R
Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2015 Sep; 63(6):459-66. PubMed ID: 25893918
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The Toronto root stentless valve in the subcoronary position is hemodynamically superior to the mosaic stented completely supra-annular bioprosthesis.
Bleiziffer S; Eichinger WB; Wagner I; Guenzinger R; Bauernschmitt R; Lange R
J Heart Valve Dis; 2005 Nov; 14(6):814-21; discussion 821. PubMed ID: 16359064
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Hemodynamic performance of stented and stentless aortic bioprostheses.
Milano AD; Blanzola C; Mecozzi G; D'Alfonso A; De Carlo M; Nardi C; Bortolotti U
Ann Thorac Surg; 2001 Jul; 72(1):33-8. PubMed ID: 11465226
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Stentless valves versus stented bioprostheses at the aortic position: midterm results.
Narang S; Satsangi DK; Banerjee A; Geelani MA
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2008 Oct; 136(4):943-7. PubMed ID: 18954634
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
