These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

314 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19447077)

  • 1. Effect of intervertebral disc height on postoperative motion and clinical outcomes after Prodisc-C cervical disc replacement.
    Peng CW; Quirno M; Bendo JA; Spivak JM; Goldstein JA
    Spine J; 2009 Jul; 9(7):551-5. PubMed ID: 19447077
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The factors that influence the postoperative segmental range of motion after cervical artificial disc replacement.
    Kang KC; Lee CS; Han JH; Chung SS
    Spine J; 2010 Aug; 10(8):689-96. PubMed ID: 20547108
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Effect of intervertebral disc height on postoperative motion and outcomes after ProDisc-L lumbar disc replacement.
    Yaszay B; Bendo JA; Goldstein JA; Quirno M; Spivak JM; Errico TJ
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2008 Mar; 33(5):508-12; discussion 513. PubMed ID: 18317194
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Results of the prospective, randomized, controlled multicenter Food and Drug Administration investigational device exemption study of the ProDisc-C total disc replacement versus anterior discectomy and fusion for the treatment of 1-level symptomatic cervical disc disease.
    Murrey D; Janssen M; Delamarter R; Goldstein J; Zigler J; Tay B; Darden B
    Spine J; 2009 Apr; 9(4):275-86. PubMed ID: 18774751
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. [ProDisc-C mobile replacement of an intervertebral disc. A prospective mono-centric two-year study].
    Stulík J; Kryl J; Sebesta P; Vyskocil T; Krbec M; Trc T
    Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech; 2008 Aug; 75(4):253-61. PubMed ID: 18760080
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Artificial disc versus fusion: a prospective, randomized study with 2-year follow-up on 99 patients.
    Sasso RC; Smucker JD; Hacker RJ; Heller JG
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2007 Dec; 32(26):2933-40; discussion 2941-2. PubMed ID: 18091483
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Interdependence between disc space height, range of motion and clinical outcome in total lumbar disc replacement.
    Siepe CJ; Hitzl W; Meschede P; Sharma AK; Khattab MF; Mayer MH
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2009 Apr; 34(9):904-16. PubMed ID: 19531999
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Effect of intervertebral disc height on the range of motion and clinical outcomes after single-level implantation of Prestige LP cervical disc prosthesis.
    Li H; Lou J; Liu H; Wang B
    Clin Neurol Neurosurg; 2016 Sep; 148():1-4. PubMed ID: 27348742
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Range of motion and adjacent level degeneration after lumbar total disc replacement.
    Huang RC; Tropiano P; Marnay T; Girardi FP; Lim MR; Cammisa FP
    Spine J; 2006; 6(3):242-7. PubMed ID: 16651217
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Sagittal balance influences range of motion: an in vivo study with the ProDisc-C.
    Rabin D; Bertagnoli R; Wharton N; Pickett GE; Duggal N
    Spine J; 2009 Feb; 9(2):128-33. PubMed ID: 18619913
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Clinical outcomes of Bryan cervical disc arthroplasty a prospective, randomized, controlled, single site trial with 48-month follow-up.
    Garrido BJ; Taha TA; Sasso RC
    J Spinal Disord Tech; 2010 Aug; 23(6):367-71. PubMed ID: 20087223
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Prospective, randomized, multicenter Food and Drug Administration investigational device exemption study of lumbar total disc replacement with the CHARITE artificial disc versus lumbar fusion: five-year follow-up.
    Guyer RD; McAfee PC; Banco RJ; Bitan FD; Cappuccino A; Geisler FH; Hochschuler SH; Holt RT; Jenis LG; Majd ME; Regan JJ; Tromanhauser SG; Wong DC; Blumenthal SL
    Spine J; 2009 May; 9(5):374-86. PubMed ID: 18805066
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [The mid- or long-term clinical results of prosthetic disc nucleus replacement in the treatment of lumbar disc disease].
    Ma YZ; Xue HB; Chen X; Guo LX; Li HW; Liu HR
    Zhonghua Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2008 Mar; 46(5):350-3. PubMed ID: 18785530
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Effect of two-level total disc replacement on cervical spine kinematics.
    Phillips FM; Tzermiadianos MN; Voronov LI; Havey RM; Carandang G; Dooris A; Patwardhan AG
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2009 Oct; 34(22):E794-9. PubMed ID: 19829242
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Stress analysis of the interface between cervical vertebrae end plates and the Bryan, Prestige LP, and ProDisc-C cervical disc prostheses: an in vivo image-based finite element study.
    Lin CY; Kang H; Rouleau JP; Hollister SJ; Marca FL
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2009 Jul; 34(15):1554-60. PubMed ID: 19564765
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Lumbar total disc arthroplasty utilizing the ProDisc prosthesis in smokers versus nonsmokers: a prospective study with 2-year minimum follow-up.
    Bertagnoli R; Yue JJ; Kershaw T; Shah RV; Pfeiffer F; Fenk-Mayer A; Nanieva R; Karg A; Husted DS; Emerson JW
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2006 Apr; 31(9):992-7. PubMed ID: 16641775
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Prospective, randomized trial of metal-on-metal artificial lumbar disc replacement: initial results for treatment of discogenic pain.
    Sasso RC; Foulk DM; Hahn M
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2008 Jan; 33(2):123-31. PubMed ID: 18197095
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Motion analysis of bryan cervical disc arthroplasty versus anterior discectomy and fusion: results from a prospective, randomized, multicenter, clinical trial.
    Sasso RC; Best NM; Metcalf NH; Anderson PA
    J Spinal Disord Tech; 2008 Aug; 21(6):393-9. PubMed ID: 18679092
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Index level mobility after total lumbar disc replacement: is it beneficial or detrimental?
    Cakir B; Schmidt R; Mattes T; Fraitzl CR; Reichel H; Käfer W
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2009 Apr; 34(9):917-23. PubMed ID: 19532000
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Disc arthroplasty design influences intervertebral kinematics and facet forces.
    Rousseau MA; Bradford DS; Bertagnoli R; Hu SS; Lotz JC
    Spine J; 2006; 6(3):258-66. PubMed ID: 16651219
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 16.