These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

204 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1944342)

  • 21. Structural alerts to genotoxicity: the interaction of human and artificial intelligence.
    Rosenkranz HS; Klopman G
    Mutagenesis; 1990 Jul; 5(4):333-61. PubMed ID: 2398817
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. An analysis by chemical class of Salmonella mutagenicity tests as predictors of animal carcinogenicity.
    Claxton LD; Stead AG; Walsh D
    Mutat Res; 1988; 205(1-4):197-225. PubMed ID: 3285187
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. How to reduce false positive results when undertaking in vitro genotoxicity testing and thus avoid unnecessary follow-up animal tests: Report of an ECVAM Workshop.
    Kirkland D; Pfuhler S; Tweats D; Aardema M; Corvi R; Darroudi F; Elhajouji A; Glatt H; Hastwell P; Hayashi M; Kasper P; Kirchner S; Lynch A; Marzin D; Maurici D; Meunier JR; Müller L; Nohynek G; Parry J; Parry E; Thybaud V; Tice R; van Benthem J; Vanparys P; White P
    Mutat Res; 2007 Mar; 628(1):31-55. PubMed ID: 17293159
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Comparison between rodent carcinogenicity test results of 44 chemicals and a number of predictive systems.
    Lewis DF
    Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 1994 Dec; 20(3 Pt 1):215-22. PubMed ID: 7724831
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Guidelines for the evaluation of chemicals for carcinogenicity. Committee on Carcinogenicity of Chemicals in Food, Consumer Products and the Environment.
    Rep Health Soc Subj (Lond); 1991; 42():1-80. PubMed ID: 1763238
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. SOS chromotest results in a broader context: empirical relationships between genotoxic potency, mutagenic potency, and carcinogenic potency.
    White PA; Rasmussen JB
    Environ Mol Mutagen; 1996; 27(4):270-305. PubMed ID: 8665872
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Performance of 133 compounds in the lambda prophage induction endpoint of the Microscreen assay and a comparison with S. typhimurium mutagenicity and rodent carcinogenicity assays.
    Rossman TG; Molina M; Meyer L; Boone P; Klein CB; Wang Z; Li F; Lin WC; Kinney PL
    Mutat Res; 1991 Aug; 260(4):349-67. PubMed ID: 1831244
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Use of a composite polyfunctional model electrophile as a probe to analyze the performance of an artificial intelligence structure-activity method.
    Rosenkranz HS; Klopman G
    Mutat Res; 1990 Oct; 232(2):249-60. PubMed ID: 2215535
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Prediction of rodent carcinogenicity for 44 chemicals: results.
    Ashby J; Tennant RW
    Mutagenesis; 1994 Jan; 9(1):7-15. PubMed ID: 8208133
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Artificial intelligence and Bayesian decision theory in the prediction of chemical carcinogens.
    Rosenkranz HS; Mitchell CS; Klopman G
    Mutat Res; 1985; 150(1-2):1-11. PubMed ID: 3889611
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Mathematical parameters for quantification of mutational responses in bacteria.
    Roldán-Arjona T; Pueyo C; Haynes RH
    Mutat Res; 1995 Feb; 346(2):77-84. PubMed ID: 7885403
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. The alkaline single cell gel electrophoresis assay with mouse multiple organs: results with 30 aromatic amines evaluated by the IARC and U.S. NTP.
    Sasaki YF; Fujikawa K; Ishida K; Kawamura N; Nishikawa Y; Ohta S; Satoh M; Madarame H; Ueno S; Susa N; Matsusaka N; Tsuda S
    Mutat Res; 1999 Mar; 440(1):1-18. PubMed ID: 10095124
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. A core in vitro genotoxicity battery comprising the Ames test plus the in vitro micronucleus test is sufficient to detect rodent carcinogens and in vivo genotoxins.
    Kirkland D; Reeve L; Gatehouse D; Vanparys P
    Mutat Res; 2011 Mar; 721(1):27-73. PubMed ID: 21238603
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Identification of rodent carcinogens by an expert system.
    Rosenkranz HS; Klopman G
    Prog Clin Biol Res; 1990; 340B():23-48. PubMed ID: 2203007
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Mouse-specific carcinogens: an assessment of hazard and significance for validation of short-term carcinogenicity bioassays in transgenic mice.
    Battershill JM; Fielder RJ
    Hum Exp Toxicol; 1998 Apr; 17(4):193-205. PubMed ID: 9617631
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Series: 'Current issues in mutagenesis and carcinogenesis.' No. 42. Strategies and philosophies of genotoxicity testing: what is the question?
    Zeiger E
    Mutat Res; 1994 Jan; 304(2):309-14. PubMed ID: 7506375
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Response of the ke test to NCI/NTP-screened chemicals. I. Non-genotoxic carcinogens and genotoxic non-carcinogens.
    Bakale G; McCreary RD
    Carcinogenesis; 1990 Oct; 11(10):1811-8. PubMed ID: 2208594
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. The structural basis of the mutagenicity of chemicals in Salmonella typhimurium: the National Toxicology Program Data Base.
    Rosenkranz HS; Klopman G
    Mutat Res; 1990 Jan; 228(1):51-80. PubMed ID: 2405260
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Genotoxicity and carcinogenicity of glycidyl ethers.
    Hopkins J
    Food Chem Toxicol; 1984 Sep; 22(9):780-3. PubMed ID: 6386633
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Mechanistic relationship among mutagenicity, skin sensitization, and skin carcinogenicity.
    Ashby J; Hilton J; Dearman RJ; Callander RD; Kimber I
    Environ Health Perspect; 1993 Apr; 101(1):62-7. PubMed ID: 8513766
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.