These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

193 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19451313)

  • 1. Diagnostic accuracy meta-analysis: review of an important tool in radiological research and decision making.
    Jones CM; Athanasiou T
    Br J Radiol; 2009 Jun; 82(978):441-6. PubMed ID: 19451313
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Diagnostic accuracy meta-analysis: a review of the basic principles of interpretation and application.
    Jones CM; Ashrafian H; Skapinakis P; Arora S; Darzi A; Dimopoulos K; Athanasiou T
    Int J Cardiol; 2010 Apr; 140(2):138-44. PubMed ID: 19592119
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Fundamental measures of diagnostic examination performance: usefulness for clinical decision making and research.
    Langlotz CP
    Radiology; 2003 Jul; 228(1):3-9. PubMed ID: 12832567
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Guidelines for diagnostic tests and diagnostic accuracy in surgical research.
    Jones CM; Ashrafian H; Darzi A; Athanasiou T
    J Invest Surg; 2010 Feb; 23(1):57-65. PubMed ID: 20233006
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Estimating diagnostic accuracy from multiple conflicting reports: a new meta-analytic method.
    Littenberg B; Moses LE
    Med Decis Making; 1993; 13(4):313-21. PubMed ID: 8246704
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Meta-analysis as the core of evidence-based behavioral medicine: tools and pitfalls of a statistical approach.
    Nestoriuc Y; Kriston L; Rief W
    Curr Opin Psychiatry; 2010 Mar; 23(2):145-50. PubMed ID: 20084004
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Bivariate analysis of sensitivity and specificity produces informative summary measures in diagnostic reviews.
    Reitsma JB; Glas AS; Rutjes AW; Scholten RJ; Bossuyt PM; Zwinderman AH
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2005 Oct; 58(10):982-90. PubMed ID: 16168343
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Evidence-based practice: how to perform and use systematic reviews for clinical decision-making.
    Kranke P
    Eur J Anaesthesiol; 2010 Sep; 27(9):763-72. PubMed ID: 20523217
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Bayesian bivariate meta-analysis of sensitivity and specificity: summary of quantitative findings in 50 meta-analyses.
    Menke J
    J Eval Clin Pract; 2014 Dec; 20(6):844-52. PubMed ID: 24828853
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Meta-analysis: a practical decision making tool for surgeons.
    Panesar SS; Bhandari M; Darzi A; Athanasiou T
    Int J Surg; 2009 Aug; 7(4):291-6. PubMed ID: 19464394
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [Critical reading of systematic reviews and meta-analyses about diagnostic imaging].
    Plana MN; Zamora J; Abraira V
    Radiologia; 2015 Nov; 57 Suppl 2():23-30. PubMed ID: 26071664
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Systematic reviews and meta-analyses of diagnostic test accuracy.
    Leeflang MM
    Clin Microbiol Infect; 2014 Feb; 20(2):105-13. PubMed ID: 24274632
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The interpretation of diagnostic tests.
    Shapiro DE
    Stat Methods Med Res; 1999 Jun; 8(2):113-34. PubMed ID: 10501649
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Individual patient data meta-analysis of diagnostic studies: opportunities and challenges.
    Ter Riet G; Bachmann LM; Kessels AG; Khan KS
    Evid Based Med; 2013 Oct; 18(5):165-9. PubMed ID: 23704701
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Hierarchical models for ROC curve summary measures: design and analysis of multi-reader, multi-modality studies of medical tests.
    Wang F; Gatsonis CA
    Stat Med; 2008 Jan; 27(2):243-56. PubMed ID: 17340598
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Meta-analyses of studies of the diagnostic accuracy of laboratory tests: a review of the concepts and methods.
    Vamvakas EC
    Arch Pathol Lab Med; 1998 Aug; 122(8):675-86. PubMed ID: 9701328
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [A review of current concepts in evidence-based radiology].
    Roldán-Valadez E; Lee A; Jiménez-Corona A; Vega-González I; Martínez-López M; Vázquez-LaMadrid J
    Gac Med Mex; 2007; 143(6):489-97. PubMed ID: 18269080
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. An empirical comparison of methods for meta-analysis of diagnostic accuracy showed hierarchical models are necessary.
    Harbord RM; Whiting P; Sterne JA; Egger M; Deeks JJ; Shang A; Bachmann LM
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2008 Nov; 61(11):1095-103. PubMed ID: 19208372
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A comparison of univariate and bivariate models in meta-analysis of diagnostic accuracy studies.
    Foxlee N; Stone JC; Doi SA
    Int J Evid Based Healthc; 2015 Mar; 13(1):28-34. PubMed ID: 25734862
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Meta-analysis of diagnostic accuracy studies in mental health.
    Takwoingi Y; Riley RD; Deeks JJ
    Evid Based Ment Health; 2015 Nov; 18(4):103-9. PubMed ID: 26446042
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.