These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
5. Object recognition is mediated by extraretinal information. Simons DJ; Wang RF; Roddenberry D Percept Psychophys; 2002 May; 64(4):521-30. PubMed ID: 12132755 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Visual search for simple volumetric shapes. Brown JM; Weisstein N; May JG Percept Psychophys; 1992 Jan; 51(1):40-8. PubMed ID: 1549423 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Intrinsic frames of reference in spatial memory. Mou W; McNamara TP J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2002 Jan; 28(1):162-70. PubMed ID: 11827078 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Orientation specificity and spatial updating of memories for layouts. Waller D; Montello DR; Richardson AE; Hegarty M J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2002 Nov; 28(6):1051-63. PubMed ID: 12450331 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Blocking of goal-location learning based on shape. Alexander T; Wilson SP; Wilson PN J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2009 May; 35(3):694-708. PubMed ID: 19379044 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Recognizing faces defined by texture gradients. Liu CH; Collin CA; Farivar R; Chaudhuri A Percept Psychophys; 2005 Jan; 67(1):158-67. PubMed ID: 15912879 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Coincident orientation of objects and viewpoint-dependence in scene recognition. Li J; Zhang K Percept Mot Skills; 2012 Feb; 114(1):301-9. PubMed ID: 22582697 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Location matters: why target location impacts performance in orientation tasks. Gunzelmann G; Anderson JR Mem Cognit; 2006 Jan; 34(1):41-59. PubMed ID: 16686105 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Adoption of an internal viewpoint following presentations of plan-view diagrams and maps. Drummond A; Tlauka M Br J Psychol; 2010 May; 101(Pt 2):243-57. PubMed ID: 19460237 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The effect of distinctive parts on recognition of depth-rotated objects by pigeons (Columba livia) and humans. Spetch ML; Friedman A; Reid SL J Exp Psychol Gen; 2001 Jun; 130(2):238-55. PubMed ID: 11409102 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Detection of symmetry and repetition in one and two objects. Structures versus strategies. Koning A; Wagemans J Exp Psychol; 2009; 56(1):5-17. PubMed ID: 19261573 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The role of sequence order in determining view canonicality for novel wire-frame objects. Balas BJ; Sinha P Atten Percept Psychophys; 2009 May; 71(4):712-23. PubMed ID: 19429954 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The perception of 3D shape from planar cut contours. Egan EJ; Todd JT; Phillips F J Vis; 2011 Oct; 11(12):1-13. PubMed ID: 22016555 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Integration of form across saccadic eye movements. Hayhoe M; Lachter J; Feldman J Perception; 1991; 20(3):393-402. PubMed ID: 1762882 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The figure has a shape, but the ground does not: evidence from a priming paradigm. Baylis GC; Cale EM J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2001 Jun; 27(3):633-43. PubMed ID: 11424650 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]