These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
4. Sensitivity of voxel-based morphometry analysis to choice of imaging protocol at 3 T. Tardif CL; Collins DL; Pike GB Neuroimage; 2009 Feb; 44(3):827-38. PubMed ID: 18996205 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Effects of study design in multi-scanner voxel-based morphometry studies. Takao H; Hayashi N; Ohtomo K Neuroimage; 2014 Jan; 84():133-40. PubMed ID: 23994315 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Multi-site voxel-based morphometry--not quite there yet. Focke NK; Helms G; Kaspar S; Diederich C; Tóth V; Dechent P; Mohr A; Paulus W Neuroimage; 2011 Jun; 56(3):1164-70. PubMed ID: 21324367 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Automated analysis of multi site MRI phantom data for the NIHPD project. Fu L; Fonov V; Pike B; Evans AC; Collins DL Med Image Comput Comput Assist Interv; 2006; 9(Pt 2):144-51. PubMed ID: 17354766 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Diffeomorphic Anatomical Registration Through Exponentiated Lie Algebra provides reduced effect of scanner for cortex volumetry with atlas-based method in healthy subjects. Goto M; Abe O; Aoki S; Hayashi N; Miyati T; Takao H; Iwatsubo T; Yamashita F; Matsuda H; Mori H; Kunimatsu A; Ino K; Yano K; Ohtomo K; Neuroradiology; 2013 Jul; 55(7):869-75. PubMed ID: 23619702 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. RAPID: a routine assurance pipeline for imaging of diffusion. De Santis S; Evans CJ; Jones DK Magn Reson Med; 2013 Aug; 70(2):490-6. PubMed ID: 22926931 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Quantitative and qualitative assessment of structural magnetic resonance imaging data in a two-center study. Chalavi S; Simmons A; Dijkstra H; Barker GJ; Reinders AA BMC Med Imaging; 2012 Aug; 12():27. PubMed ID: 22867031 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Reproducibility of brain tissue volumes in longitudinal studies: effects of changes in signal-to-noise ratio and scanner software. Shuter B; Yeh IB; Graham S; Au C; Wang SC Neuroimage; 2008 Jun; 41(2):371-9. PubMed ID: 18394925 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Accuracy and reproducibility study of automatic MRI brain tissue segmentation methods. de Boer R; Vrooman HA; Ikram MA; Vernooij MW; Breteler MM; van der Lugt A; Niessen WJ Neuroimage; 2010 Jul; 51(3):1047-56. PubMed ID: 20226258 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. New tissue priors for improved automated classification of subcortical brain structures on MRI. Lorio S; Fresard S; Adaszewski S; Kherif F; Chowdhury R; Frackowiak RS; Ashburner J; Helms G; Weiskopf N; Lutti A; Draganski B Neuroimage; 2016 Apr; 130():157-166. PubMed ID: 26854557 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Multi-centre reproducibility of diffusion MRI parameters for clinical sequences in the brain. Grech-Sollars M; Hales PW; Miyazaki K; Raschke F; Rodriguez D; Wilson M; Gill SK; Banks T; Saunders DE; Clayden JD; Gwilliam MN; Barrick TR; Morgan PS; Davies NP; Rossiter J; Auer DP; Grundy R; Leach MO; Howe FA; Peet AC; Clark CA NMR Biomed; 2015 Apr; 28(4):468-85. PubMed ID: 25802212 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]