695 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19451045)
1. Measures of accuracy and performance of diagnostic tests.
Drobatz KJ
J Vet Cardiol; 2009 May; 11 Suppl 1():S33-40. PubMed ID: 19451045
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Using and interpreting diagnostic tests.
McKenna SL; Dohoo IR
Vet Clin North Am Food Anim Pract; 2006 Mar; 22(1):195-205. PubMed ID: 16517302
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. [Criteria for evaluating the performance and utility of a diagnostic test].
Mancini J; Gaudart J; Giorgi R
Med Trop (Mars); 2009 Feb; 69(1):78-82. PubMed ID: 19499742
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. A non-inferiority test for diagnostic accuracy based on the paired partial areas under ROC curves.
Li CR; Liao CT; Liu JP
Stat Med; 2008 May; 27(10):1762-76. PubMed ID: 17968858
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Clinical performance characteristics of a laboratory test. A practical approach in the autoimmune laboratory.
Bossuyt X
Autoimmun Rev; 2009 Jun; 8(7):543-8. PubMed ID: 19200856
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Advantages to transforming the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve into likelihood ratio co-ordinates.
Johnson NP
Stat Med; 2004 Jul; 23(14):2257-66. PubMed ID: 15236429
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. [Diagnostic accuracy].
Simundić AM
Acta Med Croatica; 2006; 60 Suppl 1():93-111. PubMed ID: 16526310
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Diagnostic tests: a statistical review.
Schulzer M
Muscle Nerve; 1994 Jul; 17(7):815-9. PubMed ID: 8008012
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Study design for the evaluation of diagnostic tests.
Daya S
Semin Reprod Endocrinol; 1996 May; 14(2):101-9. PubMed ID: 8796932
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Quality standards are needed for reporting of test accuracy studies for animal diseases.
Gardner IA
Prev Vet Med; 2010 Dec; 97(3-4):136-43. PubMed ID: 20950876
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. [The measurement parameters and its significance of diagnostic tests].
Zhang ZY; Zheng JW; Yang C; Zhang SY
Shanghai Kou Qiang Yi Xue; 2004 Jun; 13(3):161-3. PubMed ID: 15269847
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The relationships among performance measures in the selection of diagnostic tests.
Einstein AJ; Bodian CA; Gil J
Arch Pathol Lab Med; 1997 Feb; 121(2):110-7. PubMed ID: 9126035
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The agreement chart as an alternative to the receiver-operating characteristic curve for diagnostic tests.
Bangdiwala SI; Haedo AS; Natal ML; Villaveces A
J Clin Epidemiol; 2008 Sep; 61(9):866-74. PubMed ID: 18687288
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. [Mandatory notification and onset of disease].
Boissevain I
Tijdschr Diergeneeskd; 2012 Jul; 137(7):468-9, 471. PubMed ID: 22900426
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Quality systems in veterinary diagnostics laboratories.
de Branco FM
Dev Biol (Basel); 2007; 128():53-6. PubMed ID: 18084928
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Empirical likelihood inference for the area under the ROC curve.
Qin G; Zhou XH
Biometrics; 2006 Jun; 62(2):613-22. PubMed ID: 16918927
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. [Evaluation of the diagnostic value of a test. Main information indices].
Landais P; Besson C; Jais JP
J Radiol; 1995; 76(2-3):I-X. PubMed ID: 7714857
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Advantages to transforming the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve into likelihood ratio co-ordinates.
Fosgate GT
Stat Med; 2005 Apr; 24(8):1287-8; author reply 1288. PubMed ID: 15765500
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Accuracy of diagnostic test interpretations.
Atwell R
Aust Vet J; 2012; 90(1-2):4. PubMed ID: 22256976
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Comparison of non-parametric confidence intervals for the area under the ROC curve of a continuous-scale diagnostic test.
Gengsheng Qin ; Hotilovac L
Stat Methods Med Res; 2008 Apr; 17(2):207-21. PubMed ID: 18426855
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
