BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

2224 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19451800)

  • 21. A comparison of stages IB1 and IB2 cervical cancers treated with radical hysterectomy. Is size the real difference?
    Rutledge TL; Kamelle SA; Tillmanns TD; Gould NS; Wright JD; Cohn DE; Herzog TJ; Rader JS; Gold MA; Johnson GA; Walker JL; Mannel RS; McMeekin DS
    Gynecol Oncol; 2004 Oct; 95(1):70-6. PubMed ID: 15385112
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Adenosquamous carcinoma of the cervix: prognosis in early stage disease treated by radical hysterectomy.
    Harrison TA; Sevin BU; Koechli O; Nguyen HN; Averette HE; Penalver M; Donato DM; Nadji M
    Gynecol Oncol; 1993 Sep; 50(3):310-5. PubMed ID: 8406193
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. High-risk group in node-positive patients with stage IB, IIA, and IIB cervical carcinoma after radical hysterectomy and postoperative pelvic irradiation.
    Aoki Y; Sasaki M; Watanabe M; Sato T; Tsuneki I; Aida H; Tanaka K
    Gynecol Oncol; 2000 May; 77(2):305-9. PubMed ID: 10785483
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Adenosquamous histology predicts a poor outcome for patients with advanced-stage, but not early-stage, cervical carcinoma.
    Farley JH; Hickey KW; Carlson JW; Rose GS; Kost ER; Harrison TA
    Cancer; 2003 May; 97(9):2196-202. PubMed ID: 12712471
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Changes in the demographics and perioperative care of stage IA(2)/IB(1) cervical cancer over the past 16 years.
    Covens A; Rosen B; Murphy J; Laframboise S; DePetrillo AD; Lickrish G; Colgan T; Chapman W; Shaw P
    Gynecol Oncol; 2001 May; 81(2):133-7. PubMed ID: 11330939
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Prognostic significance of keratinization in squamous cell cancer of uterine cervix: a population based study.
    Kumar S; Shah JP; Bryant CS; Imudia AN; Ali-Fehmi R; Malone JM; Morris RT
    Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2009 Jul; 280(1):25-32. PubMed ID: 19043726
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Patterns of spread in node-positive cervical cancer: the relationship between local control and distant metastases.
    Stock RG; Chen AS; Karasek K
    Cancer J Sci Am; 1996; 2(5):256-62. PubMed ID: 9166542
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. The impact of lymph node number on survival in patients with lymph node-negative pancreatic cancer.
    Hellan M; Sun CL; Artinyan A; Mojica-Manosa P; Bhatia S; Ellenhorn JD; Kim J
    Pancreas; 2008 Jul; 37(1):19-24. PubMed ID: 18580439
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Adenosquamous carcinoma versus adenocarcinoma in early-stage cervical cancer patients undergoing radical hysterectomy: an outcomes analysis.
    dos Reis R; Frumovitz M; Milam MR; Capp E; Sun CC; Coleman RL; Ramirez PT
    Gynecol Oncol; 2007 Dec; 107(3):458-63. PubMed ID: 17854872
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Matched-case comparison for the role of surgery in FIGO stage Ib1-IIa squamous cell carcinoma of cervix and suspicious para-aortic lymph node metastasis.
    Kim HS; Park NH; Wu HG; Cho JY; Chung HH; Kim JW; Song YS; Kim SH; Kang SB
    Ann Surg Oncol; 2009 Jan; 16(1):133-9. PubMed ID: 18979134
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Positive surgical margins in soft tissue following radical cystectomy for bladder cancer and cancer specific survival.
    Dotan ZA; Kavanagh K; Yossepowitch O; Kaag M; Olgac S; Donat M; Herr HW
    J Urol; 2007 Dec; 178(6):2308-12; discussion 2313. PubMed ID: 17936804
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Total laparoscopic radical hysterectomy (type II-III) with pelvic lymphadenectomy in early invasive cervical cancer.
    Gil-Moreno A; Puig O; Pérez-Benavente MA; Díaz B; Vergés R; De la Torre J; Martínez-Palones JM; Xercavins J
    J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2005; 12(2):113-20. PubMed ID: 15904613
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Prognosis and clinicopathological characteristics of Ib-IIb adenocarcinoma of the uterine cervix in patients who have had radical hysterectomy.
    Irie T; Kigawa J; Minagawa Y; Itamochi H; Sato S; Akeshima R; Terakawa N
    Eur J Surg Oncol; 2000 Aug; 26(5):464-7. PubMed ID: 11016467
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Early cervical carcinoma: the natural history of lymph node involvement redefined on the basis of thorough parametrectomy and giant section study.
    Benedetti-Panici P; Maneschi F; D'Andrea G; Cutillo G; Rabitti C; Congiu M; Coronetta F; Capelli A
    Cancer; 2000 May; 88(10):2267-74. PubMed ID: 10820348
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Reassessing the current TNM lymph node staging for renal cell carcinoma.
    Terrone C; Cracco C; Porpiglia F; Bollito E; Scoffone C; Poggio M; Berruti A; Ragni F; Cossu M; Scarpa RM; Rossetti SR
    Eur Urol; 2006 Feb; 49(2):324-31. PubMed ID: 16386352
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Extent of lymph node retrieval and pancreatic cancer survival: information from a large US population database.
    Schwarz RE; Smith DD
    Ann Surg Oncol; 2006 Sep; 13(9):1189-200. PubMed ID: 16955385
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Long-term follow-up of patients with prostate cancer and nodal metastases treated by pelvic lymphadenectomy and radical prostatectomy: the positive impact of adjuvant radiotherapy.
    Da Pozzo LF; Cozzarini C; Briganti A; Suardi N; Salonia A; Bertini R; Gallina A; Bianchi M; Fantini GV; Bolognesi A; Fazio F; Montorsi F; Rigatti P
    Eur Urol; 2009 May; 55(5):1003-11. PubMed ID: 19211184
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Pelvic lymph node count is an important prognostic variable for FIGO stage I and II endometrial carcinoma with high-risk histology.
    Lutman CV; Havrilesky LJ; Cragun JM; Secord AA; Calingaert B; Berchuck A; Clarke-Pearson DL; Soper JT
    Gynecol Oncol; 2006 Jul; 102(1):92-7. PubMed ID: 16406063
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. The number of lymph nodes with metastasis predicts survival in patients with esophageal or esophagogastric junction adenocarcinoma who receive preoperative chemoradiation.
    Gu Y; Swisher SG; Ajani JA; Correa AM; Hofstetter WL; Liao Z; Komaki RR; Rashid A; Hamilton SR; Wu TT
    Cancer; 2006 Mar; 106(5):1017-25. PubMed ID: 16456809
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Impact of number and site of lymph node invasion on survival of adenocarcinoma of esophagogastric junction.
    Ielpo B; Pernaute AS; Elia S; Buonomo OC; Valladares LD; Aguirre EP; Petrella G; Garcia AT
    Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg; 2010 May; 10(5):704-8. PubMed ID: 20154347
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 112.