These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
209 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19450825)
1. Bladder cancer screening in a high risk asymptomatic population using a point of care urine based protein tumor marker. Lotan Y; Elias K; Svatek RS; Bagrodia A; Nuss G; Moran B; Sagalowsky AI J Urol; 2009 Jul; 182(1):52-7; discussion 58. PubMed ID: 19450825 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparison of NMP22 BladderChek test and urine cytology for the detection of recurrent bladder cancer. Kumar A; Kumar R; Gupta NP Jpn J Clin Oncol; 2006 Mar; 36(3):172-5. PubMed ID: 16520358 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Screening and monitoring for bladder cancer: refining the use of NMP22. Ponsky LE; Sharma S; Pandrangi L; Kedia S; Nelson D; Agarwal A; Zippe CD J Urol; 2001 Jul; 166(1):75-8. PubMed ID: 11435827 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Early results of bladder-cancer screening in a high-risk population of heavy smokers. Steiner H; Bergmeister M; Verdorfer I; Granig T; Mikuz G; Bartsch G; Stoehr B; Brunner A BJU Int; 2008 Aug; 102(3):291-6. PubMed ID: 18336612 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Risk stratification for bladder tumor recurrence, stage and grade by urinary nuclear matrix protein 22 and cytology. Shariat SF; Casella R; Wians FH; Ashfaq R; Balko J; Sulser T; Gasser TC; Sagalowsky AI Eur Urol; 2004 Mar; 45(3):304-13; author reply 313. PubMed ID: 15036675 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Impact of risk factors on the performance of the nuclear matrix protein 22 point-of-care test for bladder cancer detection. Lotan Y; Shariat SF; BJU Int; 2008 Jun; 101(11):1362-7. PubMed ID: 18284410 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. NMP22 BladderChek Test: point-of-care technology with life- and money-saving potential. Tomera KM Expert Rev Mol Diagn; 2004 Nov; 4(6):783-94. PubMed ID: 15525221 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Urinary NMP22 BladderChek test in the diagnosis of superficial bladder cancer. Moonen PM; Kiemeney LA; Witjes JA Eur Urol; 2005 Dec; 48(6):951-6; discussion 956. PubMed ID: 16257108 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparative evaluation of the nuclear matrix protein, fibronectin, urinary bladder cancer antigen and voided urine cytology in the detection of bladder tumors. Eissa S; Swellam M; Sadek M; Mourad MS; El Ahmady O; Khalifa A J Urol; 2002 Aug; 168(2):465-9. PubMed ID: 12131289 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Validation of the diagnostic value of NMP22 BladderChek test as a marker for bladder cancer by photodynamic diagnosis. Tritschler S; Scharf S; Karl A; Tilki D; Knuechel R; Hartmann A; Stief CG; Zaak D Eur Urol; 2007 Feb; 51(2):403-7; discussion 407-8. PubMed ID: 16939699 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Four bladder tumor markers have a disappointingly low sensitivity for small size and low grade recurrence. Boman H; Hedelin H; Holmäng S J Urol; 2002 Jan; 167(1):80-3. PubMed ID: 11743280 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Clinical application of NMP22 in the management of transitional cell carcinoma of the bladder. Sawczuk IS; Bagiella E; Sawczuk AT; Yun EJ Cancer Detect Prev; 2000; 24(4):364-8. PubMed ID: 11059567 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparison of the sensitivity and specificity of urine cytology, urinary nuclear matrix protein-22 and multitarget fluorescence in situ hybridization assay in the detection of bladder cancer. Kehinde EO; Al-Mulla F; Kapila K; Anim JT Scand J Urol Nephrol; 2011 Mar; 45(2):113-21. PubMed ID: 21091091 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. NMP22: a sensitive, cost-effective test in patients at risk for bladder cancer. Zippe C; Pandrangi L; Potts JM; Kursh E; Novick A; Agarwal A Anticancer Res; 1999; 19(4A):2621-3. PubMed ID: 10470205 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Outcomes of a bladder cancer screening program using home hematuria testing and molecular markers. Bangma CH; Loeb S; Busstra M; Zhu X; El Bouazzaoui S; Refos J; Van Der Keur KA; Tjin S; Franken CG; van Leenders GJ; Zwarthoff EC; Roobol MJ Eur Urol; 2013 Jul; 64(1):41-7. PubMed ID: 23478169 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. NMP22 is a sensitive, cost-effective test in patients at risk for bladder cancer. Zippe C; Pandrangi L; Agarwal A J Urol; 1999 Jan; 161(1):62-5. PubMed ID: 10037369 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Nuclear matrix protein-22: a prospective evaluation in a population at risk for bladder cancer. Results from the UroScreen study. Huber S; Schwentner C; Taeger D; Pesch B; Nasterlack M; Leng G; Mayer T; Gawrych K; Bonberg N; Pelster M; Johnen G; Bontrup H; Wellhäusser H; Bierfreund HG; Wiens C; Bayer C; Eberle F; Scheuermann B; Kluckert M; Feil G; Brüning T; Stenzl A; BJU Int; 2012 Sep; 110(5):699-708. PubMed ID: 22313585 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Comparative evaluation of the diagnostic performance of the BTA stat test, NMP22 and urinary bladder cancer antigen for primary and recurrent bladder tumors. Giannopoulos A; Manousakas T; Gounari A; Constantinides C; Choremi-Papadopoulou H; Dimopoulos C J Urol; 2001 Aug; 166(2):470-5. PubMed ID: 11458049 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Feasibility study of screening for bladder cancer with urinary molecular markers (the BLU-P project). Roobol MJ; Bangma CH; el Bouazzaoui S; Franken-Raab CG; Zwarthoff EC Urol Oncol; 2010; 28(6):686-90. PubMed ID: 21062653 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Economic impact of screening for bladder cancer using bladder tumor markers: a decision analysis. Svatek RS; Sagalowsky AI; Lotan Y Urol Oncol; 2006; 24(4):338-43. PubMed ID: 16818188 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]