145 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1945236)
41. Noise-induced hearing loss and hearing protective devices.
Abel SM
Can J Public Health; 1986; 77 Suppl 1():104-7. PubMed ID: 3742410
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
42. Threshold shift in hearing level stems from non-occupational cause.
Erdreich J
Occup Health Saf; 1989 Jan; 58(1):44-7, 60. PubMed ID: 2922182
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
43. At last--the hearing conservation standard.
Burchett C
Occup Health Saf; 1983 Apr; 52(4):45-6, 54. PubMed ID: 6856238
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
44. NHCA conference highlights top hearing conservation trends.
Schulz TY
Occup Health Saf; 2013 Jun; 82(6):18, 20. PubMed ID: 23858684
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
45. Reduce noise-induced hearing loss with precautions at home and work.
Strasser AL
Occup Health Saf; 1989 Nov; 58(12):47. PubMed ID: 2594302
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
46. [The process of encouraging wearing acoustic protectors in workers in a work place with deafening noise].
Owada H
Kango; 1985 Nov; 36(12):125-32. PubMed ID: 3850176
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
47. Noise? What noise?
Smith G
Occup Health Saf; 1996 Mar; 65(3):38. PubMed ID: 8851890
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
48. Protective devices in a hearing conservation program. The rationale and justification of personal hearing protectors.
Gosztonyi RE
J Occup Med; 1975 Nov; 17(11):731-3. PubMed ID: 1195035
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
49. Noise-induced hearing loss and symphony orchestra musicians: risk factors, effects, and management.
Teie PU
Md Med J; 1998 Jan; 47(1):13-8. PubMed ID: 9448410
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
50. Assessment of personal hearing protection in practice.
Smoorenburg GF; Mimpen TM
Scand Audiol Suppl; 1982; 16():13-22. PubMed ID: 6962507
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
51. A plan for hearing conservation.
Karmy S
R Soc Health J; 1982 Aug; 102(4):176. PubMed ID: 7134394
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
52. Balance communication, protection to solve industrial noise problem.
Michael K
Occup Health Saf; 1989 Nov; 58(12):16, 21-4. PubMed ID: 2594299
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
53. Advances in measurement of noise and hearing.
Ivarsson A; Nilsson P
Acta Otolaryngol Suppl; 1980; 366():1-67. PubMed ID: 6255728
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
54. Military ingenuity.
Fatz R; Ohlin D
Occup Health Saf; 2000 Jun; 69(6):101-2. PubMed ID: 10868382
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
55. Audiometric monitoring may reduce hearing loss, compensation awards.
Sawyer C
Occup Health Saf; 1989 Jan; 58(1):50-2. PubMed ID: 2522170
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
56. Noise know-how.
Lowey B
Occup Health Saf; 2000 Jun; 69(6):95-6. PubMed ID: 10868380
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
57. Noise: past, present and future.
Glorig A
Ear Hear; 1980; 1(1):4-18. PubMed ID: 6446473
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
58. [Enforcing the wear of individual protective ear cover for tractor drivers].
Pasig P; Knabe H; Strähnz K
Z Gesamte Hyg; 1983 Feb; 29(2):91-2. PubMed ID: 6858265
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
59. Effective hearing programs require assessment, testing, enforcement.
Caple GE
Occup Health Saf; 1989 Jan; 58(1):48-9, 52. PubMed ID: 2922183
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
60. [Preventive examination for noise-induced hearing loss in accordance with the new regulation 20].
Laszig R
HNO; 1992 Sep; 40(9):327-30. PubMed ID: 1399709
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
