299 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19449969)
1. Three-dimensional geometrical characterization of abdominal aortic aneurysms: image-based wall thickness distribution.
Martufi G; Di Martino ES; Amon CH; Muluk SC; Finol EA
J Biomech Eng; 2009 Jun; 131(6):061015. PubMed ID: 19449969
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Towards a noninvasive method for determination of patient-specific wall strength distribution in abdominal aortic aneurysms.
Vande Geest JP; Wang DH; Wisniewski SR; Makaroun MS; Vorp DA
Ann Biomed Eng; 2006 Jul; 34(7):1098-106. PubMed ID: 16786395
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Mechanical stresses in abdominal aortic aneurysms: influence of diameter, asymmetry, and material anisotropy.
RodrÃguez JF; Ruiz C; Doblaré M; Holzapfel GA
J Biomech Eng; 2008 Apr; 130(2):021023. PubMed ID: 18412510
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. A biomechanics-based rupture potential index for abdominal aortic aneurysm risk assessment: demonstrative application.
Vande Geest JP; Di Martino ES; Bohra A; Makaroun MS; Vorp DA
Ann N Y Acad Sci; 2006 Nov; 1085():11-21. PubMed ID: 17182918
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Abdominal aortic aneurysm risk of rupture: patient-specific FSI simulations using anisotropic model.
Rissland P; Alemu Y; Einav S; Ricotta J; Bluestein D
J Biomech Eng; 2009 Mar; 131(3):031001. PubMed ID: 19154060
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Effects of wall calcifications in patient-specific wall stress analyses of abdominal aortic aneurysms.
Speelman L; Bohra A; Bosboom EM; Schurink GW; van de Vosse FN; Makaorun MS; Vorp DA
J Biomech Eng; 2007 Feb; 129(1):105-9. PubMed ID: 17227104
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Importance of initial stress for abdominal aortic aneurysm wall motion: dynamic MRI validated finite element analysis.
Merkx MA; van 't Veer M; Speelman L; Breeuwer M; Buth J; van de Vosse FN
J Biomech; 2009 Oct; 42(14):2369-73. PubMed ID: 19665127
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The Association Between Geometry and Wall Stress in Emergently Repaired Abdominal Aortic Aneurysms.
Chauhan SS; Gutierrez CA; Thirugnanasambandam M; De Oliveira V; Muluk SC; Eskandari MK; Finol EA
Ann Biomed Eng; 2017 Aug; 45(8):1908-1916. PubMed ID: 28444478
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Fluid-structure interaction in abdominal aortic aneurysms: effects of asymmetry and wall thickness.
Scotti CM; Shkolnik AD; Muluk SC; Finol EA
Biomed Eng Online; 2005 Nov; 4():64. PubMed ID: 16271141
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A patient-specific computational model of fluid-structure interaction in abdominal aortic aneurysms.
Wolters BJ; Rutten MC; Schurink GW; Kose U; de Hart J; van de Vosse FN
Med Eng Phys; 2005 Dec; 27(10):871-83. PubMed ID: 16157501
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The long-term relationship of wall stress to the natural history of abdominal aortic aneurysms (finite element analysis and other methods).
Fillinger M
Ann N Y Acad Sci; 2006 Nov; 1085():22-8. PubMed ID: 17182919
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. 3D reconstruction and manufacture of real abdominal aortic aneurysms: from CT scan to silicone model.
Doyle BJ; Morris LG; Callanan A; Kelly P; Vorp DA; McGloughlin TM
J Biomech Eng; 2008 Jun; 130(3):034501. PubMed ID: 18532870
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. A decoupled fluid structure approach for estimating wall stress in abdominal aortic aneurysms.
Papaharilaou Y; Ekaterinaris JA; Manousaki E; Katsamouris AN
J Biomech; 2007; 40(2):367-77. PubMed ID: 16500664
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Use of the photoelastic method and finite element analysis in the assessment of wall strain in abdominal aortic aneurysm models.
Doyle BJ; Killion J; Callanan A
J Biomech; 2012 Jun; 45(10):1759-68. PubMed ID: 22633540
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Blood flow and structure interactions in a stented abdominal aortic aneurysm model.
Li Z; Kleinstreuer C
Med Eng Phys; 2005 Jun; 27(5):369-82. PubMed ID: 15863346
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Regional distribution of wall thickness and failure properties of human abdominal aortic aneurysm.
Raghavan ML; Kratzberg J; Castro de Tolosa EM; Hanaoka MM; Walker P; da Silva ES
J Biomech; 2006; 39(16):3010-6. PubMed ID: 16337949
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Simple geometric characteristics fail to reliably predict abdominal aortic aneurysm wall stresses.
Hua J; Mower WR
J Vasc Surg; 2001 Aug; 34(2):308-15. PubMed ID: 11496284
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. CFD and PTV steady flow investigation in an anatomically accurate abdominal aortic aneurysm.
Boutsianis E; Guala M; Olgac U; Wildermuth S; Hoyer K; Ventikos Y; Poulikakos D
J Biomech Eng; 2009 Jan; 131(1):011008. PubMed ID: 19045924
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Quantitative assessment of abdominal aortic aneurysm geometry.
Shum J; Martufi G; Di Martino E; Washington CB; Grisafi J; Muluk SC; Finol EA
Ann Biomed Eng; 2011 Jan; 39(1):277-86. PubMed ID: 20890661
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Effects of blood flow and vessel geometry on wall stress and rupture risk of abdominal aortic aneurysms.
Li Z; Kleinstreuer C
J Med Eng Technol; 2006; 30(5):283-97. PubMed ID: 16980283
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
