198 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19443709)
1. Systematic review of oocyte donation: investigating attitudes, motivations and experiences.
Purewal S; van den Akker OB
Hum Reprod Update; 2009; 15(5):499-515. PubMed ID: 19443709
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Investigating psychosocial attitudes, motivations and experiences of oocyte donors, recipients and egg sharers: a systematic review.
Bracewell-Milnes T; Saso S; Bora S; Ismail AM; Al-Memar M; Hamed AH; Abdalla H; Thum MY
Hum Reprod Update; 2016 Jun; 22(4):450-65. PubMed ID: 27016289
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Investigating attitudes towards oocyte donation amongst potential donors and the general population: a systematic review.
Platts S; Bracewell-Milnes T; Saso S; Jones B; Parikh R; Thum MY
Hum Fertil (Camb); 2021 Jul; 24(3):169-181. PubMed ID: 30982353
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Attitudes of anonymous and identity-release oocyte donors towards future contact with donor offspring.
Miettinen A; Rotkirch A; Suikkari AM; Söderström-Anttila V
Hum Reprod; 2019 Apr; 34(4):672-678. PubMed ID: 30805634
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Attitudes and intentions towards volunteer oocyte donation.
Purewal S; van den Akker OB
Reprod Biomed Online; 2009; 19 Suppl 1():19-26. PubMed ID: 19622246
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Attitudes towards disclosure and relationship to donor offspring among a national cohort of identity-release oocyte and sperm donors.
Lampic C; Skoog Svanberg A; Sydsjö G
Hum Reprod; 2014 Sep; 29(9):1978-86. PubMed ID: 25030191
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. A systematic review of sperm donors: demographic characteristics, attitudes, motives and experiences of the process of sperm donation.
Van den Broeck U; Vandermeeren M; Vanderschueren D; Enzlin P; Demyttenaere K; D'Hooghe T
Hum Reprod Update; 2013; 19(1):37-51. PubMed ID: 23146866
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Factors contributing to parental decision-making in disclosing donor conception: a systematic review.
Indekeu A; Dierickx K; Schotsmans P; Daniels KR; Rober P; D'Hooghe T
Hum Reprod Update; 2013; 19(6):714-33. PubMed ID: 23814103
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Socio-demographic and fertility-related characteristics and motivations of oocyte donors in eleven European countries.
Pennings G; de Mouzon J; Shenfield F; Ferraretti AP; Mardesic T; Ruiz A; Goossens V
Hum Reprod; 2014 May; 29(5):1076-89. PubMed ID: 24626802
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Attitudes of different groups of women in Sweden to oocyte donation and oocyte research.
Westlander G; Janson PO; Tägnfors U; Bergh C
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 1998 Mar; 77(3):317-21. PubMed ID: 9539279
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Short- and long-term health consequences and current satisfaction levels for altruistic anonymous, identity-release and known oocyte donors.
Söderström-Anttila V; Miettinen A; Rotkirch A; Nuojua-Huttunen S; Poranen AK; Sälevaara M; Suikkari AM
Hum Reprod; 2016 Mar; 31(3):597-606. PubMed ID: 26724795
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Disposition intentions of elective egg freezers toward their surplus frozen oocytes: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Caughey LE; Lensen S; White KM; Peate M
Fertil Steril; 2021 Dec; 116(6):1601-1619. PubMed ID: 34452749
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Exploring motivations, attitudes and experiences of oocyte donors: A qualitative study.
Borgstrøm MB; Nygaard SS; Danielsen AK; Kesmodel US
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2019 Aug; 98(8):1055-1062. PubMed ID: 30779111
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. British women's attitudes towards oocyte donation: ethnic differences and altruism.
Purewal S; van den Akker OB
Patient Educ Couns; 2006 Dec; 64(1-3):43-9. PubMed ID: 16427244
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Attitudes and intention to donate oocytes for research.
Purewal S; van den Akker O
Fertil Steril; 2010 Mar; 93(4):1080-7. PubMed ID: 19135662
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Ethics of oocyte banking for third-party assisted reproduction: a systematic review.
Kool EM; Bos AME; van der Graaf R; Fauser BCJM; Bredenoord AL
Hum Reprod Update; 2018 Sep; 24(5):615-635. PubMed ID: 29762669
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Views of donors and recipients regarding disclosure to children following altruistic known oocyte donation.
Yee S; Blyth E; Tsang AK
Reprod Biomed Online; 2011 Dec; 23(7):851-9. PubMed ID: 22019613
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Characterization of potential oocyte donors in Sweden.
Svanberg AS; Lampic C; Bergh T; Lundkvist O
Hum Reprod; 2003 Oct; 18(10):2205-15. PubMed ID: 14507845
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Altruism or obligation? The motivations and experience of women who donate oocytes to known recipients in assisted conception treatment: an interpretative phenomenological analysis study.
Acharya S; Bryant L; Twiddy M
J Psychosom Obstet Gynaecol; 2017 Mar; 38(1):4-11. PubMed ID: 28136000
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. [How is the Czech oocyte donor? The analysis of their profile].
Rumpíková T; Oborná I; Bělašková S; Rumpík D
Ceska Gynekol; 2017; 82(5):372-382. PubMed ID: 29020785
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
