315 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19449435)
1. Quantification of cerebral blood flow, cerebral blood volume, and blood-brain-barrier leakage with DCE-MRI.
Sourbron S; Ingrisch M; Siefert A; Reiser M; Herrmann K
Magn Reson Med; 2009 Jul; 62(1):205-17. PubMed ID: 19449435
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Quantification of perfusion and permeability in multiple sclerosis: dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI in 3D at 3T.
Ingrisch M; Sourbron S; Morhard D; Ertl-Wagner B; Kümpfel T; Hohlfeld R; Reiser M; Glaser C
Invest Radiol; 2012 Apr; 47(4):252-8. PubMed ID: 22373532
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Blood-brain barrier permeability measured using dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging: a validation study.
Varatharaj A; Liljeroth M; Darekar A; Larsson HBW; Galea I; Cramer SP
J Physiol; 2019 Feb; 597(3):699-709. PubMed ID: 30417928
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Measurement of brain perfusion, blood volume, and blood-brain barrier permeability, using dynamic contrast-enhanced T(1)-weighted MRI at 3 tesla.
Larsson HB; Courivaud F; Rostrup E; Hansen AE
Magn Reson Med; 2009 Nov; 62(5):1270-81. PubMed ID: 19780145
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Absolute quantification of perfusion by dynamic susceptibility contrast MRI using Bookend and VASO steady-state CBV calibration: a comparison with pseudo-continuous ASL.
Lindgren E; Wirestam R; Markenroth Bloch K; Ahlgren A; van Osch MJ; van Westen D; Surova Y; Ståhlberg F; Knutsson L
MAGMA; 2014 Dec; 27(6):487-99. PubMed ID: 24570336
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Assessment of the Agreement between Cerebral Hemodynamic Indices Quantified Using Dynamic Susceptibility Contrast and Dynamic Contrast-enhanced Perfusion Magnetic Resonance Imagings.
Zakariaee SS; Oghabian MA; Firouznia K; Sharifi G; Arbabi F; Samiei F
J Clin Imaging Sci; 2018; 8():2. PubMed ID: 29441225
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Partial-volume model for determining white matter and gray matter cerebral blood volume for analysis of gliomas.
Lee MC; Cha S; Chang SM; Nelson SJ
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2006 Mar; 23(3):257-66. PubMed ID: 16456821
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Dynamic susceptibility contrast MRI with a prebolus contrast agent administration design for improved absolute quantification of perfusion.
Knutsson L; Lindgren E; Ahlgren A; van Osch MJ; Bloch KM; Surova Y; Ståhlberg F; van Westen D; Wirestam R
Magn Reson Med; 2014 Oct; 72(4):996-1006. PubMed ID: 24285621
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Measuring subtle leakage of the blood-brain barrier in cerebrovascular disease with DCE-MRI: Test-retest reproducibility and its influencing factors.
Wong SM; Jansen JFA; Zhang CE; Staals J; Hofman PAM; van Oostenbrugge RJ; Jeukens CRLPN; Backes WH
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2017 Jul; 46(1):159-166. PubMed ID: 28160347
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Absolute quantification of cerebral blood flow: correlation between dynamic susceptibility contrast MRI and model-free arterial spin labeling.
Knutsson L; van Westen D; Petersen ET; Markenroth Bloch K; Holtås S; Ståhlberg F; Wirestam R
Magn Reson Imaging; 2010 Jan; 28(1):1-7. PubMed ID: 19695822
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Comparison between intensity normalization techniques for dynamic susceptibility contrast (DSC)-MRI estimates of cerebral blood volume (CBV) in human gliomas.
Ellingson BM; Zaw T; Cloughesy TF; Naeini KM; Lalezari S; Mong S; Lai A; Nghiemphu PL; Pope WB
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2012 Jun; 35(6):1472-7. PubMed ID: 22281731
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Classic models for dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI.
Sourbron SP; Buckley DL
NMR Biomed; 2013 Aug; 26(8):1004-27. PubMed ID: 23674304
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Time-efficient measurement of multi-phase arterial spin labeling MR signal in white matter.
Zhang X; Ronen I; Kan HE; Teeuwisse WM; van Osch MJ
NMR Biomed; 2016 Nov; 29(11):1519-1525. PubMed ID: 27594277
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparison between echo contrast agent-specific imaging modes and perfusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging for the assessment of brain perfusion.
Meves SH; Wilkening W; Thies T; Eyding J; Hölscher T; Finger M; Schmid G; Ermert H; Postert T;
Stroke; 2002 Oct; 33(10):2433-7. PubMed ID: 12364734
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Measurement of cerebral perfusion with dual-echo multi-slice quantitative dynamic susceptibility contrast MRI.
Vonken EJ; van Osch MJ; Bakker CJ; Viergever MA
J Magn Reson Imaging; 1999 Aug; 10(2):109-17. PubMed ID: 10441012
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Effect of regional tracer delay on CBF in healthy subjects measured with dynamic susceptibility contrast-enhanced MRI: comparison with 15O-PET.
Ibaraki M; Shimosegawa E; Toyoshima H; Ishigame K; Ito H; Takahashi K; Miura S; Kanno I
Magn Reson Med Sci; 2005; 4(1):27-34. PubMed ID: 16127251
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Attempts to improve absolute quantification of cerebral blood flow in dynamic susceptibility contrast magnetic resonance imaging: a simplified T1-weighted steady-state cerebral blood volume approach.
Wirestam R; Knutsson L; Risberg J; Börjesson S; Larsson EM; Gustafson L; Passant U; Ståhlberg F
Acta Radiol; 2007 Jun; 48(5):550-6. PubMed ID: 17520432
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Regional and voxel-wise comparisons of blood flow measurements between dynamic susceptibility contrast magnetic resonance imaging (DSC-MRI) and arterial spin labeling (ASL) in brain tumors.
White CM; Pope WB; Zaw T; Qiao J; Naeini KM; Lai A; Nghiemphu PL; Wang JJ; Cloughesy TF; Ellingson BM
J Neuroimaging; 2014; 24(1):23-30. PubMed ID: 22672084
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Perfusion MR imaging of enhancing brain tumors: Comparison of arterial spin labeling technique with dynamic susceptibility contrast technique.
Soni N; Dhanota DPS; Kumar S; Jaiswal AK; Srivastava AK
Neurol India; 2017; 65(5):1046-1052. PubMed ID: 28879895
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Feasibility study of exploring a T₁-weighted dynamic contrast-enhanced MR approach for brain perfusion imaging.
Zhang Y; Wang J; Wang X; Zhang J; Fang J; Jiang X
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2012 Jun; 35(6):1322-31. PubMed ID: 22314848
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
