140 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19450991)
1. Prospective randomized study of early pulmonary evaluation of patients scheduled for aortic valve surgery performed by ministernotomy or total median sternotomy.
Calderon J; Richebe P; Guibaud JP; Coiffic A; Branchard O; Asselineau J; Janvier G
J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth; 2009 Dec; 23(6):795-801. PubMed ID: 19450991
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Minimally invasive aortic valve replacement (AVR) compared to standard AVR.
Liu J; Sidiropoulos A; Konertz W
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg; 1999 Nov; 16 Suppl 2():S80-3. PubMed ID: 10613563
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. [Ministernotomy improves the postoperative course in aortic valve replacement].
Bonacchi M; Maiani M; Battaglia F; Prifti E; Giunti G; Campisi S; Sani G
Ital Heart J Suppl; 2002 Dec; 3(12):1214-24. PubMed ID: 12611212
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Pulmonary function following aortic valve replacement: a comparison between ministernotomy and median sternotomy.
Aris A; Camara ML; Casan P; Litvan H
J Heart Valve Dis; 1999 Nov; 8(6):605-8. PubMed ID: 10616235
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Ministernotomy versus complete sternotomy for coronary bypass operations: no difference in postoperative pulmonary function.
Bauer M; Pasic M; Ewert R; Hetzer R
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2001 Apr; 121(4):702-7. PubMed ID: 11279411
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Aortic and mitral valve surgery on the beating heart is lowering cardiopulmonary bypass and aortic cross clamp time.
Gersak B; Sutlic Z
Heart Surg Forum; 2002; 5(2):182-6. PubMed ID: 12125670
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Mini-sternotomy aortic valve replacement: is it safe and effective? Comparison with standard techniques.
Mahesh B; Navaratnarajah M; Mensah K; Ilsley C; Amrani M
J Heart Valve Dis; 2011 Nov; 20(6):650-6. PubMed ID: 22655495
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Upper 'J' ministernotomy versus full sternotomy: an easier approach for aortic valve reoperation.
Mikus E; Calvi S; Tripodi A; Lamarra M; Del Giglio M
J Heart Valve Dis; 2013 May; 22(3):295-300. PubMed ID: 24151754
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparison of right ventricular function after ministernotomy and full sternotomy aortic valve replacement: a randomized study.
Dalén M; Oliveira Da Silva C; Sartipy U; Winter R; Franco-Cereceda A; Barimani J; Bäck M; Svenarud P
Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg; 2018 May; 26(5):790-797. PubMed ID: 29325064
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Propensity score analysis of a six-year experience with minimally invasive isolated aortic valve replacement.
Sharony R; Grossi EA; Saunders PC; Schwartz CF; Ribakove GH; Baumann FG; Galloway AC; Colvin SB
J Heart Valve Dis; 2004 Nov; 13(6):887-93. PubMed ID: 15597578
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Minimal access aortic valve surgery.
Olin CL; Péterffy A
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg; 1999 Jan; 15 Suppl 1():S32-8; discussion S39-43. PubMed ID: 10077393
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Should less-invasive aortic valve replacement be avoided in patients with pulmonary dysfunction?
Albacker TB; Blackstone EH; Williams SJ; Gillinov AM; Navia JL; Roselli EE; Keshavamurthy S; Pettersson GB; Mihaljevic T; Johnston DR; Sabik JF; Lytle BW; Svensson LG
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2014 Jan; 147(1):355-361.e5. PubMed ID: 23332188
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. J-shaped versus median sternotomy for aortic valve replacement with minimal extracorporeal circuit.
Yilmaz A; Sjatskig J; van Boven WJ; Waanders FG; Kelder JC; Sonker U; Kloppenburg GT
Scand Cardiovasc J; 2011 Dec; 45(6):379-84. PubMed ID: 21854091
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. [Aortic valve operations through an upper partial sternotomy].
Kiyama H; Imazeki T; Irie Y; Katayama Y; Murai N; Sato Y; Hata I; Gon S
Kyobu Geka; 1999 Jul; 52(7):519-24; discussion 525-7. PubMed ID: 10402777
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Minimally invasive versus standard approach aortic valve replacement: a study in 506 patients.
Bakir I; Casselman FP; Wellens F; Jeanmart H; De Geest R; Degrieck I; Van Praet F; Vermeulen Y; Vanermen H
Ann Thorac Surg; 2006 May; 81(5):1599-604. PubMed ID: 16631641
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Propensity score analysis of outcomes following minimal access versus conventional aortic valve replacement.
Shehada SE; Öztürk Ö; Wottke M; Lange R
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg; 2016 Feb; 49(2):464-9; discussion 469-70. PubMed ID: 25732967
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Ministernotomy versus full sternotomy aortic valve replacement with a sutureless bioprosthesis: a multicenter study.
Dalén M; Biancari F; Rubino AS; Santarpino G; De Praetere H; Kasama K; Juvonen T; Deste W; Pollari F; Meuris B; Fischlein T; Mignosa C; Gatti G; Pappalardo A; Sartipy U; Svenarud P
Ann Thorac Surg; 2015 Feb; 99(2):524-30. PubMed ID: 25483001
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Initial experience with beating-heart single valve replacement surgery at the University Hospital of the West Indies, Kingston, Jamaica.
Ramphal PS; Irvine RW; Wierenga A; Scarlett M; McGaw CD
West Indian Med J; 2004 Mar; 53(2):109-12. PubMed ID: 15199722
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Heart valve surgery in a very high-risk population: a preliminary experience in awake patients.
Bottio T; Bisleri G; Piccoli P; Negri A; Manzato A; Muneretto C
J Heart Valve Dis; 2007 Mar; 16(2):187-94. PubMed ID: 17484469
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Manubrium-limited ministernotomy versus conventional sternotomy for aortic valve replacement (MAVRIC): study protocol for a randomised controlled trial.
Akowuah E; Goodwin AT; Owens WA; Hancock HC; Maier R; Kasim A; Mellor A; Khan K; Murphy G; Mason J
Trials; 2017 Jan; 18(1):46. PubMed ID: 28129780
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
