BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

1277 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19448222)

  • 1. Improvement in the quality of randomized controlled trials among general anesthesiology journals 2000 to 2006: a 6-year follow-up.
    Greenfield ML; Mhyre JM; Mashour GA; Blum JM; Yen EC; Rosenberg AL
    Anesth Analg; 2009 Jun; 108(6):1916-21. PubMed ID: 19448222
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Does a "Level I Evidence" rating imply high quality of reporting in orthopaedic randomised controlled trials?
    Poolman RW; Struijs PA; Krips R; Sierevelt IN; Lutz KH; Bhandari M
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2006 Sep; 6():44. PubMed ID: 16965628
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Quality and retrieval of obstetrical anaesthesia randomized controlled trials.
    Bender JS; Halpern SH; Thangaroopan M; Jadad AR; Ohlsson A
    Can J Anaesth; 1997 Jan; 44(1):14-8. PubMed ID: 8988818
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The quality of reporting of trial abstracts is suboptimal: survey of major general medical journals.
    Berwanger O; Ribeiro RA; Finkelsztejn A; Watanabe M; Suzumura EA; Duncan BB; Devereaux PJ; Cook D
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2009 Apr; 62(4):387-92. PubMed ID: 19010643
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The quality of randomized controlled trials in major anesthesiology journals.
    Greenfield MLVH; Rosenberg AL; O'Reilly M; Shanks AM; Sliwinski MJ; Nauss MD
    Anesth Analg; 2005 Jun; 100(6):1759-1764. PubMed ID: 15920210
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The quality of reporting and outcome measures in randomized clinical trials related to upper-extremity disorders.
    Gummesson C; Atroshi I; Ekdahl C
    J Hand Surg Am; 2004 Jul; 29(4):727-34; discussion 735-7. PubMed ID: 15249101
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Control of bias in randomized controlled trials published in prosthodontic journals.
    Dumbrigue HB; Jones JS; Esquivel JF
    J Prosthet Dent; 2001 Dec; 86(6):592-6. PubMed ID: 11753309
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Assessing quality of reports on randomized clinical trials in nursing journals.
    Parent N; Hanley JA
    Can J Cardiovasc Nurs; 2009; 19(2):25-39. PubMed ID: 19517902
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A critical assessment of the quality of reporting of randomized, controlled trials in the urology literature.
    Scales CD; Norris RD; Keitz SA; Peterson BL; Preminger GM; Vieweg J; Dahm P
    J Urol; 2007 Mar; 177(3):1090-4; discussion 1094-5. PubMed ID: 17296417
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Quality of reporting of key methodological items of randomized controlled trials in clinical ophthalmic journals.
    Lai TY; Wong VW; Lam RF; Cheng AC; Lam DS; Leung GM
    Ophthalmic Epidemiol; 2007; 14(6):390-8. PubMed ID: 18161613
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Quality of reporting randomized controlled trials (RCTs) in the nursing literature: application of the consolidated standards of reporting trials (CONSORT).
    Smith BA; Lee HJ; Lee JH; Choi M; Jones DE; Bausell RB; Broome ME
    Nurs Outlook; 2008; 56(1):31-37. PubMed ID: 18237622
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Quality of reporting in randomized trials published in high-quality surgical journals.
    Sinha S; Sinha S; Ashby E; Jayaram R; Grocott MP
    J Am Coll Surg; 2009 Nov; 209(5):565-571.e1. PubMed ID: 19854395
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Assessment of bias in methodology for randomized controlled trials published on implant dentistry.
    Dumbrigue HB; Al-Bayat MI; Ng CC; Wakefield CW
    J Prosthodont; 2006; 15(4):257-63. PubMed ID: 16827739
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Quality of interventional radiology literature: a review of articles published in JVIR and CVIR.
    Meyer J; Nsouli-Maktabi H; Spies JB
    J Vasc Interv Radiol; 2009 Oct; 20(10):1271-6. PubMed ID: 19631559
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Determining the reporting quality of RCTs in clinical pharmacology.
    Mills E; Loke YK; Wu P; Montori VM; Perri D; Moher D; Guyatt G
    Br J Clin Pharmacol; 2004 Jul; 58(1):61-5. PubMed ID: 15206994
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Methodology standards associated with quality reporting in clinical studies in pediatric surgery journals.
    Thakur A; Wang EC; Chiu TT; Chen W; Ko CY; Chang JT; Atkinson JB; Fonkalsrud EW; Grosfeld JL
    J Pediatr Surg; 2001 Aug; 36(8):1160-4. PubMed ID: 11479847
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A quality assessment of randomized clinical trials in pediatric orthopaedics.
    Dulai SK; Slobogean BL; Beauchamp RD; Mulpuri K
    J Pediatr Orthop; 2007; 27(5):573-81. PubMed ID: 17585270
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Chinese authors do need CONSORT: reporting quality assessment for five leading Chinese medical journals.
    Xu L; Li J; Zhang M; Ai C; Wang L
    Contemp Clin Trials; 2008 Sep; 29(5):727-31. PubMed ID: 18579449
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Publication bias in the anesthesiology literature.
    De Oliveira GS; Chang R; Kendall MC; Fitzgerald PC; McCarthy RJ
    Anesth Analg; 2012 May; 114(5):1042-8. PubMed ID: 22344237
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Evaluating the evidence: the methodological and reporting quality of comparative observational studies of surgical interventions in urological publications.
    Tseng TY; Breau RH; Fesperman SF; Vieweg J; Dahm P
    BJU Int; 2009 Apr; 103(8):1026-31. PubMed ID: 19021602
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 64.