196 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19443369)
1. DNA image cytometry in the differential diagnosis of benign and malignant lesions of the bile duct, the pancreatic duct and the papilla of Vater.
Biesterfeld S; Deacu L
Anticancer Res; 2009 May; 29(5):1579-84. PubMed ID: 19443369
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Differential diagnosis and evaluation of the clinical course of transurethrally resected T1G3 urothelial carcinoma of the bladder by DNA image cytometry.
Biesterfeld S; Borchers H; Jellouschek H; Bono AV; Altwein JE; Algaba F; Jakse G
Anticancer Res; 2005; 25(5):3243-9. PubMed ID: 16101134
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Duodenoscopic guided biopsy of the biliary and pancreatic duct.
Seifert E; Urakami Y; Elster K
Endoscopy; 1977 Aug; 9(3):154-61. PubMed ID: 913368
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Endoscopic retrograde brush cytology (ERBC) of the biliary and pancreatic ducts.
Osnes M; Serck-Hanssen A; Myren J
Scand J Gastroenterol; 1975; 10(8):829-31. PubMed ID: 1202615
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. DNA image cytometry in the differential diagnosis of endometrial hyperplasia and adenocarcinoma.
Biesterfeld S; Leitloff M; Rath W; Schröder W
Anal Quant Cytol Histol; 2001 Apr; 23(2):123-8. PubMed ID: 11332078
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Multiparameter digital image analysis of biliary, ampullary, and pancreatic adenocarcinomas.
Yeaton P; Kiss R; DePrez C; Salmon I; Pasteels JL; Jones RS; Frierson HF
Mod Pathol; 1995 Oct; 8(8):843-7. PubMed ID: 8552573
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Pancreatic and bile duct brushing cytology in 1000 cases: review of findings and comparison of preparation methods.
Volmar KE; Vollmer RT; Routbort MJ; Creager AJ
Cancer; 2006 Aug; 108(4):231-8. PubMed ID: 16541448
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Relationship between the survival and the clinicopathological parameters of the patients with tumors in the pancreatic head region.
Berczi C; Bocsi J; Lapis K; Balázs G
Acta Chir Hung; 1999; 38(3-4):235-41. PubMed ID: 10935131
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The value of biliary amylase and Hepatocarcinoma-Intestine-Pancreas/Pancreatitis-associated Protein I (HIP/PAP-I) in diagnosing biliary malignancies.
Chen CY; Lin XZ; Wu HC; Shiesh SC
Clin Biochem; 2005 Jun; 38(6):520-5. PubMed ID: 15885230
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Brush cytology of the papilla of Vater.
Witte S
Scand J Gastroenterol Suppl; 1979; 54():55-8. PubMed ID: 295505
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Ki-ras mutations in codon 12 and p53 mutations (biomarkers) and cytology in bile in patients with hepatobiliary-pancreatic carcinoma.
Yamaguchi K; Nakano K; Nagai E; Chijiiwa K; Kinoshita M; Ohta M; Tanaka M
Hepatogastroenterology; 2005; 52(63):713-8. PubMed ID: 15966189
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The value of DNA image cytometry for the cytological diagnosis of well-differentiated breast carcinomas and benign lesions.
Seigneurin D; Louis J; Villoud MC
Anal Cell Pathol; 1994 Aug; 7(2):115-25. PubMed ID: 7993822
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. A collision tumor composed of cancers of the bile duct and ampulla of Vater--immunohistochemical analysis of a rare entity of double cancer.
Hirono S; Tani M; Terasawa H; Kawai M; Ina S; Uchiyama K; Nakamura Y; Kakudo K; Yamaue H
Hepatogastroenterology; 2008; 55(84):861-4. PubMed ID: 18705284
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. [Intestinal brushing. Technical-cytological contribution in the pathological study of Vater's ampulla, common bile duct, and pancreatic system].
Villanacci V; Padova E; Bonardi M; Favret M; Ravelli P; Missale G; Cestari R
Pathologica; 1999 Dec; 91(6):453-8. PubMed ID: 10783641
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Comparative studies of nuclear DNA content in benign and malignant thyroid lesions.
Konarska L; Skierski J; Ellert A; Steinbrich J; Woźniak A; Kalczak M
Acta Biochim Pol; 2001; 48(3):783-93. PubMed ID: 11833787
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Trypsinogen activation peptide (TAP) expression in gallbladder bile identifies bilio-pancreatic carcinoma.
Brockmann JG; Hernandez CA; Emparan C; Wolters H; Haier J; Dietl KH; Senninger NJ
Anticancer Res; 2003; 23(2A):819-25. PubMed ID: 12820306
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Diagnostic and prognostic implications of DNA ploidy and S-phase evaluation in the assessment of malignancy in biliary strictures.
Lindberg B; Enochsson L; Tribukait B; Arnelo U; Bergquist A
Endoscopy; 2006 Jun; 38(6):561-5. PubMed ID: 16802266
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. [Endoscopic diagnosis of cancer of the major duodenal papilla].
Kuvshinov IuP; Poddubnyĭ BK; Rotenberg VI
Klin Med (Mosk); 1978 May; 56(5):40-3. PubMed ID: 661195
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Another dimension in magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography: comparison of 2- and 3-dimensional magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography for the evaluation of intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm of the pancreas.
Yoon LS; Catalano OA; Fritz S; Ferrone CR; Hahn PF; Sahani DV
J Comput Assist Tomogr; 2009; 33(3):363-8. PubMed ID: 19478628
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Adenomyoma of the papilla of Vater.
Ulich TR; Kollin M; Simmons GE; Wilczynski SP; Waxman K
Arch Pathol Lab Med; 1987 Apr; 111(4):388-90. PubMed ID: 3827548
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
