These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

56 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 194455)

  • 41. [Critical study of the Octopus 2000 perimeter].
    Pradines F; Delbosc B; Royer J
    Bull Soc Ophtalmol Fr; 1986 Mar; 86(3):421-5. PubMed ID: 3802358
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. [The use of computerized static perimetry in patients with glaucoma].
    Dudziński A; Gierek-Lapiñska A; Zawojski A
    Klin Oczna; 1987 Sep; 89(9):401-4. PubMed ID: 3328007
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. A note of fixation during perimetry.
    Heijl A; Krakau CE
    Acta Ophthalmol (Copenh); 1977 Oct; 55(5):854-61. PubMed ID: 578643
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. [Experiences with a new attachment for automatic monitoring and evaluation of fixation with the Competer computer perimeter].
    Menapace R; Trauner H
    Klin Monbl Augenheilkd; 1985 Nov; 187(5):348-50. PubMed ID: 4087782
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. The use of state logic in biomedical instrumentation.
    Kehl TH; Moss C; Dunkel L
    Comput Biomed Res; 1974 Jun; 7(3):294-303. PubMed ID: 4842412
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Baseline 24-2 Central Visual Field Damage Is Predictive of Global Progressive Field Loss.
    Garg A; De Moraes CG; Cioffi GA; Girkin CA; Medeiros FA; Weinreb RN; Zangwill LM; Liebmann JM
    Am J Ophthalmol; 2018 Mar; 187():92-98. PubMed ID: 29317211
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Use of Fieldmaster automated perimeter for the detection of early visual field changes in glaucoma.
    Hong C; Kitazawa Y; Shirato S
    Int Ophthalmol; 1982 Feb; 4(3):151-7. PubMed ID: 7068332
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Perimetry, today and tomorrow.
    Enoch JM
    Doc Ophthalmol; 1983 Sep; 55(4):307-22. PubMed ID: 6641478
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Automatic computerized perimetry in the detection of neurological visual field defects. A pilot study.
    Bynke H; Heijl A
    Albrecht Von Graefes Arch Klin Exp Ophthalmol; 1978 Apr; 206(1):11-5. PubMed ID: 306205
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. [Comparative effectiveness of modified selective perimetry in the early detection of visual field changes in glaucoma].
    Sabaeva GF; Nemtseev GI
    Vestn Oftalmol; 1986; 102(3):69-71. PubMed ID: 3727256
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Static vs dynamic visual field evaluation; with emphasis on the utility of the Friedmann Visual Field Analyzer.
    Yellen M; Sherman J
    J Am Optom Assoc; 1979 Jan; 50(1):95-9. PubMed ID: 762380
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. The black hole effect in perimetry.
    Britt JM; Mills RP
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 1988 May; 29(5):795-801. PubMed ID: 3366568
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. A clinical approach to computerized perimetry.
    Jennings BJ
    Optom Clin; 1991; 1(1):229-54. PubMed ID: 1799820
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Studies on computerized perimetry.
    Heijl A
    Acta Ophthalmol Suppl; 1977; 132():1-42. PubMed ID: 194455
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]     [New Search]
    of 3.