252 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19443160)
1. Pelvimetry revisited: analyzing cephalopelvic disproportion.
Lenhard MS; Johnson TR; Weckbach S; Nikolaou K; Friese K; Hasbargen U
Eur J Radiol; 2010 Jun; 74(3):e107-11. PubMed ID: 19443160
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Magnetic resonance imaging pelvimetry and the prediction of labor dystocia.
Zaretsky MV; Alexander JM; McIntire DD; Hatab MR; Twickler DM; Leveno KJ
Obstet Gynecol; 2005 Nov; 106(5 Pt 1):919-26. PubMed ID: 16260507
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Assessing cephalopelvic disproportion: back to the basics.
Maharaj D
Obstet Gynecol Surv; 2010 Jun; 65(6):387-95. PubMed ID: 20633305
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. MR imaging pelvimetry: a useful adjunct in the treatment of women at risk for dystocia?
Spörri S; Thoeny HC; Raio L; Lachat R; Vock P; Schneider H
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2002 Jul; 179(1):137-44. PubMed ID: 12076922
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Pelvimetry by magnetic resonance imaging as a diagnostic tool to evaluate dystocia.
Spörri S; Hänggi W; Braghetti A; Vock P; Schneider H
Obstet Gynecol; 1997 Jun; 89(6):902-8. PubMed ID: 9170462
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. MR pelvimetry: prognosis for successful vaginal delivery in patients with suspected fetopelvic disproportion or breech presentation at term.
Franz M; von Bismarck A; Delius M; Ertl-Wagner B; Deppe C; Mahner S; Hasbargen U; Hübener C
Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2017 Feb; 295(2):351-359. PubMed ID: 28044181
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Three-dimensional magnetic resonance pelvimetry: A new technique for evaluating the female pelvis in pregnancy.
Liao KD; Yu YH; Li YG; Chen L; Peng C; Liu P; Chen CL; Chen RY; Zhong M; Wang Y
Eur J Radiol; 2018 May; 102():208-212. PubMed ID: 29685537
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A safe, low-cost, easy-to-use 3D camera platform to assess risk of obstructed labor due to cephalopelvic disproportion.
Gleason RL; Yigeremu M; Debebe T; Teklu S; Zewdeneh D; Weiler M; Frank N; Tolentino L; Attia S; Dixon JB; Kwon C; Pokutta-Paskaleva A; Gleason KA
PLoS One; 2018; 13(9):e0203865. PubMed ID: 30216374
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. [Fetal-pelvic disproportion and X-ray pelvimetry].
Frémondière P; Fournié A
Gynecol Obstet Fertil; 2011 Jan; 39(1):8-11. PubMed ID: 21185760
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Fetal pelvic index to predict cephalopelvic disproportion - a retrospective clinical cohort study.
Korhonen U; Taipale P; Heinonen S
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2015 Jun; 94(6):615-21. PubMed ID: 25682690
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Maternal height and external pelvimetry to predict cephalopelvic disproportion in nulliparous African women: a cohort study.
Liselele HB; Boulvain M; Tshibangu KC; Meuris S
BJOG; 2000 Aug; 107(8):947-52. PubMed ID: 10955423
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. [Methods, techniques and assessment criteria in obstetric pelvimetry].
Spörri S; Gyr T; Schollerer A; Werlen S; Schneider H
Z Geburtshilfe Perinatol; 1994; 198(2):37-46. PubMed ID: 8023529
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The cephalopelvic disproportion index. Combined fetal sonography and x-ray pelvimetry for early detection of cephalopelvic disproportion.
Abitbol MM; Taylor UB; Castillo I; Rochelson BL
J Reprod Med; 1991 May; 36(5):369-73. PubMed ID: 2061886
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. An evaluation of the usefulness of x-ray pelvimetry: comparison of the Thoms and modified Ball methods with manual pelvimetry.
Fine EA; Bracken M; Berkowitz RL
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1980 May; 137(1):15-20. PubMed ID: 7369283
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. [Development of CT Pelvimetry Using Deep Learning Based Reconstruction].
Kitai T; Hyodo Y; Morikawa H
Nihon Hoshasen Gijutsu Gakkai Zasshi; 2020; 76(1):16-25. PubMed ID: 31956183
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Severe shoulder dystocia with a small-for-gestationaI-age infant: a case report.
Ruis KA; Allen RH; Gurewitsch ED
J Reprod Med; 2011; 56(3-4):178-80. PubMed ID: 21542540
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Anthropometric measurements in the diagnosis of pelvic size: an analysis of maternal height and shoe size and computed tomography pelvimetric data.
Awonuga AO; Merhi Z; Awonuga MT; Samuels TA; Waller J; Pring D
Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2007 Nov; 276(5):523-8. PubMed ID: 17458554
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. [Caesarean section for cephalo-pelvic disproportion performed without evidence. Does the radiological pelvimetry has a place in obstetrics today?].
Santín G
Ginecol Obstet Mex; 2011 Jun; 79(6):368-72. PubMed ID: 21966828
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. [Prediction of cephalopelvic disproportion by ultrasonographic cephalopelic].
Bian X; Zhuang J; Cheng X
Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 1998 Sep; 33(9):533-5. PubMed ID: 10806728
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The diagnostic accuracy of pelvic measurements: threshold values and fetal size.
Korhonen U; Taipale P; Heinonen S
Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2014 Oct; 290(4):643-8. PubMed ID: 24816688
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
