260 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19443346)
1. Hospital-based stroke rehabilitation in the United States.
Conroy BE; DeJong G; Horn SD
Top Stroke Rehabil; 2009; 16(1):34-43. PubMed ID: 19443346
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Reliability and Validity of the Inpatient Rehabilitation Facility Discharge Mobility and Self-Care Quality Measures.
Deutsch A; Palmer L; Vaughan M; McMullen T; Kwon S; Karmarkar A; Ingber MJ
J Am Med Dir Assoc; 2023 May; 24(5):723-728.e4. PubMed ID: 37030324
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. A description of the outcomes, frequency, duration, and intensity of occupational, physical, and speech therapy in inpatient stroke rehabilitation.
Karges J; Smallfied S
J Allied Health; 2009; 38(1):E1-10. PubMed ID: 19753406
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Did the Medicare inpatient rehabilitation facility prospective payment system result in changes in relative patient severity and relative resource use?
Paddock SM; Escarce JJ; Hayden O; Buntin MB
Med Care; 2007 Feb; 45(2):123-30. PubMed ID: 17224774
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The early impact of the inpatient rehabilitation facility prospective payment system on stroke rehabilitation case mix, practice patterns, and outcomes.
DeJong G; Horn SD; Smout RJ; Ryser DK
Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 2005 Dec; 86(12 Suppl 2):S93-S100. PubMed ID: 16373144
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Characteristics and Outcomes of Medicare Patients Treated in Inpatient Rehabilitation Facilities: 2013-2018.
Deutsch A; Palmer L; Neumann H; Potelle J; Ignaczak M; McMullen T; Ingber MJ
Rehabil Nurs; 2023 May-Jun 01; 48(3):109-121. PubMed ID: 37133331
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Poststroke rehabilitation: outcomes and reimbursement of inpatient rehabilitation facilities and subacute rehabilitation programs.
Deutsch A; Granger CV; Heinemann AW; Fiedler RC; DeJong G; Kane RL; Ottenbacher KJ; Naughton JP; Trevisan M
Stroke; 2006 Jun; 37(6):1477-82. PubMed ID: 16627797
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Modifications of the FIM instrument under the inpatient rehabilitation facility prospective payment system.
Granger CV; Deutsch A; Russell C; Black T; Ottenbacher KJ
Am J Phys Med Rehabil; 2007 Nov; 86(11):883-92. PubMed ID: 17873825
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A new approach to patient-centered care.
Newman E; Ellis C; Foley M; Hendricks J
Top Stroke Rehabil; 2005; 12(2):57-64. PubMed ID: 15940585
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A comparison of stroke rehabilitation practice and outcomes between New Zealand and United States facilities.
McNaughton H; DeJong G; Smout RJ; Melvin JL; Brandstater M
Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 2005 Dec; 86(12 Suppl 2):S115-S120. PubMed ID: 16373146
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The brain recovery core: building a system of organized stroke rehabilitation and outcomes assessment across the continuum of care.
Lang CE; Bland MD; Connor LT; Fucetola R; Whitson M; Edmiaston J; Karr C; Sturmoski A; Baty J; Corbetta M
J Neurol Phys Ther; 2011 Dec; 35(4):194-201. PubMed ID: 22027474
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Impact of state Medicaid coverage on utilization of inpatient rehabilitation facilities among patients with stroke.
Skolarus LE; Burke JF; Morgenstern LB; Meurer WJ; Adelman EE; Kerber KA; Callaghan BC; Lisabeth LD
Stroke; 2014 Aug; 45(8):2472-4. PubMed ID: 25005437
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Freestanding inpatient rehabilitation facility performance following the 60 percent rule: a matter of fit.
Shay PD; Ozcan YA
Med Care Res Rev; 2013 Feb; 70(1):46-67. PubMed ID: 22813722
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Team functioning and patient outcomes in stroke rehabilitation.
Strasser DC; Falconer JA; Herrin JS; Bowen SE; Stevens AB; Uomoto J
Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 2005 Mar; 86(3):403-9. PubMed ID: 15759219
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Outcomes study suggests subacute SNFs may be providing too much therapy for hip patients but not enough for stroke victims.
Natl Rep Subacute Care; 1997 Feb; 5(4):4-5. PubMed ID: 10165203
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Inpatient rehabilitation facilities under the prospective payment system: lessons learned.
Zorowitz RD
Eur J Phys Rehabil Med; 2009 Jun; 45(2):259-63. PubMed ID: 19532112
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Antiplatelet and anticoagulant medication usage during stroke rehabilitation: the Post-Stroke Rehabilitation Outcomes Project (PSROP).
Zorowitz RD; Smout RJ; Gassaway JA; Horn SD
Top Stroke Rehabil; 2005; 12(4):11-9. PubMed ID: 16698733
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Organizational and market factors associated with Medicare dependence in inpatient rehabilitation hospitals.
Thompson JM; McCue MJ
Health Serv Manage Res; 2004 Feb; 17(1):13-23. PubMed ID: 15006083
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Medicare program; inpatient rehabilitation facility prospective payment system for federal fiscal year 2014. Final rule.
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), HHS
Fed Regist; 2013 Aug; 78(151):47859-934. PubMed ID: 23923144
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Mandated Quality of Care Metrics for Medicare Patients: Examining New or Worsened Pressure Ulcers and Rehabilitation Outcomes in United States Inpatient Rehabilitation Facilities.
DiVita MA; Granger CV; Goldstein R; Niewczyk PM; Freudenheim JL
Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 2018 Aug; 99(8):1514-1524.e1. PubMed ID: 29649450
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
