140 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19447763)
1. Effects of high-rate pulse trains on electrode discrimination in cochlear implant users.
Runge-Samuelson CL
Trends Amplif; 2009 Jun; 13(2):76-86. PubMed ID: 19447763
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Development of electrophysiological and behavioural measures of electrode discrimination in adult cochlear implant users.
Mathew R; Vickers D; Boyle P; Shaida A; Selvadurai D; Jiang D; Undurraga J
Hear Res; 2018 Sep; 367():74-87. PubMed ID: 30031354
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Interaural envelope correlation change discrimination in bilateral cochlear implantees: effects of mismatch, centering, and onset of deafness.
Goupell MJ
J Acoust Soc Am; 2015 Mar; 137(3):1282-97. PubMed ID: 25786942
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Objective assessment of electrode discrimination with the auditory change complex in adult cochlear implant users.
Mathew R; Undurraga J; Li G; Meerton L; Boyle P; Shaida A; Selvadurai D; Jiang D; Vickers D
Hear Res; 2017 Oct; 354():86-101. PubMed ID: 28826636
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Variations in carrier pulse rate and the perception of amplitude modulation in cochlear implant users.
Green T; Faulkner A; Rosen S
Ear Hear; 2012; 33(2):221-30. PubMed ID: 22367093
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Training improves cochlear implant rate discrimination on a psychophysical task.
Goldsworthy RL; Shannon RV
J Acoust Soc Am; 2014 Jan; 135(1):334-41. PubMed ID: 24437773
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. A fast method for measuring psychophysical thresholds across the cochlear implant array.
Bierer JA; Bierer SM; Kreft HA; Oxenham AJ
Trends Hear; 2015 Feb; 19():. PubMed ID: 25656797
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Psychoacoustic and electrophysiological electric-acoustic interaction effects in cochlear implant users with ipsilateral residual hearing.
Imsiecke M; Büchner A; Lenarz T; Nogueira W
Hear Res; 2020 Feb; 386():107873. PubMed ID: 31884220
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Fitting prelingually deafened adult cochlear implant users based on electrode discrimination performance.
Debruyne JA; Francart T; Janssen AM; Douma K; Brokx JP
Int J Audiol; 2017 Mar; 56(3):174-185. PubMed ID: 27758152
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Detection of acoustic temporal fine structure by cochlear implant listeners: behavioral results and computational modeling.
Imennov NS; Won JH; Drennan WR; Jameyson E; Rubinstein JT
Hear Res; 2013 Apr; 298():60-72. PubMed ID: 23333260
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Evaluating multipulse integration as a neural-health correlate in human cochlear-implant users: Relationship to forward-masking recovery.
Zhou N; Pfingst BE
J Acoust Soc Am; 2016 Mar; 139(3):EL70-5. PubMed ID: 27036290
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Contralateral suppression of human hearing sensitivity in single-sided deaf cochlear implant users.
Nogueira W; Krüger B; Büchner A; Lopez-Poveda E
Hear Res; 2019 Mar; 373():121-129. PubMed ID: 29941311
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Relationship Between Peripheral and Psychophysical Measures of Amplitude Modulation Detection in Cochlear Implant Users.
Tejani VD; Abbas PJ; Brown CJ
Ear Hear; 2017; 38(5):e268-e284. PubMed ID: 28207576
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Electric-acoustic forward masking in cochlear implant users with ipsilateral residual hearing.
Imsiecke M; Krüger B; Büchner A; Lenarz T; Nogueira W
Hear Res; 2018 Jul; 364():25-37. PubMed ID: 29673567
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Auditory steady-state responses in cochlear implant users: Effect of modulation frequency and stimulation artifacts.
Gransier R; Deprez H; Hofmann M; Moonen M; van Wieringen A; Wouters J
Hear Res; 2016 May; 335():149-160. PubMed ID: 26994660
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Auditory detection and discrimination in deaf cats: psychophysical and neural thresholds for intracochlear electrical signals.
Vollmer M; Beitel RE; Snyder RL
J Neurophysiol; 2001 Nov; 86(5):2330-43. PubMed ID: 11698523
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Simultaneous masking between electric and acoustic stimulation in cochlear implant users with residual low-frequency hearing.
Krüger B; Büchner A; Nogueira W
Hear Res; 2017 Sep; 353():185-196. PubMed ID: 28688755
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. A neural-based vocoder implementation for evaluating cochlear implant coding strategies.
El Boghdady N; Kegel A; Lai WK; Dillier N
Hear Res; 2016 Mar; 333():136-149. PubMed ID: 26775182
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Assessing auditory nerve condition by tone decay in deaf subjects with a cochlear implant.
Wasmann JA; van Eijl RHM; Versnel H; van Zanten GA
Int J Audiol; 2018 Nov; 57(11):864-871. PubMed ID: 30261773
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Sensitivity to pulse phase duration in cochlear implant listeners: effects of stimulation mode.
Chatterjee M; Kulkarni AM
J Acoust Soc Am; 2014 Aug; 136(2):829-40. PubMed ID: 25096116
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
