459 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19450505)
1. Will scientists cast their votes?
Maxmen A
Cell; 2009 May; 137(4):595-7. PubMed ID: 19450505
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Federal science policy. Changing battle lines, new fronts.
Silberner J
Hastings Cent Rep; 1999; 29(4):6. PubMed ID: 10451832
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. New president, new congress..... new hope for science?
Wolinetz CD
Physiologist; 2009 Feb; 52(1):1, 3-5. PubMed ID: 19271423
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Science and security. U.S. agencies to start screening biomedical proposals for dual use.
Malakoff D
Science; 2012 Apr; 336(6077):21. PubMed ID: 22491834
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Medical research scores big in US stimulus bill.
Hand E; Wadman M
Nature; 2009 Feb; 457(7232):942. PubMed ID: 19238683
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Stem cells-why wait?
Nat Med; 2000 Mar; 6(3):231. PubMed ID: 10700194
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Responding to stimuli.
Mahapatra A
ACS Chem Biol; 2009 Apr; 4(4):233. PubMed ID: 19371128
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Stem cell research in California: the game is on.
Trounson A; Klein R; Murphy R
Cell; 2008 Feb; 132(4):522-4. PubMed ID: 18295567
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. U.S. science policy. NIH stimulus plan triggers flood of applications--and anxiety.
Kaiser J
Science; 2009 Apr; 324(5925):318-9. PubMed ID: 19372395
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Biomedical policy. U.S. House reveals ambitious biomedical innovation plan.
Servick K
Science; 2015 Feb; 347(6222):594-5. PubMed ID: 25657222
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Agency under siege.
Nature; 2005 Jul; 436(7049):304. PubMed ID: 16034377
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. The obligation for biologists to commit to political advocacy.
Pollard TD
Cell; 2012 Oct; 151(2):239-43. PubMed ID: 23063115
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. US congressman attacks NIH investigation.
Anderson A; Palca J
Nature; 1988 Nov; 336(6197):295. PubMed ID: 3194012
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. A delicate balance.
Goldston D
Nature; 2008 Jun; 453(7197):838. PubMed ID: 18548041
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Stem cell research bravely limps ahead.
Nat Neurosci; 2006 Sep; 9(9):1077. PubMed ID: 16936763
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. National Cancer Act: a look back and forward.
Vanchieri C
J Natl Cancer Inst; 2007 Mar; 99(5):342-5. PubMed ID: 17341721
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Scientists turn anxious eyes to Bush's second term.
Knight J
Nat Med; 2004 Dec; 10(12):1265. PubMed ID: 15580231
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Harmonizing regulations for biomedical research: a critical analysis of the US and Venezuelan systems.
Di Tillio-Gonzalez D; Fischbach RL
Dev World Bioeth; 2008 Dec; 8(3):167-77. PubMed ID: 17488491
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Senate approves NIH funding amendment to 2009 proposed budget.
Lang L
Gastroenterology; 2008 Jun; 134(7):1821. PubMed ID: 18474245
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Research funding. Politics and funding in the U.S. public biomedical R&D system.
Hegde D; Mowery DC
Science; 2008 Dec; 322(5909):1797-8. PubMed ID: 19095928
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
