These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

271 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19448025)

  • 41. Relationship between somatic cell count and milk yield in different stages of lactation.
    Hagnestam-Nielsen C; Emanuelson U; Berglund B; Strandberg E
    J Dairy Sci; 2009 Jul; 92(7):3124-33. PubMed ID: 19528590
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Genotype by environment interaction for fertility, survival, and milk production traits in Australian dairy cattle.
    Haile-Mariam M; Carrick MJ; Goddard ME
    J Dairy Sci; 2008 Dec; 91(12):4840-53. PubMed ID: 19038960
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Phenotypic analysis of pregnancy effect on milk, fat, and protein yields of Canadian Ayrshire, Jersey, Brown Swiss, and Guernsey breeds.
    Loker S; Miglior F; Bohmanova J; Jamrozik J; Schaeffer LR
    J Dairy Sci; 2009 Mar; 92(3):1300-12. PubMed ID: 19233823
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Genetic and phenotypic relationships among milk urea nitrogen, fertility, and milk yield in holstein cows.
    König S; Chang YM; von Borstel UU; Gianola D; Simianer H
    J Dairy Sci; 2008 Nov; 91(11):4372-82. PubMed ID: 18946143
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Joint international evaluation of Milking Shorthorn dairy cattle for production traits.
    Barrett R; Miglior F; Jansen G; Jamrozik J; Schaeffer LR
    J Dairy Sci; 2005 Sep; 88(9):3326-36. PubMed ID: 16107423
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Body condition scores and dairy form evaluations as indicators of days open in US Holsteins.
    Dechow CD; Rogers GW; Klei L; Lawlor TJ; VanRaden PM
    J Dairy Sci; 2004 Oct; 87(10):3534-41. PubMed ID: 15377633
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. A method to analyze production responses in dairy herds.
    Ferguson JD; Beede DK; Shaver RD; Polan CE; Huber JT; Chandler PT
    J Dairy Sci; 2000 Jul; 83(7):1530-42. PubMed ID: 10908061
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Genetic analysis of body condition score in first-parity Danish Holstein cows.
    Lassen J; Hansen M; Sørensen MK; Aamand GP; Christensen LG; Madsen P
    J Dairy Sci; 2003 Dec; 86(12):4123-8. PubMed ID: 14740853
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Associations of breed and feeding management with milk production curves at herd level using a random regression test-day model.
    Caccamo M; Veerkamp RF; Ferguson JD; Petriglieri R; La Terra F; Licitra G
    J Dairy Sci; 2010 Oct; 93(10):4986-95. PubMed ID: 20855033
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Effects of production, season, age of cow, days dry, and days in milk on conception to first service in large commercial dairy herds.
    Hillers JK; Senger PL; Darlington RL; Fleming WN
    J Dairy Sci; 1984 Apr; 67(4):861-7. PubMed ID: 6539346
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Bayesian estimates of covariance components between lactation curve parameters and disease liability in Danish Holstein cows.
    Jakobsen JH; Rekaya R; Jensen J; Sorensen DA; Madsen P; Gianola D; Christensen LG; Pedersen J
    J Dairy Sci; 2003 Sep; 86(9):3000-7. PubMed ID: 14507037
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Voluntary waiting period and adoption of synchronized breeding in dairy herd improvement herds.
    Miller RH; Norman HD; Kuhn MT; Clay JS; Hutchison JL
    J Dairy Sci; 2007 Mar; 90(3):1594-606. PubMed ID: 17297133
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Genetic analyses of protein yield in dairy cows applying random regression models with time-dependent and temperature x humidity-dependent covariates.
    Brügemann K; Gernand E; von Borstel UU; König S
    J Dairy Sci; 2011 Aug; 94(8):4129-39. PubMed ID: 21787948
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Effect of heat stress on nonreturn rate in Holstein cows: genetic analyses.
    Ravagnolo O; Misztal I
    J Dairy Sci; 2002 Nov; 85(11):3092-100. PubMed ID: 12487476
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Genotype x environment interaction for grazing versus confinement. I. Production traits.
    Kearney JF; Schutz MM; Boettcher PJ; Weigel KA
    J Dairy Sci; 2004 Feb; 87(2):501-9. PubMed ID: 14762093
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Comparison of random regression test-day models for Polish Black and White cattle.
    Strabel T; Szyda J; Ptak E; Jamrozik J
    J Dairy Sci; 2005 Oct; 88(10):3688-99. PubMed ID: 16162544
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Bivariate analysis of number of services to conception and days open in Norwegian red using a censored threshold-linear model.
    Chang YM; Andersen-Ranberg IM; Heringstad B; Gianola D; Klemetsdal G
    J Dairy Sci; 2006 Feb; 89(2):772-8. PubMed ID: 16428644
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Statistical evaluation of factors and interactions affecting dairy herd improvement milk urea nitrogen in commercial midwest dairy herds.
    Wattiaux MA; Nordheim EV; Crump P
    J Dairy Sci; 2005 Aug; 88(8):3020-35. PubMed ID: 16027216
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Trends in reproductive performance in Southeastern Holstein and Jersey DHI herds.
    Washburn SP; Silvia WJ; Brown CH; McDaniel BT; McAllister AJ
    J Dairy Sci; 2002 Jan; 85(1):244-51. PubMed ID: 11860117
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Prediction of daily milk, fat, and protein production by a random regression test-day model.
    Mayeres P; Stoll J; Bormann J; Reents R; Gengler N
    J Dairy Sci; 2004 Jun; 87(6):1925-33. PubMed ID: 15453510
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 14.