BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

279 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19450861)

  • 1. Modelling the attenuation in the ATHENA finite elements code for the ultrasonic testing of austenitic stainless steel welds.
    Chassignole B; Duwig V; Ploix MA; Guy P; El Guerjouma R
    Ultrasonics; 2009 Dec; 49(8):653-8. PubMed ID: 19450861
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Coupling an ultrasonic propagation code with a model of the heterogeneity of multipass welds to simulate ultrasonic testing.
    Apfel A; Moysan J; Corneloup G; Fouquet T; Chassignole B
    Ultrasonics; 2005 May; 43(6):447-56. PubMed ID: 15823319
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Measurement of ultrasonic scattering attenuation in austenitic stainless steel welds: realistic input data for NDT numerical modeling.
    Ploix MA; Guy P; Chassignole B; Moysan J; Corneloup G; El Guerjouma R
    Ultrasonics; 2014 Sep; 54(7):1729-36. PubMed ID: 24759567
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Investigation of the ultrasonic attenuation in anisotropic weld materials with finite element modeling and grain-scale material description.
    Lhuillier PE; Chassignole B; Oudaa M; Kerhervé SO; Rupin F; Fouquet T
    Ultrasonics; 2017 Jul; 78():40-50. PubMed ID: 28324775
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Spatially resolved ultrasonic attenuation in resistance spot welds: implications for nondestructive testing.
    Mozurkewich G; Ghaffari B; Potter TJ
    Ultrasonics; 2008 Sep; 48(5):343-50. PubMed ID: 18325561
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Ultrasonic field profile evaluation in acoustically inhomogeneous anisotropic materials using 2D ray tracing model: Numerical and experimental comparison.
    Kolkoori SR; Rahman MU; Chinta PK; Ktreutzbruck M; Rethmeier M; Prager J
    Ultrasonics; 2013 Feb; 53(2):396-411. PubMed ID: 22963829
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Correction of ultrasonic array images to improve reflector sizing and location in inhomogeneous materials using a ray-tracing model.
    Connolly GD; Lowe MJ; Temple JA; Rokhlin SI
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2010 May; 127(5):2802-12. PubMed ID: 21117730
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Quantitative evaluation of ultrasonic C-scan image in acoustically homogeneous and layered anisotropic materials using three dimensional ray tracing method.
    Kolkoori S; Hoehne C; Prager J; Rethmeier M; Kreutzbruck M
    Ultrasonics; 2014 Feb; 54(2):551-62. PubMed ID: 24008174
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Comparison between experimental and 2-D numerical studies of multiple scattering in Inconel600 by means of array probes.
    Shahjahan S; Rupin F; Aubry A; Chassignole B; Fouquet T; Derode A
    Ultrasonics; 2014 Jan; 54(1):358-67. PubMed ID: 23880120
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Ensemble Empirical Mode Decomposition based methodology for ultrasonic testing of coarse grain austenitic stainless steels.
    Sharma GK; Kumar A; Jayakumar T; Purnachandra Rao B; Mariyappa N
    Ultrasonics; 2015 Mar; 57():167-78. PubMed ID: 25488024
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Finite element modeling of the temperature rise due to the propagation of ultrasonic waves in viscoelastic materials and experimental validation.
    Hosten B; Bacon C; Biateau C
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2008 Dec; 124(6):3491-6. PubMed ID: 19206778
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Enhanced experimental approach to measure the absolute ultrasonic wave attenuation.
    Seldis T
    Ultrasonics; 2010 Jan; 50(1):9-12. PubMed ID: 19682718
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Defect characterization using an ultrasonic array to measure the scattering coefficient matrix.
    Zhang J; Drinkwater BW; Wilcox PD
    IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control; 2008 Oct; 55(10):2254-65. PubMed ID: 18986873
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Measurement of the intrinsic attenuation of longitudinal waves in anisotropic material from uncorrected raw data.
    Seldis T
    Ultrasonics; 2013 Sep; 53(7):1259-63. PubMed ID: 23601966
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Ultrasonic polar scans: numerical simulation on generally anisotropic media.
    Declercq NF; Degrieck J; Leroy O
    Ultrasonics; 2006 Dec; 45(1-4):32-9. PubMed ID: 16831454
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Microstructural characterization of autogenous laser welds on 316L stainless steel using EBSD and EDS.
    Kell J; Tyrer JR; Higginson RL; Thomson RC
    J Microsc; 2005 Feb; 217(Pt 2):167-73. PubMed ID: 15683414
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Ultrasonic attenuation in pearlitic steel.
    Du H; Turner JA
    Ultrasonics; 2014 Mar; 54(3):882-7. PubMed ID: 24268679
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The use of an orthogonality relation for reducing the size of finite element models for 3D guided waves scattering problems.
    Moreau L; Castaings M
    Ultrasonics; 2008 Sep; 48(5):357-66. PubMed ID: 18472122
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. High frequency shear ultrasonic properties of water/sorbitol solutions.
    Camara VC; Laux D
    Ultrasonics; 2010 Jan; 50(1):6-8. PubMed ID: 19740506
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Modeling of size dependent failure in cardiovascular stent struts under tension and bending.
    Harewood FJ; McHugh PE
    Ann Biomed Eng; 2007 Sep; 35(9):1539-53. PubMed ID: 17503185
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 14.