These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
271 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19448025)
1. Bivariate analysis of conception rates and test-day milk yields in Holsteins using a threshold-linear model with random regressions. Tsuruta S; Misztal I; Huang C; Lawlor TJ J Dairy Sci; 2009 Jun; 92(6):2922-30. PubMed ID: 19448025 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Use of test-day records beyond three hundred five days for estimation of three hundred five-day breeding values for production traits and somatic cell score of Canadian Holsteins. Bohmanova J; Miglior F; Jamrozik J J Dairy Sci; 2009 Oct; 92(10):5314-25. PubMed ID: 19762849 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Variance components for test-day milk, fat, and protein yield, and somatic cell score for analyzing management information. Caccamo M; Veerkamp RF; de Jong G; Pool MH; Petriglieri R; Licitra G J Dairy Sci; 2008 Aug; 91(8):3268-76. PubMed ID: 18650304 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparison of random regression models with Legendre polynomials and linear splines for production traits and somatic cell score of Canadian Holstein cows. Bohmanova J; Miglior F; Jamrozik J; Misztal I; Sullivan PG J Dairy Sci; 2008 Sep; 91(9):3627-38. PubMed ID: 18765621 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Genetic parameters for tunisian holsteins using a test-day random regression model. Hammami H; Rekik B; Soyeurt H; Ben Gara A; Gengler N J Dairy Sci; 2008 May; 91(5):2118-26. PubMed ID: 18420643 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Trends for conception rate of Holsteins over time in the southeastern United States. Huang C; Tsuruta S; Bertrand JK; Misztal I; Lawlor TJ; Clay JS J Dairy Sci; 2009 Sep; 92(9):4641-7. PubMed ID: 19700727 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Relationships between conception rate in Holstein heifers and cows and milk yield at various stages of lactation. Hagiya K; Terawaki Y; Yamazaki T; Nagamine Y; Itoh F; Yamaguchi S; Abe H; Gotoh Y; Kawahara T; Masuda Y; Suzuki M Animal; 2013 Sep; 7(9):1423-8. PubMed ID: 23597286 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Environmental effects on conception rates of Holsteins in New York and Georgia. Huang C; Tsuruta S; Bertrand JK; Misztal I; Lawlor TJ; Clay JS J Dairy Sci; 2008 Feb; 91(2):818-25. PubMed ID: 18218770 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Relationships between milk yield and somatic cell score in Canadian Holsteins from simultaneous and recursive random regression models. Jamrozik J; Bohmanova J; Schaeffer LR J Dairy Sci; 2010 Mar; 93(3):1216-33. PubMed ID: 20172242 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Genetic parameters for a multiple-trait multiple-lactation random regression test-day model in Italian Holsteins. Muir BL; Kistemaker G; Jamrozik J; Canavesi F J Dairy Sci; 2007 Mar; 90(3):1564-74. PubMed ID: 17297130 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Within-herd heritability estimated with daughter-parent regression for yield and somatic cell score. Dechow CD; Norman HD J Dairy Sci; 2007 Jan; 90(1):482-92. PubMed ID: 17183117 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Genetic analysis of fertility in the Italian Brown Swiss population using different models and trait definitions. Tiezzi F; Maltecca C; Penasa M; Cecchinato A; Chang YM; Bittante G J Dairy Sci; 2011 Dec; 94(12):6162-72. PubMed ID: 22118104 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Genetic parameters of milking frequency and milk production traits in Canadian Holsteins milked by an automated milking system. Nixon M; Bohmanova J; Jamrozik J; Schaeffer LR; Hand K; Miglior F J Dairy Sci; 2009 Jul; 92(7):3422-30. PubMed ID: 19528620 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Modeling nuisance variables for prediction of service sire fertility. Kuhn MT; Hutchison JL; Norman HD J Dairy Sci; 2008 Jul; 91(7):2823-35. PubMed ID: 18565940 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Genetic analysis of male and female fertility using longitudinal binary data. Averill TA; Rekaya R; Weigel K J Dairy Sci; 2004 Nov; 87(11):3947-52. PubMed ID: 15483179 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Random regression models for male and female fertility evaluation using longitudinal binary data. Averill T; Rekaya R; Weigel K J Dairy Sci; 2006 Sep; 89(9):3681-9. PubMed ID: 16899704 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Genetic parameter estimation for milk yield over multiple parities and various lengths of lactation in Danish Jerseys by random regression models. Guo Z; Lund MS; Madsen P; Korsgaard I; Jensen J J Dairy Sci; 2002 Jun; 85(6):1596-606. PubMed ID: 12146493 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Environmental sensitivity for milk yield in Luxembourg and Tunisian Holsteins by herd management level. Hammami H; Rekik B; Bastin C; Soyeurt H; Bormann J; Stoll J; Gengler N J Dairy Sci; 2009 Sep; 92(9):4604-12. PubMed ID: 19700723 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Random herd curves in a test-day model for milk, fat, and protein production of dairy cattle in The Netherlands. de Roos AP; Harbers AG; de Jong G J Dairy Sci; 2004 Aug; 87(8):2693-701. PubMed ID: 15328295 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Mortality, culling by sixty days in milk, and production profiles in high- and low-survival Pennsylvania herds. Dechow CD; Goodling RC J Dairy Sci; 2008 Dec; 91(12):4630-9. PubMed ID: 19038939 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]