These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

78 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1945069)

  • 1. Errors in reporting habitual energy intake.
    Nutr Rev; 1991 Jul; 49(7):215-7. PubMed ID: 1945069
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Limitations in the assessment of dietary energy intake by self-report.
    Schoeller DA
    Metabolism; 1995 Feb; 44(2 Suppl 2):18-22. PubMed ID: 7869932
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Accuracy of weighed dietary records in studies of diet and health.
    Livingstone MB; Prentice AM; Strain JJ; Coward WA; Black AE; Barker ME; McKenna PG; Whitehead RG
    BMJ; 1990 Mar; 300(6726):708-12. PubMed ID: 2386561
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Evaluation of four methods for determining energy intake in young and older women: comparison with doubly labeled water measurements of total energy expenditure.
    Sawaya AL; Tucker K; Tsay R; Willett W; Saltzman E; Dallal GE; Roberts SB
    Am J Clin Nutr; 1996 Apr; 63(4):491-9. PubMed ID: 8599311
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Validation of estimates of energy intake by weighed dietary record and diet history in children and adolescents.
    Livingstone MB; Prentice AM; Coward WA; Strain JJ; Black AE; Davies PS; Stewart CM; McKenna PG; Whitehead RG
    Am J Clin Nutr; 1992 Jul; 56(1):29-35. PubMed ID: 1609757
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Four-day multimedia diet records underestimate energy needs in middle-aged and elderly women as determined by doubly-labeled water.
    Kaczkowski CH; Jones PJ; Feng J; Bayley HS
    J Nutr; 2000 Apr; 130(4):802-5. PubMed ID: 10736333
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparison of energy intakes determined by food records and doubly labeled water in women participating in a dietary-intervention trial.
    Martin LJ; Su W; Jones PJ; Lockwood GA; Tritchler DL; Boyd NF
    Am J Clin Nutr; 1996 Apr; 63(4):483-90. PubMed ID: 8599310
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. How accurate is self-reported dietary energy intake?
    Schoeller DA
    Nutr Rev; 1990 Oct; 48(10):373-9. PubMed ID: 2082216
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Assessment of energy intake in women with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: a doubly labeled water method study.
    Farooqi N; Slinde F; Håglin L; Sandström T
    J Nutr Health Aging; 2015 May; 19(5):518-24. PubMed ID: 25923480
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Improved reporting of habitual food intake after confrontation with earlier results on food reporting.
    Goris AH; Westerterp KR
    Br J Nutr; 2000 Apr; 83(4):363-9. PubMed ID: 10858694
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The validity of a four day weighed food record for measuring energy intake in female classical ballet dancers.
    Hill RJ; Davies PS
    Eur J Clin Nutr; 1999 Sep; 53(9):752-3. PubMed ID: 10509774
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. In-person vs telephone-administered multiple-pass 24-hour recalls in women: validation with doubly labeled water.
    Tran KM; Johnson RK; Soultanakis RP; Matthews DE
    J Am Diet Assoc; 2000 Jul; 100(7):777-83. PubMed ID: 10916515
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Measurements of total energy expenditure provide insights into the validity of dietary measurements of energy intake.
    Black AE; Prentice AM; Goldberg GR; Jebb SA; Bingham SA; Livingstone MB; Coward WA
    J Am Diet Assoc; 1993 May; 93(5):572-9. PubMed ID: 8315169
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Validation of energy intake measurements determined from observer-recorded food records and recall methods compared with the doubly labeled water method in overweight and obese individuals.
    Hise ME; Sullivan DK; Jacobsen DJ; Johnson SL; Donnelly JE
    Am J Clin Nutr; 2002 Feb; 75(2):263-7. PubMed ID: 11815316
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Underreporting of habitual food intake is explained by undereating in highly motivated lean women.
    Goris AH; Westerterp KR
    J Nutr; 1999 Apr; 129(4):878-82. PubMed ID: 10203564
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Physical activity levels from a meta-analysis of doubly labeled water studies for validating energy intake as measured by dietary assessment.
    Black AE
    Nutr Rev; 1996 Jun; 54(6):170-4. PubMed ID: 8810823
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Biased over- or under-reporting is characteristic of individuals whether over time or by different assessment methods.
    Black AE; Cole TJ
    J Am Diet Assoc; 2001 Jan; 101(1):70-80. PubMed ID: 11209588
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Evaluation of dietary assessment instruments against doubly labeled water, a biomarker of habitual energy intake.
    Trabulsi J; Schoeller DA
    Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab; 2001 Nov; 281(5):E891-9. PubMed ID: 11595643
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Unexplained disturbance in body weight regulation: diagnostic outcome assessed by doubly labeled water and body composition analyses in obese patients reporting low energy intakes.
    Buhl KM; Gallagher D; Hoy K; Matthews DE; Heymsfield SB
    J Am Diet Assoc; 1995 Dec; 95(12):1393-400; quiz 1401-2. PubMed ID: 7594141
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Plausible self-reported dietary intakes in a residential facility are not necessarily reliable.
    Whybrow S; Stubbs RJ; Johnstone AM; O'Reilly LM; Fuller Z; Livingstone MB; Horgan GW
    Eur J Clin Nutr; 2016 Jan; 70(1):130-5. PubMed ID: 26220569
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 4.