114 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19446288)
1. Postoperative evaluation platform of female breast implant surgery with breast configuration indicator.
Sun SP; Hsu KW; Chen JS
Comput Biol Med; 2009 Jul; 39(7):595-603. PubMed ID: 19446288
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The stable status evaluation for female breast implant surgery by calculating related physics parameters.
Sun SP; Hsu KW; Chen JS
Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2008 May; 90(2):95-103. PubMed ID: 18164780
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. 3D analysis of breast augmentation defines operative changes and their relationship to implant dimensions.
Tepper OM; Small KH; Unger JG; Feldman DL; Kumar N; Choi M; Karp NS
Ann Plast Surg; 2009 May; 62(5):570-5. PubMed ID: 19387164
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Anatomically shaped breast prosthesis in vivo: a change of dimension?
Nipshagen MD; Beekman WH; Esmé DL; de Becker J
Aesthetic Plast Surg; 2007; 31(5):540-3. PubMed ID: 17694253
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Optimization of 3-dimensional imaging of the breast region with 3-dimensional laser scanners.
Kovacs L; Yassouridis A; Zimmermann A; Brockmann G; Wöhnl A; Blaschke M; Eder M; Schwenzer-Zimmerer K; Rosenberg R; Papadopulos NA; Biemer E
Ann Plast Surg; 2006 Mar; 56(3):229-36. PubMed ID: 16508349
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. [Evaluation of asymetric implants in breast cancer].
Fitoussi A; Couturaud B; Laki F; Alran S; Salmon RJ
Ann Chir Plast Esthet; 2005 Oct; 50(5):575-81. PubMed ID: 16198040
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. [Development of a computer-aided system for augmentation mammaplasty simulation].
Li XJ; Jun F; Gao JH; Li SH; Cao L
Nan Fang Yi Ke Da Xue Xue Bao; 2007 Oct; 27(10):1489-91. PubMed ID: 17959520
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Three-dimensional visualisation and analysis of post-operative changes in the size and shape of the dental arch and palate.
Trefný P; Tauferová E; Bálková S
Acta Chir Plast; 2005; 47(4):124-8. PubMed ID: 16265949
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A laboratory training and evaluation technique for computer-aided oral implant surgery.
Widmann G; Stoffner R; Keiler M; Zangerl A; Widmann R; Puelacher W; Bale R
Int J Med Robot; 2009 Sep; 5(3):276-83. PubMed ID: 19367613
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparison between implants inserted with and without computer planning and custom model coordination.
Danza M; Zollino I; Carinci F
J Craniofac Surg; 2009 Jul; 20(4):1086-92. PubMed ID: 19521258
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Experimental methodology for digital breast shape analysis and objective surgical outcome evaluation.
Catanuto G; Spano A; Pennati A; Riggio E; Farinella GM; Impoco G; Spoto S; Gallo G; Nava MB
J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg; 2008; 61(3):314-8. PubMed ID: 18267311
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Accuracy of a computerized tomography-guided template-assisted implant placement system: an in vitro study.
Horwitz J; Zuabi O; Machtei EE
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2009 Oct; 20(10):1156-62. PubMed ID: 19519787
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Three-dimensional laser imaging as a valuable tool for specifying changes in breast shape after augmentation mammaplasty.
Esme DL; Bucksch A; Beekman WH
Aesthetic Plast Surg; 2009 Mar; 33(2):191-5. PubMed ID: 18982384
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Three-dimensional educational computer model of the larynx: voicing a new direction.
Hu A; Wilson T; Ladak H; Haase P; Fung K
Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2009 Jul; 135(7):677-81. PubMed ID: 19620589
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A simple way to choose the right implant volume in breast augmentation.
Bracaglia R; Fortunato AR; Gentileschi S
Aesthetic Plast Surg; 2005; 29(5):407-8. PubMed ID: 16158208
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Introducing DeBRa: a detailed breast model for radiological studies.
Ma AK; Gunn S; Darambara DG
Phys Med Biol; 2009 Jul; 54(14):4533-45. PubMed ID: 19556683
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Form-stable silicone gel breast implants.
Jewell M
Clin Plast Surg; 2009 Jan; 36(1):75-89, vi. PubMed ID: 19055963
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Accuracy of upper thoracic pedicle screw placement using three-dimensional image guidance.
Bledsoe JM; Fenton D; Fogelson JL; Nottmeier EW
Spine J; 2009 Oct; 9(10):817-21. PubMed ID: 19664966
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Numerical modelling of biopotential field for detection of breast tumour.
Ng EY; Ng WK; Sim LS; Rajendra Acharya U
Comput Biol Med; 2007 Aug; 37(8):1121-32. PubMed ID: 17145053
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The High Five Process: tissue-based planning for breast augmentation.
Adams WP
Plast Surg Nurs; 2007; 27(4):197-201. PubMed ID: 18165727
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
